New apatite fission track thermochronology data from the Siberian Permian-Triassic Traps

The thermal history of the Siberian platform has not been studied and only single thermochronological study is available now [Rosen et al., 2009]. According to high-precision U-Pb dating the main phase of magmatic activity of the Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province took place ~252.0-251.3 Ma [Kamo et al., 2003] and its duration didn’t exceed ~1 Myr. But according to Ar/Ar dating (~240 Ma) [Ivanov et al., 2013] the total duration of the Siberian Traps formation may be estimated as long as ~10 Myr. In addition, single apatite fission track (AFT) ages are approximately 222-185 Ma [Rosen et al., 2009].

We present the first results of AFT dating from the Guli pluton and computer modeling of its post-magmatic cooling, as well as some new AFT ages from other magmatic bodies within the Siberian platform. Based on these data we present the first model of the tectonothermal evolution of the Siberian platform in Mesozoic and Cenozoic.

The Guli massif is located within the Maymecha-Kotuy region of the Siberian Permian-Triassic Traps and is the world's largest alkaline-ultrabasic complex. Results of U-Pb dating of baddeleyite from the carbonatites – the latest intrusion phase – 250.2±0.3 Ma [Kamo et al., 2003] correspond to the time of massif’s crystallization.

AFT dating was conducted by an external detector method at the University of Arizona (Tucson). The fission track ages of the Guli are in the range of ~250-231 Ma with the mean standard error (1σ) ±34 Myr. In addition, we obtain five new AFT ages as well as U-Pb age obtained from different intrusive bodies within the Siberian platform: Kontayskaya intrusion, Odikhincha massif and Padunsky sill. All obtained AFT ages are in the range of 195-173 ±13 (1σ) Ma, which corresponds to the Early-Middle Jurassic. At the same time, the U-Pb LA-ICPMS age of apatite from Padunsky sill is 242±7 Ma.

Thermal history modeling using fission track age data and track lengths distribution was performed in HeFTy v.1.8.3. Based on the obtained results we consider the following model of tectonic-thermal evolution of the studied intrusive massifs: (1) the emplacement of intrusions ca. 250 Ma; (2) their burial under a thick sedimentary (volcanic?) cover; (3) regional exhumation and cooling below 110°C about 220-190 Ma.

The research was carried out with the support of RFBR (grants 18-35-20058 and 18-05-00590) and Programs of development of Lomonosov Moscow State University.