EGU2020-7805
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7805
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Why are some alpine catchments debris-flow active and others not? - the influence of geomorphology on debris-flow initiation

Philipp Aigner1, Leonard Sklar2, Markus Hrachowitz3, and Roland Kaitna1
Philipp Aigner et al.
  • 1University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, Vienna, Austria (philipp.aigner@boku.ac.at)
  • 2Concordia University, Dept. of Geography, Planning and Environment, Montreal, Canada
  • 3Delft University of Technology, Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Water Resources Section, Delft, Netherlands

Processes like flash floods or debris flows, which typically occur in small headwater catchments, represent a substantial natural hazard in alpine regions. Due to the entrainment of sediment, the discharge of debris flows can be up to an order of magnitude larger compared to 100-year fluvial flood events in the same channel, which poses a great threat to affected communities. Besides the triggering rainfall, the initiation of debris flows depends on the watershed’s hydrological and geomorphological susceptibility, which makes it hard to predict and understand where and when debris flows occur.

In this study we aim to quantify the influence of geomorphologic characteristics and long-term sediment dynamics on debris flow activity in the Austrian Alps. Based on a database of debris-flow events within the last 60+ years, a geomorphological assessment of active and non-active sub-catchments in different study regions is carried out. In a first step, we derive geomorphological characteristics, such as terrain roughness, Melton number as well as weathering potential of geological units found within the watersheds. Based on the findings of the terrain shape analysis, a set of representative watersheds will be selected for systematic monitoring of surface elevation changes over the project period of three years. This will be achieved by comparing digital surface models based on photogrammetric UAV surveys and monitoring of channel reaches with cameras.

In order to project these findings onto a larger regional scale, the derived terrain parameters will be used to integrate and extend a previously designed hydro-meteorological debris-flow susceptibility model (Prenner et al., 2018) with a sediment-disposition-model. This will form the basis for an advanced debris flow forecasting tool and help to better assess the impact of climate change on the magnitude and frequency of future debris flows.

 

References:
Prenner, D., Kaitna, R., Mostbauer, K., & Hrachowitz, M. ( 2018). The value of using multiple hydrometeorological variables to predict temporal debris flow susceptibility in an Alpine environment. Water Resources Research, 54, 68226843.

 

How to cite: Aigner, P., Sklar, L., Hrachowitz, M., and Kaitna, R.: Why are some alpine catchments debris-flow active and others not? - the influence of geomorphology on debris-flow initiation, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-7805, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7805, 2020

Displays

Display file