EGU2020-9723, updated on 15 May 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9723
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Glacier evolution modelling with deep learning: challenges and opportunities

Jordi Bolibar1,2, Antoine Rabatel1, Isabelle Gouttevin3, Clovis Galiez4, Thomas Condom1, and Eric Sauquet2
Jordi Bolibar et al.
  • 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, G-INP, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement, Grenoble, France
  • 2Irstea, UR RiverLy, Lyon-Villeurbanne, France
  • 3Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, CNRM, Centre d’Études de la Neige, Grenoble, France
  • 4Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
Glacier surface mass balance (SMB) and glacier evolution modelling have traditionally been tackled with physical/empirical methods, and despite some statistical studies very few efforts have been made towards machine learning approaches. With the end of this past decade, we have witnessed an impressive increase in the available amount of data, mostly coming from remote sensing products and reanalyses, as well as an extensive list of open-source tools and libraries for data science. Here we introduce a first effort to use deep learning (i.e. a deep artificial neural network) to simulate glacier-wide surface mass balance at a regional scale, based on direct and remote sensing SMB data, climate reanalysis and multitemporal glacier inventories. Coupled with a parameterized glacier-specific ice dynamics function, this allows us to simulate the evolution of glaciers for a whole region. This has been developed as the ALpine Parameterized Glacier Model (ALPGM), an open-source Python glacier evolution model. To illustrate this data science approach, we present the results of a glacier-wide surface mass balance reconstruction of all the glaciers in the French Alps from 1967-2015. These results were analysed and compared with all the available observations in the region as well as another physical/empirical SMB reconstruction study. We observe some interesting differences between the two SMB reconstructions, which further highlight the interest of using alternative methods in glacier modelling. Due to (relatively) recent advances in data availability and open tools (e.g. Tensorflow, Keras, Pangeo) this research field is ripe for progress, with many interesting challenges and opportunities lying ahead. To conclude, some perspectives on data science glacier modelling are discussed, based on the limitations of our current approach and on upcoming tools and methods, such as convolutional and physics-informed neural networks. 

How to cite: Bolibar, J., Rabatel, A., Gouttevin, I., Galiez, C., Condom, T., and Sauquet, E.: Glacier evolution modelling with deep learning: challenges and opportunities, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-9723, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9723, 2020.

Displays

Display file