EGU2020-9916, updated on 12 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9916
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

A comparison of OH nightglow volume emission rates as measured by SCIAMACHY and SABER

Martin Kaufmann1,3, Yajun Zhu1,2, Qiuyu Chen1,3, Jiyao Xu2,4, Qiucheng Gong1,3, Jilin Liu1,5, Daikang Wei1,3, Manfred Ern1, and Martin Riese1,3
Martin Kaufmann et al.
  • 1Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung, Juelich, Germany (m.kaufmann@fz-juelich.de)
  • 2now at: State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Research, University of Wuppertal, Germany
  • 4School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 5Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing, China

Hydroxyl (OH) short-wave infrared emissions arising from OH(4-2, 5-2, 8-5, 9-6) as measured by channel 6 of the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) are used to derive OH concentrations of OH(v=4, 5, 8, and 9) between 80 km and 96 km. Retrieved concentrations are used to simulate integrated radiances at 1.6 um and 2.0 um as measured by the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument, which are not fully covered by the spectral range of SCIAMACHY. On average, SABER 'unfiltered' data is on the order of 40% (at 1.6 um) and 20% (at 2.0 um) larger than the simulations using SCIAMACHY data. 'Unfiltered' SABER data is a product, which accounts for the shape, width, and transmission of the instrument’s broadband filters, which do not cover the full ro-vibrational bands of the corresponding OH transitions. It is found that the discrepancy between SCIAMACHY and SABER data can be reduced by more than 50%, if the unfiltering process is carried out manually using published SABER interference filter characteristics and latest Einstein coefficients from the HITRAN database. Remaining differences are discussed with regard to model parameter uncertainties and radiometric calibration.

How to cite: Kaufmann, M., Zhu, Y., Chen, Q., Xu, J., Gong, Q., Liu, J., Wei, D., Ern, M., and Riese, M.: A comparison of OH nightglow volume emission rates as measured by SCIAMACHY and SABER, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-9916, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9916, 2020

Displays

Display file