Intercomparison between Surrogate, Explicit and Full Treatments of VSL Bromine Chemistry within the CAM-Chem Chemistry-Climate Model
- 1Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Institute of Physical Chemistry Rocasolano, Madrid, Spain (a.saiz@csic.es)
- 2Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, National Research Council (ICB-CONICET), Mendoza, 5501, Argentina
- 3School of Natural Sciences, National University of Cuyo (FCEN-UNCuyo), Mendoza, 5501, Argentina
- 4Atmospheric and Environmental Studies Group (GEAA), National Technological University (UTN-FRMendoza), Mendoza, 5501, Argentina
- 5Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations & Modelling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
- 6Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- 7NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- 8Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- 9Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- 10Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
- 11Department of Chemical-Physics, School of Chemistry, National University of Córdoba (INFIQC-CONICET), Córdoba, 5000, Argentina
- 12Climate & Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Many Chemistry Climate Models (CCMs) include a simplified treatment of brominated very short-lived (VSLBr) species by assuming long-lived methyl bromide (CH3Br) as a surrogate for VSLBr. However, given that VSLBr (i.e., bromoform CHBr3 and dibromomethane CH2Br2) decompose more rapidly than CH3Br, their impact on upper tropospheric chemistry and lowermost stratospheric ozone cannot be neglected. Thus, a mistreatment of VSLBr in CCMs may yield an unrealistic representation of their associated impacts. Here, we present a comprehensive intercomparison between various VSLBr chemical approaches with increasing degrees of complexity (i.e., surrogate, explicit, and full), and quantify the global impacts of these natural bromocarbons on tropospheric and stratospheric ozone, as well as on other oxidizing agents. Differences between chemical schemes maximize in the lowermost stratosphere and mid-latitude free troposphere, resulting in a latitudinally dependent reduction of ~1−7 DU in total ozone column and a ~5−15 % decrease of the OH/HO2 ratio, for full compared to surrogate. These bromine-driven changes in HOx abundances are expected to slow-down the oxidative processing of greenhouse gases (i.e., to increase the CH4 lifetime) in a region where these long-lived species have a final chance to undergo tropospheric degradation before injection to the stratosphere. Given the negligible additional computational cost and chemical complexity, we encourage all CCMs oriented to projecting the coupled evolution of stratospheric ozone within a changing climate to include a complete tropospheric representation of VSLBr sources and chemistry in the troposphere and stratosphere.
How to cite: Fernandez, R. P., Barrera, J. A., López-Noreña, A. I., Kinnison, D. E., Nicely, J., Salawitch, R. J., Wales, P. A., Toselli, B. M., Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J.-F., Cuevas, C. A., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Intercomparison between Surrogate, Explicit and Full Treatments of VSL Bromine Chemistry within the CAM-Chem Chemistry-Climate Model, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-11411, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11411, 2021.
Corresponding displays formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.