EGU21-12676, updated on 04 Mar 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-12676
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Wavelet Analysis Identifies Carbon Processes in a Subarctic Stream During Snowmelt Spring Flood

Danny Croghan1, Pertti Ala-Aho1, Annalea Lohila2,3, Jeffrey Welker4,5,6, Jussi Vuorenmaa7, Mika Aurela2, Kaisa-Riikka Mustonen4, Bjørn Kløve1, and Hannu Marttila1
Danny Croghan et al.
  • 1Water, Energy and Environmental Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (danny.croghan@oulu.fi)
  • 2Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, Finland
  • 4Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • 5University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
  • 6University of the Arctic, Rovaniemi, Finland
  • 7Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Helsinki, Finland

Snowmelt spring floods dominate the annual carbon flux in Arctic streams. However, climate change is altering their timing and magnitude due to changes in snow conditions, further altering the processes controlling the carbon cycle at the catchment scale. Current knowledge is limited by a lack of high-resolution data from Arctic areas. In this study we combine high-resolution biogeochemical-hydro-climatological variables with spectral wavelet analysis for new insights into carbon processes.

This study was conducted during the snowmelt spring flood period in a sub-arctic headwater catchment in Pallas-Ylläs national park, Finland (68°02′N, 24°16′W). We collected in-stream dissolved organic carbon (DOC), carbon dioxide (C02), and terrestrial C02 flux alongside a suite of hydro-climatological variables measured at 30-minute intervals. Continuous wavelet transformations and wavelet coherence were produced to assess the relationship between hydro-climatological variables and carbon variables at different periodicities.

Wavelet transforms indicated that the onset of snowmelt caused the development of significant diel periodicity for in-stream DOC, CO2 and terrestrial CO2 flux, while substantial periods of significant periodicity were observed at multiple day periodicities. Wavelet coherence analysis identified that DOC was consistently lead by flow and conductivity across daily and multiple daily scales suggesting that transport of carbon from the surface and shallow sub-surface pathways to the stream were the predominant processes controlling in-stream DOC. Interestingly for in-stream CO2, groundwater level showed periodic rather than consistent spectral coherence suggesting it is not a consistent control on CO2 in the spring flood. The strongest coherence for in-stream CO2 was with in-stream O2, which may suggest the importance of in-stream metabolism as a control on in-stream CO2 dynamics. Terrestrial CO2 fluxwas controlled by notably different processes than in-stream Carbon and linked strongest to climatological variables. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) showed the strongest relationship with CO2 terrestrial flux dynamics. 

Our study highlights the unique processes controlling different parts of the carbon cycle in a headwater arctic catchment during the snowmelt spring flood. We highlight in-stream DOC as particularly vulnerable to changes in spring flood magnitude and timing given the importance of snowmelt dominated transport processes to DOC flux. To identify future changes in the Arctic carbon cycle, wavelet analysis shows potential as tool to analyse changes in processes in high-resolution datasets.

How to cite: Croghan, D., Ala-Aho, P., Lohila, A., Welker, J., Vuorenmaa, J., Aurela, M., Mustonen, K.-R., Kløve, B., and Marttila, H.: Wavelet Analysis Identifies Carbon Processes in a Subarctic Stream During Snowmelt Spring Flood, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-12676, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-12676, 2021.

Displays

Display file