EGU21-14177, updated on 10 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-14177
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Improved eddy covariance flux based transpiration estimates at high relative humidity and comparison to sap flux

Weijie Zhang1, Jacob A. Nelson1, Rafael Poyatos2,3, Diego Miralles4, Mirco Migliavacca1, Markus Reichstein1,5, and Martin Jung1
Weijie Zhang et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Biogeochemical Integration, Jena, Germany (wzhang@bgc-jena.mpg.de)
  • 2CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
  • 3Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
  • 4Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab (H-CEL), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • 5Michael-Stifel-Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science, Jena, Germany

Eddy covariance (EC) directly measures evapotranspiration (ET), which consists of transpiration and evaporation (E) from the soil and other surfaces. For process understanding it is pivotal to separate ET into its components. Yet, its computation is highly sensitive to the methodology used to estimate T. Among the multiple methods proposed in recent years, T has been estimated from EC via the Transpiration Estimation Algorithm (TEA, Nelson et al., 2020), and from the sap flux measurement network SAPFLUXNET (Poyatos et al., 2020). These methods are applicable to a large number of measurement sites worldwide, and can help constrain the global estimates of the ratio of T to ET, T/ET. While EC measures water and carbon fluxes across ecosystems globally, water vapor flux measurements can be underestimated at high relative humidity (Ibrom et al., 2007; Mammarella et al., 2009) causing errors in the measured ET and propagating into the predicted T.

Here we report a method to detect and correct the high relative humidity error caused by attenuation of high frequency in water vapor measurements of a closed-path EC system. Our results of the comparison between present water use efficiency (WUE) with previous TEA-based WUE show that the corrected WUE is lower at high relative humidity than that derived from previous TEA at the sub-daily scale. Besides, we compare the corrected T estimates from EC to concurrent SAPFLUXNET sites to show an improved relationship between sap flux and EC based T, T/ET, and WUE. Finally, we explore the main abiotic factors, such as vapor pressure deficit, air temperature, and precipitation, influencing WUE estimated from different T estimation methodologies. These results provide an improved data-driven approach to the ongoing research on ET partitioning and the factors influencing the WUE across ecosystems globally.

 

Ibrom, A. et al. (2007) ‘Strong low-pass filtering effects on water vapour flux measurements with closed-path eddy correlation systems’, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.07.007.

Mammarella, I. et al. (2009) ‘Relative humidity effect on the high-frequency attenuation of water vapor flux measured by a closed-path eddy covariance system’, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1179.1.

Nelson, J. A. et al. (2020) ‘Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites’, Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15314.

Poyatos, R. et al. (2020) ‘Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database’, Earth System Science Data. doi:10.5194/essd-2020-227.

How to cite: Zhang, W., A. Nelson, J., Poyatos, R., Miralles, D., Migliavacca, M., Reichstein, M., and Jung, M.: Improved eddy covariance flux based transpiration estimates at high relative humidity and comparison to sap flux, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-14177, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-14177, 2021.

Corresponding displays formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.