On Downward Continuing Airborne Gravity Data for Local Geoid Modeling

The theories of downward continuation (DC) have been extensively studied for many decades, during which many different approaches were developed. In real applications, however, researchers often just use one method, probably due to resource limitations or to finish their work, without a rigorous head-to-head comparison with other alternatives. Considering that different methods perform quite differently under various conditions, comparing results from different methods can help a lot for identifying potential problems when dramatic differences occur, and for confirming the correctness of the solutions when results converge together, which is extremely important for real applications such as building official national vertical datums. This paper gives exactly such a case study by recording the collective wisdom recently developed within  the IAG’s study group SC2.4.1. A total of six normally used DC methods, which are SHA (NGS), LSC (DTU Space), Poisson and ADC (NRCan), RBF (DU Delft), and RLSC (TUM), are applied to both simulated data (in the combination of two sampling strategies with three noise levels) and real data in a Colorado-area test bed. The data are downward continued to both surface points and to the reference ellipsoid surface. The surface points are directly evaluated with the observed gravity data on the topography. The ellipsoid points are then transformed into geoid heights according to NRCan’s Stokes-Helmert’s scheme and eventually evaluated at the GNSS/Leveling benchmarks. In this presentation, we will summarize the work done and results obtained by the aforementioned workgroup.