EGU21-2718, updated on 03 Mar 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2718
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Calculating and communicating ensemble-based volcanic ash concentration risk for aviation

Natalie Harvey1, Helen Dacre1, and Antonio Capponi2
Natalie Harvey et al.
  • 1University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, Reading, UK (n.j.harvey@reading.ac.uk, h.f.dacre@reading.ac.uk)
  • 2Lancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK (a.capponi2@lancaster.ac.uk)

During volcanic eruptions Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAAC) produce forecasts of ash location and concentration. However, these forecasts are deterministic and do not take into account the inherent uncertainty in the forecasts due to incomplete knowledge of the volcano’s eruption characteristics and imperfect representation of atmospheric processes in numerical models. This means flight operators have incomplete information regarding the risk of flying following an eruption, which could result in overly conservative decisions being made. There is a need for a new generation of volcanic ash hazard charts allowing end users to make fast and robust decisions using risk estimates based on  state-of-the-art probabilistic forecast methods .

 

In this presentation, a method for visualizing ash concentration matrix using a risk-matrix approach will be applied to two volcanic eruptions, Grimsvotn (2011) and Raikoke (2019). These risk-matrix graphics reduce the ensemble information into an easy-to-use decision-making tool. In this work the risk level is determined by combining the concentration of volcanic ash and the likelihood of that concentration occurring.

 

When applying this technique to the Grimsvotn eruption, the airspace containing volcanic ash concentrations deemed to be associated with the highest risk (high likelihood of exceeding a high concentration threshold) to aviation are reduced by over 85% compared to using an ensemble that gives an ash distribution similar to the VAAC issued deterministic forecast. The reduction during the Raikoke eruption can be as much as 40% at a forecast lead time of 48 hours. This has the potential to reduce the disruption to airline operations.  This tool could be extended to include other aviation hazards, such as desert dust, aircraft icing and clear air turbulence.

 

How to cite: Harvey, N., Dacre, H., and Capponi, A.: Calculating and communicating ensemble-based volcanic ash concentration risk for aviation, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-2718, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2718, 2021.

Corresponding displays formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.