Comparative Analysis of the Measured and Modeled Equatorial Thermospheric Wind Climatology
- 1New Jersey Institute of Technology, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research, Newark, NJ, USA (khadka@njit.edu)
- 2University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
- 3Space Weather Prediction Center, NOAA, Boulder, CO, USA
- 4Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
The thermospheric winds play an important role in the vertical and horizontal couplings of the upper atmosphere by modulating neutral and plasma dynamics. A large variety of observation techniques and numerical as well as empirical models have been developed to understand the behavior of thermospheric winds. The Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) is a widely used ground- and satellite-based optical instrument for the thermospheric winds observations in the upper atmosphere. Due to solar contamination of the fainter airglow emission during the daytime, most of the ground-based interferometric wind measurements are limited to the nighttime period only. Despite these constraints, the Second‐generation, Optimized, Fabry‐Perot Doppler Imager (SOFDI) is designed for both daytime and nighttime measurements of thermospheric winds from OI 630‐nm emission and is currently operating at the Huancayo, Peru, near the geomagnetic equator. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the observed SOFDI wind climatological data and several other modeled results including, but not limited to, Horizontal Wind Model 2014 (HWM-14), Coupled Thermosphere Ionosphere Plasmasphere Electrodynamics (CTIPe) model with and without implementing Prompt Penetration Electric Field (PPEF), Whole Atmosphere Model (WAM), SAMI3 model, and Magnetic mEridional NeuTrAl Thermospheric (MENTAT) model. We examine the relative performances of these models in the context of the direct-measured thermospheric winds. The day and nighttime modeled winds show an excellent agreement with the SOFDI wind data at the equatorial latitude, except for the daytime zonal winds. Further, this analysis gives a comprehensive picture of how well the measured winds provided by the SOFDI instrument and various models represent the features of the equatorial thermosphere. We also investigate and give an overview of the sources, drivers, effects, and possible mechanisms of the wind variability in the low-latitude thermosphere.
How to cite: Khadka, S., Gerrard, A., Fedrizzi, M., Dandenault, P., and Meriwether, J.: Comparative Analysis of the Measured and Modeled Equatorial Thermospheric Wind Climatology , EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-6883, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6883, 2021.
