EGU21-7524
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7524
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Quantifying the controls of Peruvian glacier response to climate

Catriona L. Fyffe1, Emily Potter2, Stefan Fugger3,4, Andrew Orr5, Simone Fatichi6, Katy Medina7, Robert Å. Hellström8, Thomas E. Shaw3, Maud Bernat3,9, Alan Llacza10, Gerardo Jacome10, Caroline Aubry-Wake11, Wolfgang Gurgiser12, L. Baker Perry13, Wilson Suarez10, Duncan J. Quincey2, Edwin Loarte7, and Francesca Pellicciotti1,3
Catriona L. Fyffe et al.
  • 1Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK (catriona.fyffe@northumbria.ac.uk)
  • 2School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 3Mountain Hydrology and Mass Movements, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 4Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 5Atmospheric, Ice and Climate, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
  • 6Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 7Dirección de Investigación en Glaciares, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Glaciares y Ecosistemas de Montaña, Huaraz, Perú
  • 8Department of Geography, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA
  • 9Earth Sciences and Environment, Mines Paris Tech, Paris, France
  • 10Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología del Perú, Perú
  • 11Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, Canada
  • 12Department of Atmospheric and Cryospheric Sciences, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 13Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, USA

Peruvian glaciers are important contributors to dry season runoff for agriculture and hydropower, but they are at risk of disappearing due to climate warming. Their energy balance and ablation characteristics have previously been studied only for individual glaciers, with no comparisons between regions. We applied the physically-based, energy balance melt component of the model Tethys-Chloris at five on-glacier meteorological stations: three in the Cordillera Blanca near Huaraz (with glaciers above ~4300 m a.s.l.), and two in the Cordillera Vilcanota east of Cusco (with glaciers above ~ 4800 m). The climate of these regions is strongly seasonal, with an austral summer wet season and winter dry season. 

Our results revealed that at most sites the energy available for melt is greatest in the wet season. This is a consequence of the dry season energy losses from the latent heat flux and net longwave radiation which counter-balance the high dry season net shortwave radiation, which otherwise dominates the energy balance. The sensible heat flux is a relatively small contributor to melt energy in both seasons. Comparison of the five sites suggests that there is more energy available for melt at a given elevation in the Cordillera Vilcanota compared to the Cordillera Blanca. At three of the sites the wet season snowpack was discontinuous, forming and melting within a daily to weekly timescale. Albedo and melt are thus highly variable in the wet season and closely related to the precipitation dynamics. At the highest site, in the accumulation zone of the Quelccaya Ice Cap, 81% of ablation was from sublimation. Sublimation was less important at the lower sites, but it reduces dry season melt. 

Correlation of the NOAA Oceanic El Niño Index (ONI) to the outputs of the two sites with the longest records revealed that the warmer wet season temperatures characteristic of a positive ONI were associated with a decreased albedo, greater net shortwave radiation, a more positive sensible heat flux and increased melt rates.  Air temperature and precipitation inputs were also perturbed at all five sites to understand their sensitivity to climate change. Enhanced mass loss was predicted with a static increase of 2°C or more, even with a +30% precipitation increase, with the lower elevation Cordillera Blanca sites at risk of the greatest mass loss due to warming.

How to cite: Fyffe, C. L., Potter, E., Fugger, S., Orr, A., Fatichi, S., Medina, K., Hellström, R. Å., Shaw, T. E., Bernat, M., Llacza, A., Jacome, G., Aubry-Wake, C., Gurgiser, W., Perry, L. B., Suarez, W., Quincey, D. J., Loarte, E., and Pellicciotti, F.: Quantifying the controls of Peruvian glacier response to climate, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-7524, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7524, 2021.

Display materials

Display file