EGU21-8312, updated on 04 Mar 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8312
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

An application of induced event interferometry approach at The Geysers Geothermal Field, California, USA

Taghi Shirzad1, Stanisław Lasocki2, and Beata Orlecka‐Sikora3
Taghi Shirzad et al.
  • 1Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 30-130, Warsaw, Poland, tshirzad@igf.edu.pl; ORCID: 0000-0002-8382-4990
  • 2Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 30-130, Warsaw, Poland, lasocki@igf.edu.pl; ORCID: 0000-0002-3443-6473
  • 3Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 30-130, Warsaw, Poland, orlecka@igf.edu.pl; ORCID: 0000-0002-0182-1455

While the classical tomography approaches, e.g., P-, S-, and/or surface-wave traveltime tomography, provide a general structure of the Earth’s interior, new developments in signal processing of interferometry approaches are needed to obtain a high-resolution velocity structure. If the number of earthquakes is adequate, the virtual seismometer method may be a solution in regions with sparse instrumental coverage. Theoretically, the empirical Green’s functions between a pair of events can be retrieved using earthquake’s cross-correlations. Here, an event interferometry approach was used on a very small scale around Prati-9 and Prati-29 injection wells in the NW of The Geysers Geothermal Field. The study region experienced intense injection-induced seismicity. We selected all events with location uncertainties less than 50 m in a cuboid of the horizontal side ~1 × ~2 km and the vertical edge at depths between 1.0 and 2.0 km. The cuboid was cut into 100m thick layers, and we applied to events from each layer criteria enabling a quasi 2D approach. After calculating the Rayleigh wave group velocity dispersion curves, further processing was performed at a 0.2s period, selected based on the sensitivity kernel criterion. Finally, the relative velocity model of each layer at the depth z was obtained by subtracting the velocity model of the just overlying layer (at the depth z-100m) from the model of this layer. Our resultant velocity model in the study area indicated four low-velocity anomalies. The first one can be linked by the two layers interface topography variation at the top of the cuboid (depth 1000 m). The secondary faults can cause the second low-velocity anomaly. The other two anomalies look to result from fluid injection into Prati-9 and Prati-29 wells. 
This work was supported under the S4CE: "Science for Clean Energy" project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, under grant agreement No 764810.

How to cite: Shirzad, T., Lasocki, S., and Orlecka‐Sikora, B.: An application of induced event interferometry approach at The Geysers Geothermal Field, California, USA, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-8312, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8312, 2021.

Corresponding displays formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.