EGU21-8587
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8587
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Underplating altered oceanic crust: Insights from numerical modelling

Zoe Braden, Jonas B. Ruh, and Whitney M. Behr
Zoe Braden et al.
  • Structural Geology and Tectonics Group, Geological Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (zoe.braden@erdw.ethz.ch)

Observations of several active shallow subduction megathrusts suggest that they are localized as décollements within sedimentary sequences or at the contact between sedimentary layers and the underlying mafic oceanic crust.  Exhumed accretionary complexes from a range of subduction depths, however, preserve underplated mafic slivers, which indicate that megathrust faults can occasionally develop within the mafic oceanic crustal column. The incorporation of mafic rocks into the subduction interface shear zone has the potential to influence both long-term subduction dynamics and short-term seismic and transient slip behaviour, but the processes and conditions that favour localisation of the megathrust into deeper oceanic crustal levels are poorly understood.

In this work, we use visco-elasto-plastic numerical modelling to explore the long-term (million year) factors influencing the incorporation of mafic volcanic rocks into the subduction interface and accretionary wedge through underplating. We focus on the potential importance of oceanic seafloor alteration in facilitating oceanic crustal weakening, which is implemented through a temperature-dependent pore-fluid pressure ratio (lambda = 0.90-0.99 between 160 and 300oC). We then examine the underplating response to changes in sediment thickness, geothermal gradient, sediment fluid pressure, and surface erosion rates. Our results indicate that a thinner incoming sediment package and a lower geothermal gradient cause oceanic crustal underplating to initiate deeper beneath the backstop (overriding plate) compared to thicker incoming sediment and a higher geothermal gradient. Relative pore fluid pressure differences between sediments and altered oceanic crust control the amount of altered oceanic crust that is underplated, as well as the location of underplating beneath the backstop or accretionary wedge. When sediments on top of the altered oceanic crust have the same fluid pressure as the altered oceanic crust, no oceanic crustal underplating occurs. Modelling results are also compared to exhumed subduction complexes to examine the amount and distribution of underplated mafic rocks.

How to cite: Braden, Z., Ruh, J. B., and Behr, W. M.: Underplating altered oceanic crust: Insights from numerical modelling, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-8587, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8587, 2021.

Displays

Display file