Comparison of AI-based approaches for statistical downscaling of surface wind fields in the North Atlantic

Surface winds — both wind speed and vector wind components — are fields of fundamental climatic importance. The character of surface winds greatly influences (and is influenced by) surface exchanges of momentum, energy, and matter. These wind fields are of interest in their own right, particularly concerning the characterization of wind power density and wind extremes. Surface winds are influenced by small-scale features such as local topography and thermal contrasts. That is why accurate high-resolution prediction of near‐surface wind fields is a topic of central interest in various fields of science and industry. Statistical downscaling is the way for inferring information on physical quantities at a local scale from available low‐resolution data. It is one of the ways to avoid costly high‐resolution simulations. Statistical downscaling connects variability of various scales using statistical prediction models. This approach is fundamentally data-driven and can only be applied in locations where observations have been taken for a sufficiently long time to establish the statistical relationship. Our study considered statistical downscaling of surface winds (both wind speed and vector wind components) in the North Atlantic. Deep learning methods are among the most outstanding examples of state‐of‐the‐art machine learning techniques that allow approximating sophisticated nonlinear functions. In our study, we applied various approaches involving artificial neural networks for statistical downscaling of near‐surface wind vector fields. We used ERA-Interim reanalysis as low-resolution data and RAS-NAAD dynamical downscaling product (14km grid resolution) as a high-resolution target. We compared statistical downscaling results to those obtained with bilinear/bicubic interpolation with respect to downscaling quality. We investigated how network complexity affects downscaling performance. We will demonstrate the preliminary results of the comparison and propose the outlook for further development of our methods.

This work was undertaken with financial support by the Russian Science Foundation grant № 17-77-20112-P.