EGU22-2086, updated on 28 Nov 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2086
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Confronting the water potential information gap

Kimberly Novick1, Darren Ficklin1, Dennis Baldocchi2, Kenneth Davis3, Teamrat Ghezzehei4, Alexandra Konings5, Natasha MacBean1, Nina Raoult6, Russell Scott7, Yuning Shi3, Benjamin Sulman, and Jeffrey Wood
Kimberly Novick et al.
  • 1Indiana Uinversity - Bloomington, United States of America (knovick@indiana.edu)
  • 2University of California - Berkeley (USA)
  • 3Pennsylvania State University (USA)
  • 4University of California - Merced (USA)
  • 5Stanford University (USA)
  • 6Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (France)
  • 7US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ (USA)

Water potential directly controls the function of leaves, roots and microbes, and water potential gradients drive water flows throughout the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Notwithstanding its clear relevance for many ecosystem processes, soil water potential is rarely measured in-situ, and plant water potential observations are generally discrete, sparse, and not yet aggregated into accessible databases. These gaps limit our conceptual understanding of biophysical responses to moisture stress and inject large uncertainty into hydrologic and land surface models. Here, we outline the conceptual and predictive gains that could be made with more continuous and discoverable observations of water potential in soils and plants. We discuss improvements to sensor technologies that facilitate in situ characterization of water potential, as well as strategies for building new networks that aggregate water potential data across sites. We end by highlighting novel opportunities for linking more representative site-level observations of water potential to remotely-sensed proxies. Together, these considerations offer a roadmap for clearer links between ecohydrological processes and the water potential gradients that have the ‘potential’ to substantially reduce conceptual and modeling uncertainties.

How to cite: Novick, K., Ficklin, D., Baldocchi, D., Davis, K., Ghezzehei, T., Konings, A., MacBean, N., Raoult, N., Scott, R., Shi, Y., Sulman, B., and Wood, J.: Confronting the water potential information gap, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2086, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2086, 2022.

Displays

Display file