Revealing unexpected sources and quantities of groundwater discharge into major river systems during drought conditions
- 1Dept. Catchment Hydrology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany (julia.zill@ufz.de, christian.siebert@ufz.de))
- 2Dept. 83 Hydrogeology and pedology, Thuringian State Office for Environment, Mining and Nature Protection (TLUBN), Weimar, 99423, Germany (tino.roediger@ufz.de)
- 3Dept. River Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Magdeburg, 39114, Germany (markus.weitere@ufz.de)
- 4Dept. Monitoring- and Exploration Technologies, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, 04318, Germany (ulf.mallast@ufz.de)
The understanding of groundwater interactions with riverine systems is of utmost importance for ecosystem assessment and management. Diffuse groundwater born nutrients, such as N, P and C contribute significantly to an increase of algae growth in rivers and eventually in estuaries, leading to eutrophication with severe consequences for water quality and ecosystem health. Thus, knowledge of both location dynamics and temporal dynamics of diffuse groundwater discharge areas, as well as the discharging groundwater quantity are required.
Here we provide a multi-methodological approach to gain this information for a large river in Germany, i.e. the Elbe River. We applied complementary methods to a 450 km long stretch including: i) analysis of daily time series of hydraulic gradients between river- and groundwater levels, ii) a flux balance for river segments spanning between neighboring gauging stations, iii) inverse geochemical modeling of the river water composition for each segment, and iv) a Darcy approach as an additional tool based on the hydraulic conductivity of the upper aquifer. The results are manifold, including a spatiotemporal answer to the dynamics and orientation of groundwater interaction with the Elbe.
Groundwater inflow is variable but occurs along the entire river. Areas of high groundwater contribution are located in the upstream mountainous parts, where groundwater makes up to 11% of the total river flow. Further downstream, groundwater inflow decreases, while inversion of hydraulic gradients indicate an immense infiltration of river water into the river banks. Unexpectedly high input of groundwater-like fluids could be detected in the lowland, where geochemical modeling indicated a massive inflow of water in a magnitude of 10% of the total river flow. Given a missing surface and groundwater contribution, an unidentified but apparently large system of subsurface drainage ditches co-exists, which transports water to the Elbe River efficiently during and due to drought-related low flow conditions.
Gaining insight into such a large-scale setting with interfering surface water contributions, effluents of wastewater treatment plants, and diffuse groundwater in- and outflows was possible only by applying the combination of independent geochemical, hydraulic and balancing approaches. With a similar availability of river and well levels and the physical access to the latter, the presented multi-method approach may provide a blueprint for the assessment of other large river systems.
How to cite: Zill, J., Siebert, C., Rödiger, T., Weitere, M., and Mallast, U.: Revealing unexpected sources and quantities of groundwater discharge into major river systems during drought conditions, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2218, 2022.