Can we feed everyone without our modern infrastructure and industry? Simulating potential yield with a generalized linear model in a loss of industry scenario
- 1Justus Liebig University, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Giessen, Germany
- 2Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters (ALLFED), Fairbanks, AK, USA
Modern civilization is highly dependent on industrial agriculture. Industrial agriculture in turn has become an increasingly complex and globally interconnected system whose historically unprecedented productivity relies strongly on external energy inputs in the shape of machinery, mineral fertilizers, and pesticides. It leaves the system vulnerable to disruptions of industrial production and international trade. Several scenarios have the potential to damage electrical infrastructure on a global scale, including electromagnetic pulses caused by solar storms or the detonation of nuclear warheads in the upper atmosphere, as well as a globally coordinated cyber-attack. The current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of crisis preparation and the establishment of more resilient systems. To improve preparation for high-stake risk scenarios their impact especially on critical supply systems must be better understood. To further the understanding of consequences for the global food system this work aims to estimate the effect the global inhibition of industrial production could have on the crop yields of maize, rice, soybean, and wheat. A generalized linear model with a gamma distribution was calibrated on current crop-specific gridded global yield datasets at five arcmin resolution. Gridded datasets on the temperature regime, the moisture regime, soil characteristics, nitrogen, phosphorus and pesticide application rates, the fraction of irrigated area and a proxy to determine whether farm activities are mechanized were chosen as explanatory variables. The model was then used to predict crop yields in two phases following a global catastrophe which inhibits the usage of any electric services. Phase 1 reflects conditions in the year immediately after the catastrophe, assuming the existence of fertilizer, pesticides, and fuel stocks. In phase 2 all stocks are used up and artificial fertilizer, pesticides and fuel are not available anymore. The predictions showed a reduction in yield of 10-30% in phase 1 and between 34 and 43% in phase 2. Overall Europe, North and South America and large parts of India, China and Indonesia are projected to face major yield reductions of up to 95% while most African countries are scarcely affected. The findings clearly indicate hotspot regions which align with the level of industrialization of agriculture. Further, it is shown that the yield reduction is likely to be substantial, especially in industrialized countries. The analysis also provides insights on major factors influencing crop yield under losing industry circumstances. Due to data unavailability some crucial factors could not be included in the model, but their qualitative discussion leads to the conclusion that the presented results can be considered an optimistic scenario, and that further research is needed to quantify the impact of the omitted aspects.
How to cite: Jehn, F. U., Moersdorf, J., Rivers, M., Denkenberger, D., and Breuer, L.: Can we feed everyone without our modern infrastructure and industry? Simulating potential yield with a generalized linear model in a loss of industry scenario, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2619, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2619, 2022.