EGU22-349
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-349
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Numerical Advances in Understanding the Behavior of Gravity Retaining Wall during Seismic Motions

Prerna Singh1, Priyanka Bhartiya1, Tanusree Chakraborty1, and Dipanjan Basu2
Prerna Singh et al.
  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (cez178532@iitd.ac.in)
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (basu.dipan@gmail.com)

The response of gravity retaining walls during ground motion is still a challenging field. Recent developments in computational methods have opened the possibility of enhancing the understanding of the non-linear nature of soil-structure systems, e.g., earth pressure thrust acting on the retaining wall, translational and rotational movements, propagation of waves in the soil more realistically and quickly. Till today, Mononobe Okabe (MO) method (pseudo-static) is the most used analytical method because of its simplicity. However, there are many limitations and gives over-conservative results in terms of earth pressure thrust, and many literatures have already justified such a response. Several improved studies are already available, but very few have considered proper soil-structure interaction, real-time input earthquake data (not sinusoidal), and a sufficient number of earthquakes to evaluate the response acting on the wall during dynamic loading.

We seek contribution by analyzing the problem numerically using FE software Plaxis 2D and studying the behavior of retaining wall during seismic loading (range of amax = 0.053g to 1.2g) in terms of acceleration, displacement, rotation, and earth pressure thrust of retaining wall. The main contribution observed is the acceleration was not uniform throughout the medium instead gets amplified up to around 0.6g and later gets attenuated with maximum amplification occurring at the top of the retaining wall followed by the top of backfill soil and base of the wall. The residual displacement and rotation showed an incremental trend with an increase in horizontal seismic coefficient (kh). The earth pressure thrust obtained using numerical analysis was comparatively less than predicted by the MO method.

Keywords: Gravity retaining wall; Acceleration amplification response; Earth pressure thrust; Finite element method; 

How to cite: Singh, P., Bhartiya, P., Chakraborty, T., and Basu, D.: Numerical Advances in Understanding the Behavior of Gravity Retaining Wall during Seismic Motions, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-349, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-349, 2022.

Displays

Display file