EGU22-4123
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4123
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Characterising the Triassic Palaeomagnetic Field with an Aim to Investigate the Mesozoic Dipole Low.

Ben Handford1, Andy Biggin1, Augusto Rapalini2, Marcela Haldan3, Cor Langereis3, Mariana Monti4, Mónica López de Luchi5, Annique van der Boon1,6, Pablo Franceschinis2, and Banusha Kugabalan1
Ben Handford et al.
  • 1Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (b.handford@liverpool.ac.uk)
  • 2Universidad de Buenos Aires, IGEBA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 3Paleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 4Cátedra de Geología Estructural, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 5Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotópica (INGEIS), Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellon INGEIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 6now at CEED, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Palaeomagnetic field behaviour within the Triassic is relatively poorly documented in comparison with other periods from across the last ca 250 Ma. Developing a more complete understanding of the Triassic field has important implications for discussion surrounding the Mesozoic Dipole Low (MDL) and the processes that govern field intensity and reversal regimes. We have conducted the first palaeosecular variation study that incorporates Triassic virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) data, and analysed this data within the context of the average reversal frequency for the period. We observed remarkably similar VGP dispersion patterns from the late Permian, after the Permo-Carboniferous Reversed Superchron, until the onset of the Cretaceous Normal Superchron, despite fluctuating mean reversal rates. We have also completed palaeointensity experiments on samples with a range of lithologies collected from two localities in Argentina as well as pillow basalts from northern Italy. Previously published radiometric ages place our sampled lithologies across all three Triassic epochs, presenting an opportunity to populate the palaeointensity record at multiple ages across the ~50 Ma lacuna. Results were obtained utilizing a range of methods, the IZZI+ thermal Thellier, Shaw, and pseudo-Thellier. Estimates of virtual dipole moment from these experiments will be presented and discussed in the context of their reliability, and importance in better defining the MDL.

How to cite: Handford, B., Biggin, A., Rapalini, A., Haldan, M., Langereis, C., Monti, M., López de Luchi, M., van der Boon, A., Franceschinis, P., and Kugabalan, B.: Characterising the Triassic Palaeomagnetic Field with an Aim to Investigate the Mesozoic Dipole Low., EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4123, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4123, 2022.

Displays

Display file