EGU22-4154
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4154
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

A Tale of Two Ice Sheets, SSPs, CMIPs and global models: future climate and surface mass balance projections for Greenland and Antarctica

Ruth Mottram1, Fredrik Boberg1, Nicolaj Hansen1,2, Peter Langen3, Shuting Yang1, Mathias Larsen1,3, and Christian Rodehacke1,4
Ruth Mottram et al.
  • 1Danish Meteorological Institute, Research and Development, Copenhagen, Denmark (rum@dmi.dk)
  • 2DTU-Space National Space Institute, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
  • 3Department of Environmental Science Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
  • 4Alfred Wegener Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany

Surface Mass Balance (SMB) is the key driver of ice sheet mass budget. It delivers the snow that nourishes ice sheets and the surface melt that balances snowfall and, along with ocean interactions, drives ice flow. We here present alternative future projections for both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, driven by two different earth system models (ESMs), EC-Earth and CESM2, for two different emissions pathways (SSP585, 245) and in the case of EC-Earth for two different CMIP versions (EC-EARTH2 inCMIP5 and EC-EARTH3 in CMIP6).

We use the regional climate model (RCM) HIRHAM5 to downscale the global models to 5.5km resolution over the Greenland ice sheet and 12km resolution over Antarctica. HIRHAM5 output is then used to drive a surface mass budget model for both ice sheets.

The matrix of models and scenarios gives us the opportunity to examine how different factors, including atmospheric circulation indices, model resolution, ocean dynamics, sea ice and SMB components affect mass budget and sea level rise estimates over the course of the 21st century. About half the difference between CMIP5 and CMIP6 SMB estimates is related to differences in the scenarios compared to the SSPs and about half is related to differences in the driving models. In addition, we compare with other published downscaled SMB estimates from different RCMs (MAR and RACMO) to assess the envelope of likely ice sheet evolution out to 2100. Both CESM2 and EC-EARTH3 have high equilibrium climate sensitivity, and our study correspondingly shows high ice sheet mass loss particularly from Greenland by the end of the century, in line with other published estimates under high emissions scenarios. Melt is increasingly important in both ice sheets, but especially Greenland over the course of the 21st century and scales by temperature and therefore emissions pathway. All model projections show an increase in precipitation, but internal variability in circulation in the Southern Ocean still dominates the patterns in Antarctica and masks to some extent climate change signal in SMB.

Future work will extend the ensemble of SMB estimate with a direct statistically based method, that allows fast downscaling of ESM output directly to SMB using the Copenhagen Ice Sheet Surface Energy and Mass Balance modEL (CISSEMBEL) and we also present some early preliminary results comparing different downscaling techniques.

How to cite: Mottram, R., Boberg, F., Hansen, N., Langen, P., Yang, S., Larsen, M., and Rodehacke, C.: A Tale of Two Ice Sheets, SSPs, CMIPs and global models: future climate and surface mass balance projections for Greenland and Antarctica, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4154, 2022.