EGU22-5163
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5163
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Deep Learning Strategies for Target Classification via Tomographic Ground Penetrating Radar

Michele Ambrosanio, Stefano Franceschini, Maria Maddalena Autorino, and Vito Pascazio
Michele Ambrosanio et al.
  • Univeristy of Naples Parthenope, Department of Engineering, Napoli, Italy (michele.ambrosanio@uniparthenope.it)

Subsurface and underground exploration and monitoring are of interest for several applications which span from geoscience and archaeology to security and safety areas [1, 2]. In the framework of non-destructive testing, ground penetrating radar (GPR) represents a valuable technology that has been extensively exploited for the detection and characterization of buried objects. Nevertheless, this remote sensing modality has some limitations related to the generated output, since these images of the underground require an expert user for their interpretation. Moreover, identifying and characterizing buried objects still represent a non-trivial task [3].

To this aim, several algorithms have been developed to face the aforementioned issues efficiently and automatically. In this context, approaches based on deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been proposed in the past years and recently gained a lot of attention by the scientific community [4]. Despite their efficiency, these approaches require many cases to perform the training step and improve their classification performance.

In this abstract, the case of a multistatic GPR system is considered via two-dimensional numerical simulations to classify the kind of underground utility automatically in areas in which both water and natural gas pipes can be located. More in detail, some discussions on the classification performance by adopting different topologies and network architectures will be dealt with.

 

[1] Persico, R., 2014. Introduction to ground penetrating radar: inverse scattering and data processing. John Wiley & Sons.

[2] Catapano, I., Gennarelli, G., Ludeno, G. and Soldovieri, F., 2019. Applying ground-penetrating radar and microwave tomography data processing in cultural heritage: State of the art and future trends. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(4), pp.53-61.

[3] Ambrosanio, M., Bevacqua, M.T., Isernia, T. and Pascazio, V., 2020. Performance Analysis of Tomographic Methods Against Experimental Contactless Multistatic Ground Penetrating Radar. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, pp.1171-1183.

[4] Kim, N., Kim, S., An, Y.K. and Lee, J.J., 2019. Triplanar imaging of 3-D GPR data for deep-learning-based underground object detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(11), pp.4446-4456.

How to cite: Ambrosanio, M., Franceschini, S., Autorino, M. M., and Pascazio, V.: Deep Learning Strategies for Target Classification via Tomographic Ground Penetrating Radar, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5163, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5163, 2022.