EGU22-7786
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7786
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Evidence-based requirements for perceptualising intercatchment groundwater flow in hydrological models

Louisa Oldham1, Jim Freer1,2, Gemma Coxon1,3, Christopher Jackson4, John Bloomfield5, and Nicholas Howden6
Louisa Oldham et al.
  • 1School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (louisa.oldham@bristol.ac.uk)
  • 2Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, Canada
  • 3Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • 4British Geological Survey, Keyworth, United Kingdom
  • 5British Geological Survey, Wallingford, United Kingdom
  • 6Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Groundwater-dominated catchments are often critical for nationally-important water resources. Many conceptual rainfall-runoff models used for the simulation of river flows tend to degrade in their model performance in groundwater-dominated catchments as they are rarely designed to simulate spatial groundwater behaviours or interactions with surface waters. Intercatchment groundwater flow is one such neglected variable. Efforts have been made to incorporate this process into existing models, but there is a need for greater emphasis on improving our perceptual models of groundwater-surface water interactions prior to any model edits.

In this study, national meteorological, hydrological, hydrogeological, geological and artificial influence (characterising abstractions and return flows) datasets are used to develop a perceptual model of intercatchment groundwater flow and how it varies spatially and temporally across the River Thames. We characterise the water balance, presence of gaining/losing river reaches and intra-annual dynamics in 80 subcatchments of the River Thames in the UK, taking advantage of its wealth of data, densely gauged river network and geological variability.

We show the prevalence of non-conservative river reaches across the study area, with heterogeneity both between, and within, geological units giving rise to a complex distribution of recharge and discharge points along the river network. We identify where non-conservative reaches can be attributed to intercatchment groundwater flow, and where other processes (e.g. human abstractions and discharge uncertainty) are likely the cause. Escarpments of Chalk and Jurassic Limestone show evidence of intercatchment groundwater flow both from headwater to downstream reaches, and out-of-catchment via springlines. We found temporal as well as spatial variability across the study area, with more seasonality and variability in river catchments on Jurassic Limestone outcrops and less on Chalk and Lower Greensand outcrops. Our results show the need for a degree of local investigation and hydrogeological perceptualisation within regional analysis, which we show to be achievable given relatively simple geological interpretation and data requirements.  We then discuss the inclusion of external flow fluxes within existing models to enable calibration improvements in groundwater-dominated catchments, and, importantly, the characterisation of these fluxes given the temporal and spatial variability of intercatchment groundwater flow that our perceptual model has shown.

How to cite: Oldham, L., Freer, J., Coxon, G., Jackson, C., Bloomfield, J., and Howden, N.: Evidence-based requirements for perceptualising intercatchment groundwater flow in hydrological models, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-7786, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7786, 2022.