Measurement report: Disentangling methane and other trace gases sources and transport across the Russian Arctic from aircraft measurements
- 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, Orme des Merisiers, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, 91190Gif-sur-Yvette, France (clement.narbaud@lsce.ipsl.fr)
- 2LAERO, Université de Toulouse, UT3, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France (philippe.nedelec@aero.obs-mip.fr)
- 3V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, Tomsk, Russia (IAO SB RAS), Russia (bbd@iao.ru)
A more accurate characterization of the sources and sinks of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the vulnerable Arctic environment is required to better predict climate change. A large-scale aircraft campaign took place in September 2020 focusing on Siberian coast. CH4 and CO2 were measured in situ during the campaign and form the core of the study. Measured ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO) are used here as tracers. Compared to the reference (i.e., the seasonal value at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, US), median CH4 mixing ratios are fairly higher (1890-1969 ppb vs 1887 ppb) while CO2 mixing ratios from all flights are lower (408.09-411.50 ppm vs 411.52 ppm). We also report on 3 case studies. Our analysis suggests that during the campaign the European part of Russia’s Arctic and Western Siberia were subject to long-range transport of polluted air masses, while the East mainly was under the influence of local emission of greenhouse gases. The relative contributions of anthropogenic and natural sources of CH4 in Siberia are simulated using the Lagrangian model FLEXPART in order to identify dominant sources in the boundary layer and in the free troposphere. In western terrestrial flights, air masses composition is influenced by from wetlands and anthropogenic activities (waste management, the fossil fuel industry and to a lesser extent the agricultural sector), while in the East, emissions are dominated by freshwaters, wetlands, and the oceans, with an ambiguous contribution from likely anthropogenic sources related to fossil fuels. Our results generally highlight the importance of the contribution form freshwater and oceans emissions and, combined with the large uncertainties associated with them, suggest that the emission from these aquatic sources should receive more attention in Siberia.
How to cite: Narbaud, C., Paris, J.-D., Berchet, A., Wittig, S., Saunois, M., Nédelec, P., Belan, B., Arshinov, M., Davydov, D., Fofonov, A., and Kozlov, A.: Measurement report: Disentangling methane and other trace gases sources and transport across the Russian Arctic from aircraft measurements, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-8036, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8036, 2022.