PS7.3
Gas and Ice Giant System Exploration in the Solar System and Beyond

PS7.3

EDI
Gas and Ice Giant System Exploration in the Solar System and Beyond
Convener: Joshua Dreyer | Co-conveners: Fredrik Leffe JohanssonECSECS, Lina Hadid, J. Hunter Waite
Presentations
| Thu, 26 May, 10:20–11:50 (CEST), 13:20–14:50 (CEST)
 
Room D2

Presentations: Thu, 26 May | Room D2

Chairpersons: Joshua Dreyer, J. Hunter Waite
10:20–10:25
Jupiter
10:25–10:30
|
EGU22-1876
|
Highlight
|
Virtual presentation
Olivier Witasse and the JUICE science working team, the JUICE project team and the industrial consortium

JUICE - JUpiter ICy moons Explorer - is the first large mission in the ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. The mission was selected in May 2012 and is currently in final testing phase. Due to launch in 2023 and to arrive at Jupiter in 2031, it will spend at least four years making detailed observations of Jupiter and three of its largest moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa.  The status of the project and the main milestones for 2022 are presented.

The focus of JUICE is to characterise the conditions that might have led to the emergence of habitable environments among the Jovian icy satellites, with special emphasis on the three worlds, Ganymede, Europa, and Callisto, likely hosting internal oceans. Ganymede, the largest moon in the Solar System, is identified as a high-priority target because it provides a unique and natural laboratory for analysis of the nature, evolution and potential habitability of icy worlds and waterworlds in general, but also because of the role it plays within the system of Galilean satellites, and its special magnetic and plasma interactions with the surrounding Jovian environment.

JUICE will also perform a multidisciplinary investigation of the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants. The Jovian atmosphere will be studied from the cloud top to the thermosphere. Concerning Jupiter’s magnetosphere, investigations of the three dimensional properties of the magnetodisc and of the coupling processes within the magnetosphere, ionosphere and thermosphere will be carried out. JUICE will study the moons’ interactions with the magnetosphere, gravitational coupling and long-term tidal evolution of the Galilean satellites.

The JUICE payload consists of 10 state-of-the-art instruments plus one experiment that uses the spacecraft telecommunication system with ground-based instruments. A remote sensing package includes imaging (JANUS) and spectral-imaging capabilities from the ultraviolet to the sub-millimetre wavelengths (MAJIS, UVS, SWI). A geophysical package consists of a laser altimeter (GALA) and a radar sounder (RIME) for exploring the surface and subsurface of the moons, and a radio science experiment (3GM) to probe the atmospheres of Jupiter and its satellites and to perform measurements of the gravity fields. An in situ package comprises a powerful suite to study plasma and neutral gas environments (PEP) with remote sensing capabilities of energetic neutrals, a magnetometer (J-MAG) and a radio and plasma wave instrument (RPWI), including electric fields sensors and a Langmuir probe. An experiment (PRIDE) using ground-based Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) will support precise determination of the spacecraft state vector with the focus at improving the ephemeris of the Jovian system.

The key milestones in 2022 are:

  • Spacecraft flight model environmental acceptance test campaign: Electromagnetic compatibility, mechanical, thermal
  • Spacecraft flight model end-to-end communication tests with the flight control team
  • Readiness review of the ground segment
  • Mission qualification acceptance review

How to cite: Witasse, O. and the JUICE science working team, the JUICE project team and the industrial consortium: JUICE (Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer): status report for 2022, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-1876, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-1876, 2022.

10:30–10:35
|
EGU22-4626
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
|
José Ribeiro, Pedro Machado, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, and João Dias

Jupiter still has some unanswered questions regarding its formation history and atmospheric processes (Taylor et al., Cambridge Planetary Science, 2006). With this work, we hope to contribute to the progress of unravelling some of these questions.

We used the observations of Jupiter from the ESA mission Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) (Kessler et al., A&A 315, L27, 1996) in the 793.65-3125 cm-1 (3.2-12.6 µm) region using the Short-Wave Spectrometer (SWS) (de Graauw et al, A&A 315, L49-L54, 1996). Our work is focused on the 793.65-1492.54 cm-1 (6.7-12.6 µm) region of the spectrum. We argue that it warrants a revisit and reanalysis since it was an important step in the study of Jupiter’s atmosphere and there have been advancements in atmospheric models and line data, despite the age of this dataset.

Firstly, as a way to verify the validity of our method, we used the NEMESIS radiative transfer suite (Irwin et al., Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 109, 1136–1150, 2008) to reproduce the results from Encrenaz et al., Planetary and Space Science 47, 1225-1242, 1999. This study is done using the CIRS NEMESIS template as a base adapted to the ISO-SWS data.  We use correlated k-tables compiled from line data from Fletcher et al., Nature communications 9.1, 1-14, 2018 for a NH3, PH3, 12CH3D, 12CH4, 13CH4, C2H2, C2H6, He, H2, C2H4 and C4H2 model atmosphere, with our results showing good agreement.

Having verified our method, we present here our preliminary results of the study of abundances of 12CH3D, 12CH4, 13CH4, C2H2 and C2H6 of Jupiter’s atmosphere as well as our initial study of the pressure-temperature profile of Jupiter. We use the NEMESIS suite to determine the abundances as a function of altitude and retrieve the pressure-temperature profile. We compare our results with the profiles and abundances from Neimann et al., Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 103(E10):22831-45, 1998 and Fletcher et al., Icarus 278, 128–161, 2016 with the aim to constrain the number of possible best fit profiles.

We also present our initial study the H/D and 12C/13C isotopic ratio of the Jovian atmosphere from the abundances of 12CH3D, 13CH4 and 12CH4 following the methodology from Fouchet et al., Icarus 143, 223–243, 2000.

With this preliminary work we hope to further advance the knowledge about the chemical processes that happen in Jupiter, as well as the chemical and temperature vertical distribution. As future work, we expect to extend our frequency domain to the full range of ISO/SWS observations and study the 15N/14N ratio.

 

 

Acknowledgements

We thank Thérèse Encrenaz, from LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, for providing the data for this work and Patrick Irwin, from the University of Oxford (UK), for the help with the NEMESIS radiative transfer suite.

 

We acknowledge support from the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)/MCTES through the research grants UIDB/04434/2020, UIDP/04434/2020, (ref. PTDC/FIS-AST/29942/2017) through national funds and by FEDER through COMPETE 2020 (ref. POCI-01-0145 FEDER-007672) and through a grant of reference 2021.04584.BD.

How to cite: Ribeiro, J., Machado, P., Pérez-Hoyos, S., and Dias, J.: A reanalysis of ISO-SWS Jupiter observations: preliminary results, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4626, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4626, 2022.

10:35–10:40
|
EGU22-1389
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
Zhimeng Zhang, Virgil Adumitroaie, Michael Allison, John Arballo, Sushil Atreya, Gordon Bjoraker, Scott Bolton, Shannon Brown, Leigh Fletcher, Tristan Guillot, Samuel Gulkis, Andrew Ingersoll, Michael Janssen, Steven Levin, Cheng Li, Jonathan Lunine, Glenn Orton, Fabiano Oyafuso, Paul Steffes, and Michael Wong

Jupiter has ubiquitous clouds and enormous surface structures shrouding the planet. Juno MWR provides the unprecedented chance to answer remaining major questions about the composition and dynamical properties of the great bulk of the atmosphere that lies beneath. Since the launch of Juno, there has been a large effort to collect complementary ground- and space-based observations to help interpret the MWR data. The Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper (JIRAM) onboard Juno complements the observations of MWR, by giving alternative and reference tropospheric measurements that provides the boundary condition for the interpretation of the MWR data [Adriani et al 2014]. Similarly, HST has a 6-month overlap with 13 Juno orbits and color images were constructed from images of Jupiter in red, green, and blue filters by JunoCam [Hansen et al., 2014]. We study the dynamics within the atmosphere by relating the exterior information provided by these surface maps to the deep interior detected by MWR.

During Aug 27, 2016 to October 24, 2017, MWR obtained 8 perijoves (PJ1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9), all scanning Jupiter’s atmosphere from North to South, covering various longitudes. By combing observations from these perijoves, we are able to study the global-averaged atmosphere and the anomalies to be compared with top atmosphere maps. The success of such a study depends on the stability of calibration between different perijoves. In order to combine those data, we investigate and remove the calibration drift with respect to time using our error analysis process. We report two outcomes from the error analysis: 1) The atmosphere stability with respect to longitude and time, as compared to the latitudinal belt and zone structures. 2) The spotted points-of-interest which lie 2 standard deviations away from the global-averaged atmosphere. We compare them with Jupiter’s surface atmosphere images taken by JunoCam, HST and JIRAM, and retrieve the corresponding NH3 volume mixing ratio from surface to over 100 bars.

How to cite: Zhang, Z., Adumitroaie, V., Allison, M., Arballo, J., Atreya, S., Bjoraker, G., Bolton, S., Brown, S., Fletcher, L., Guillot, T., Gulkis, S., Ingersoll, A., Janssen, M., Levin, S., Li, C., Lunine, J., Orton, G., Oyafuso, F., Steffes, P., and Wong, M.: Juno MWR Revealed Points-of-interest from Error Analysis, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-1389, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-1389, 2022.

10:40–10:45
|
EGU22-5339
|
Presentation form not yet defined
Scott Bolton and the Juno Science Team

For over 100 years, Jupiter has been observed and its atmosphere characterized by a well

organized system of zones and belts disrupted by storms and vortices such as the Great

Red Spot (GRS). Jupiter’s weather layer, where storms, vortices, and convective clouds are observed, was expected to be constrained to depths above which sunlight penetrates and/or where water condenses.  In 1995, NASA’s Galileo probe challenged this expectation by finding that water was not well mixed even well below its expected condensation level (1). Early results from Juno extended the puzzle by discovering that both ammonia and water vary across most of the planet at much greater depths than their expected saturation levels (2,3,4), and that the gravitational signatures of the atmospheric zonal flows are present at depths approaching 3000 km (5,6) .The depth that atmospheric vortices penetrate provide a means to investigate how the details of volatile condensation shape Jupiter’s weather, and assess the relative importance of moist convection, baroclinic instability and deep convection in models of vortex creation and stability.

 

The Microwave Radiometer (MWR) instrument (2,7) on the Juno spacecraft is a set of radiometers designed to measure Jupiter’s emitted flux (or equivalently brightness temperature) at a range of depths from top of the atmosphere to over 600 km beneath the visible cloud tops. The instrument observes at six individual frequencies between 0.6 to 22 GHz (wavelengths 50 cm – 1.3 cm), each sampling a different depth determined by how atmospheric transparency varies with frequency. We report on the vertical structure of vortices observed April 2019, comparing the vertical structures of Jupiter’s cyclones and anticyclones, including the Great Red Spot (GRS) which was observed by Juno in July 2017. We show vortex roots can extend deeper than the region where water is expected to condense and are characterized with density inversion layers.

 

Juno’s extended mission offers opportunities to explore the depth of Jovian meteorological phenomena including the vortices encircling the north pole.  A sampling of recent microwave maps of Jupiter’s north polar region will be also be shown. 

 

References

  • Niemann, H.B. et al. The composition of the Jovian atmosphere as determined by the Galileo probe mass spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res.-Planets 103, 22,831–22,845 (1998).
  • Bolton, S. J. et al. Jupiter’s interior and deep atmosphere: The initial pole-to-pole passes with the Juno spacecraft. Science 356, 821–825 (2017).
  • Li, C. et al., The distribution of ammonia on Jupiter from a preliminary inversion of Juno microwave radiometer data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5317–5325 (2017).
  • Ingersoll, A. P. et al. Implications of the ammonia distribution on Jupiter from 1 to 100 bars as measured by the Juno microwave radiometer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7676–7685 (2017).
  • Kaspi, Y. et al. Jupiter’s atmospheric jet streams extend thousands of kilometres deep. Nature 555, 223-226 (2018).
  • Guillot, T. et al. A suppression of differential rotation in Jupiter’s deep interior. Nature 555, 227-230 (2018).
  • Janssen, M. A. et al. MWR: Microwave radiometer for the Juno mission to Jupiter. Space Sci. Rev. 213, 139–185 (2017).

How to cite: Bolton, S. and the Juno Science Team: The Depth of vortices in Jupiter’s atmosphere, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5339, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5339, 2022.

10:45–10:50
|
EGU22-5947
|
Virtual presentation
|
Bertrand Bonfond, Denis Grodent, Benjamin Palmaerts, Randy Gladstone, Sarah Badman, John Clarke, Jean-Claude Gérard, Rohini Giles, Thomas Greathouse, Kamolporn Haewsantati, Vincent Hue, Joshua Kammer, Jonathan Nichols, Guillaume Sicorello, Suwicha Wannawichian, and Zhonghua Yao

Being mostly connected via closed magnetic field lines, the aurorae at the two poles display two broadly similar signatures of the same magnetospheric processes. However, differences are sometimes observed, indicative of asymmetries either in the polar regions (e.g. different solar illumination, magnetic anomalies, etc.) or in the magnetosphere (e.g. twisting of the magnetotail), thus showing two complementary sides of the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling.

Whatever the planet, seeing the aurorae on both poles at the same time is challenging. Either both polar regions can be seen at once, but then only from the side, with poor spatial coverage (especially close and beyond the limb), or we need (at least) two observatories. Here we use the latter option to observe the two faces of the UV aurorae on Jupiter. In the last years, several Hubble Space Telescope observations with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) have been planned during close-up perijove observations of the poles with the UV spectrograph (UVS) on board the Juno spacecraft. The aurorae at Jupiter can be divided into three main components, with the Main Emissions, a quasi-continuous, but sometimes irregular, ribbon of auroral emissions, delimitating the outer emissions outside of it and the polar emissions inside of it. We compare the global morphology and the relative power emitted by the different auroral features in these three regions. Former studies also indicated that synchronized quasi-periodic flares could be observed in both hemispheres and we will look after similar events in this new dataset. Finally, even if the observations are delayed by approximately one hour, we can still compare the mean emitted power before (north) and after (south) each Juno perijove to look for a global trend.

How to cite: Bonfond, B., Grodent, D., Palmaerts, B., Gladstone, R., Badman, S., Clarke, J., Gérard, J.-C., Giles, R., Greathouse, T., Haewsantati, K., Hue, V., Kammer, J., Nichols, J., Sicorello, G., Wannawichian, S., and Yao, Z.: The two faces of the Jovian UV aurorae, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5947, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5947, 2022.

10:50–10:55
|
EGU22-8147
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
|
Rosie Johnson, Tom Stallard, and Henrik Melin

We present a preliminary study of the H3+ auroral emission at Jupiter, which uses data taken with the long-slit Echelle spectrometer, iSHELL, available at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF). Since first light in 2016, iSHELL has been used to provide ground-based support for the NASA-Juno mission, observing Jupiter’s aurora while Juno takes in-situ measurements of the magnetosphere as well as observing the aurora. These ground-based iSHELL measurements are critical as Juno-JIRAM lacks the spectral resolution to measure the Doppler shift of the H3+ spectra, from which the line-of-sight velocity can be derived, and the ionospheric flows inferred.

Previous ground-based H3+ studies have identified several significant ionospheric flows in Jupiter’s auroral region. Sub-rotating flows have been recorded in the dusk-side of the main auroral emission, which is in agreement with our current understanding of the generation of the aurora. However, super-rotating flows were also identified in the dawn-side of the main auroral emission, the origin for which remain uncertain but could lie either in driving from a dynamically changing thermosphere following a solar wind compression or the increase in angular velocity of magnetic field lines past corotation as they rotate into the dawn sector of the magnetosphere and are compressed. Furthermore, previous studies have identified a region of stationary H3+ ions (relative to the magnetic pole) in the polar aurora. This stationary region was originally located coincident to the UV swirl region, however, a more recent study, using a dataset with higher spatial resolution, located the stationary region coincident with the UV dark region, which is also dark in the IR. It is thought that the stationary region is due to coupling to the solar wind either through a Dungey-like process where a single convection cell is confined by the Vasyliunas cycle or through solar wind viscous flow interaction. Therefore, the mechanisms which couple Jupiter’s aurora to the solar wind are yet to be determined.

Here we discuss the longevity and variability of the above flows using the preliminary results from the iSHELL dataset. We consider how, moving forwards, these preliminary results can be compared to Juno data to advance our understanding of the generation of Jupiter’s aurora and how it is coupled to the solar wind. 

How to cite: Johnson, R., Stallard, T., and Melin, H.: Preliminary results from IRTF–iSHELL of Jupiter’s aurora during the NASA-Juno mission, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-8147, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8147, 2022.

10:55–11:00
|
EGU22-1348
|
On-site presentation
|
André Galli, Audrey Vorburger, Shane R. Carberry Mogan, Elias Roussos, Gabriella Stenberg Wieser, Peter Wurz, Martina Föhn, Norbert Krupp, Markus Fränz, Stas Barabash, Yoshifumi Futaana, Pontus C. Brandt, Peter Kollmann, Dennis Haggerty, Geraint H. Jones, Robert E. Johnson, Orenthal J. Tucker, Sven Simon, Tyler Tippens, and Lucas Liuzzo

The JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE) of the European Space Agency will investigate Jupiter and its icy moons Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, with the aim to better understand the origin and evolution of our Solar System and the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants. The Particle Environment Package (PEP) on JUICE is designed to measure neutrals and ions and electrons at thermal, suprathermal, and radiation belt energies (eV to MeV). 

In the vicinity of Callisto, PEP will characterize the plasma environment, the outer parts of Callisto's atmosphere and ionosphere and their interaction with Jupiter's dynamic magnetosphere. About 20 Callisto flybys with closest approaches between 200 km and 5000 km altitude are
planned over the course of the JUICE mission. In this presentation, we review the state of knowledge regarding Callisto's ambient environment and magnetospheric interaction with recent modeling efforts for Callisto's atmosphere and ionosphere to identify science opportunities for the PEP observations and to optimize scientific insight gained from the foreseen JUICE flybys. These considerations inform science operation planning of PEP and JUICE and they will guide future model development for the atmosphere and ionosphere of Callisto and their interactions with the plasma environment.

How to cite: Galli, A., Vorburger, A., Carberry Mogan, S. R., Roussos, E., Stenberg Wieser, G., Wurz, P., Föhn, M., Krupp, N., Fränz, M., Barabash, S., Futaana, Y., Brandt, P. C., Kollmann, P., Haggerty, D., Jones, G. H., Johnson, R. E., Tucker, O. J., Simon, S., Tippens, T., and Liuzzo, L.: Callisto's atmosphere and its space environment: prospects for the Particle Environment Package on board JUICE, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-1348, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-1348, 2022.

11:00–11:05
|
EGU22-5423
|
On-site presentation
Christina Plainaki, Stefano Massetti, Xianzhe Jia, Alessandro Mura, Anna Milillo, Davide Grassi, and Gianrico Filacchione

The dynamics of the energetic ion circulation within Ganymede’s magnetosphere and the related surface precipitation patterns determine the variability of surface sputtering and radiolysis and the generation of the moon’s exosphere. The planetary space weather conditions around this icy moon have a long-term influence also on its surface evolution history.

In this work, some key aspects of the energetic ion circulation within the magnetosphere of Ganymede will be discussed. The results of a single-particle Monte Carlo model driven by the electromagnetic fields from a global MHD model will be presented and compared, where possible, with other findings in literature, from a planetary space weather perspective. The estimated surface precipitation patterns for different ion species/energies and configurations between the Jupiter plasma sheet and Ganymede will be also discussed. Special focus will be given on the implications that the ion precipitation on Ganymede’s surface may have in the water sputtering rate. The results of the current study are relevant to ESA’ s JUICE mission.

How to cite: Plainaki, C., Massetti, S., Jia, X., Mura, A., Milillo, A., Grassi, D., and Filacchione, G.: Energetic ions within Ganymede’s magnetospheric environment, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5423, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5423, 2022.

11:05–11:10
|
EGU22-4791
|
ECS
|
Presentation form not yet defined
Nawapat Kaweeyanun and Adam Masters

The permanent magnetic field of Jupiter’s moon Ganymede is thought to arise from an Earth-like dynamo in the moon’s outer core, alongside a secondary time varying magnetic field induced by convection in the moon’s subsurface ocean. Magnetic fields of Jupiter and Ganymede meet along a current boundary known as the upstream magnetopause, whose location depends on delicate pressure balance and presence of plasma-magnetic interactions including magnetic reconnection. As Ganymede traverses the Jovian plasma sheet, magnetopause conditions vary at half-Jovian synodic period (~5.4 hr), leading to equal-period oscillations of Chapman-Ferraro (C-F) currents and subsequently Ganymede’s magnetospheric field. In this work, we (1) demonstrate that magnetic perturbations from C-F currents will cause induction in Ganymede’s subsurface ocean, and (2) constrain the extent of inducing perturbations based on the (yet unknown) range of Ganymede’s magnetopause motions. Our analysis indicates maximum ocean inductive responses of magnitude order ~1-10 nT. Although improved magnetopause tracking is required to further constrain the response value, the magnitude order lies comfortably within resolution range of the magnetometer aboard the JUpiter ICy moon Explorer (JUICE). Hence, magnetopause interactions may become a viable tool for future induction-based study of Ganymede’s subsurface ocean.

How to cite: Kaweeyanun, N. and Masters, A.: Can Ganymede’s magnetopause interactions help us probe its subsurface ocean?, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4791, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4791, 2022.

11:10–11:15
|
EGU22-7590
|
On-site presentation
|
Audrey Vorburger, Fatemi Shahab, André Galli, Lucas Liuzzo, Andrew Poppe, and Peter Wurz

We present 3D Monte-Carlo simulation results for the surface-sputtered and sublimated H2O molecules in Ganymede's atmosphere. To calculate particle fluxes onto Ganymede's surface, we use test particle model results for electrons, thermal H+ and O+, energetic H+, O++, and S+++, with unprecedented energy resolution. In addition, besides a thermal model based on Galileo measurements, we use recently published surface water content maps and recently measured water sputter yields.

Our simulations show that for the sputtered atmosphere, it is mainly the impinging O+, O++, and S++ ions that deliver H2O to the atmosphere, while electrons and protons only play a minor role in comparison. With Ganymede's surface temperature ranging from 80 K to 150 K (the latter being an upper bound), most returning H2O molecules stick to the surface. As a consequence of this, the morphology of Ganymede's magnetosphere, and the resulting patterns in the precipitation maps, are well preserved in the exosphere up to altitudes of a few thousand kilometers.

In the sub-solar region, it is the sublimated H2O that dominates the atmosphere by up to four orders of magnitude. The sublimated atmosphere quickly decreases with altitude, though, and sputtering becomes the dominant release process for H2O molecules reaching beyond a few hundred kilometers altitude. The sublimated H2O atmosphere is thus quite substantial but highly limited in spatial extent.

In addition to our most important modeling results concerning Ganymede's H2O atmosphere, we will also discuss their implications for spacecraft observability. Using the recently updated JUICE trajectories (CREMA 5), we will show which atmospheric populations (sublimated and/or sputtered H2O) will be encountered during the different Ganymede orbit phases (elliptical, high polar, and low polar). Finally, we will present expected measurement results for the Neutral and Ion Mass spectrometer (NIM), part of the Particle and Environment Package (PEP) onboard JUICE / ESA.

How to cite: Vorburger, A., Shahab, F., Galli, A., Liuzzo, L., Poppe, A., and Wurz, P.: 3D Monte-Carlo Simulations of Ganymede's Water Atmosphere - Predictions for JUICE/PEP/NIM, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-7590, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7590, 2022.

11:15–11:20
|
EGU22-10441
|
Virtual presentation
|
William Kurth, Ali H. Sulaiman, George B. Hospodarsky, J Douglas Menietti, Barry H. Mauk, George Clark, Frederick Allegrini, Phil Valek, John E. P. Connerney, J Hunter Waite, Scott J. Bolton, Masafumi Imai, Ondrej Santolik, Wen Li, Stefan Duling, Joachim Saur, and Corentin Louis

The Juno Waves instrument measured plasma waves associated with Ganymede's magnetosphere during its flyby on 7 June, day 158, 2021.  Three distinct regions were identified including a magnetotail/wake, and nightside and dayside regions in the main magnetosphere distinguished by their electron densities and associated variability. The main magnetosphere includes electron cyclotron harmonic emissions including a band at the upper hybrid frequency, as well as whistler-mode chorus and hiss. These waves likely interact with energetic electrons in Ganymede’s magnetosphere by pitch angle scattering and/or accelerating the electrons.  The magnetotail/wake is accentuated by low-frequency turbulence and electrostatic solitary waves.   Radio emissions observed before and after the flyby likely have their source in Ganymede’s magnetosphere. 

How to cite: Kurth, W., Sulaiman, A. H., Hospodarsky, G. B., Menietti, J. D., Mauk, B. H., Clark, G., Allegrini, F., Valek, P., Connerney, J. E. P., Waite, J. H., Bolton, S. J., Imai, M., Santolik, O., Li, W., Duling, S., Saur, J., and Louis, C.: Juno Plasma Wave Observations at Ganymede, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-10441, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10441, 2022.

11:20–11:25
|
EGU22-10783
|
Virtual presentation
Robert W. Ebert, Frederic Allegrini, NIgel Angold, Fran Bagenal, Scott J. Bolton, Jack Connerney, Gina DiBraccio, Eric Fattig, Stephen A. Fuselier, Steve Levin, David J. McComas, Jake Montgomery, Norberto Romanelli, Jamey R. Szalay, Phil Valek, and Robert J. Wilson

Juno made a close flyby of Ganymede and flew through its magnetosphere on June 7, 2021. This flyby included a crossing of Ganymede’s upstream magnetopause on the outbound segment of the spacecraft transit. We present plasma and magnetic field observations near that magnetopause crossing from Juno’s Jovian Auroral Distributions Experiment (JADE; McComas et al. 2017) and magnetometer (MAG; Connerney et al. 2017), respectively. JADE observed enhanced electron fluxes, including heated, streaming electrons, some with bi-directional pitch angle distributions, as Juno crossed the magnetopause current layer (MCL) as identified by the magnetic field observations. The acceleration of cold ions, both protons and heavy ions originating from Ganymede, was observed on approach to the magnetopause along with a likely mixing of ions from Ganymede and Jupiter’s plasma sheet within the MCL. These observations are used to examine the physics of plasma interactions at this boundary, including evidence that magnetic reconnection, considered a key driver of magnetospheric dynamics at Ganymede, was occurring along the magnetopause at that time.

How to cite: Ebert, R. W., Allegrini, F., Angold, N., Bagenal, F., Bolton, S. J., Connerney, J., DiBraccio, G., Fattig, E., Fuselier, S. A., Levin, S., McComas, D. J., Montgomery, J., Romanelli, N., Szalay, J. R., Valek, P., and Wilson, R. J.: Evidence for Magnetic Reconnection at Ganymede’s Upstream Magnetopause during the PJ34 Juno Flyby, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-10783, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10783, 2022.

11:25–11:30
|
EGU22-7836
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Andrea Magnanini, Marie Fayolle, Luis Gomez Casajus, Marco Zannoni, Paolo Tortora, Valery Lainey, Dominic Dirkx, Leonid Gurvits, Erwan Mazarico, and Ryan Park

ESA’s JUICE and NASA’s Europa Clipper (EC) are the next two missions to the Jupiter system, focusing on three of the Galilean moons: Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto.

JUICE will spend four years in the Jovian system and after tens of flybys of Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto will enter into orbit around Ganymede where it will nominally remain for nine months, until its end of mission. EC will also spend about four years in orbit around Jupiter, performing more than 50 flybys of Europa, the main mission target, but it will also fly by Ganymede and Callisto several times. Combining the data of the two missions will enable a better global estimation of the moons’ gravity fields and ephemerides.

During the Jupiter tours of both missions and JUICE’s Ganymede orbital phase, radiometric tracking data will be acquired at Earth ground stations, enabling precise spacecraft orbit determination, and joint estimation of the main dynamical parameters of the Jupiter system. The two missions rely on different radio links: JUICE is endowed with a triple two-way radio link configuration in two frequency bands (X/X, X/Ka and Ka/Ka) which will allow for a full calibration of dispersive noise sources. EC is capable of X/X and X/Ka links, with X/X being the nominal configuration during Europa flybys.  

Range, range-rate, as well as VLBI (lateral positioning) tracking data, from both missions, will allow to retrieve the static gravity field and tidal parameters of the moons, together with their orbital position. This will also provide crucial information about Jupiter’s gravity tidal parameters, in particular the imaginary part of its Love numbers at the frequency of the Galilean moons. A better characterization of tidal interactions between Jupiter and the Galilean moons can unveil crucial information about the stability and the evolution of the Laplace resonance, governing the dynamics of the three innermost Galilean moons.

In this study, we analyze the attainable uncertainties for the parameters characterizing the ephemerides reconstruction of the Galilean moons using range, range-rate, and VLBI simulated observables. VLBI data mainly provide the spacecraft angular position with respect to reference radio sources (quasars) tied to an inertial frame (“plane of sky”), while range and range and range-rate (being computed along the line of sight) especially constrain the spacecraft state within their orbital plane. Including VLBI data is thus expected to be particularly effective in improving the uncertainty of the moon ephemerides in the out-of-plane direction. We will quantify the synergy between the different radiometric observable types, assess their respective contribution to the moons' ephemerides, the imaginary part of Jupiter’s Love number and analyze the sensitivity of the estimation solution to various parameters (observation planning, expected data quality, etc.)

How to cite: Magnanini, A., Fayolle, M., Gomez Casajus, L., Zannoni, M., Tortora, P., Lainey, V., Dirkx, D., Gurvits, L., Mazarico, E., and Park, R.: Combining JUICE and Europa Clipper range, range-rate and VLBI observables to Improve the Galilean moons ephemerides, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-7836, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7836, 2022.

11:30–11:35
|
EGU22-7933
|
ECS
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Marie Fayolle, Dominic Dirkx, Geoffrey Garrett, Leonid I. Gurvits, Jonas Hener, Valery Lainey, Andrea Magnanini, and Pieter Visser

Context

When generating ephemerides of natural satellites, available tracking data from different space missions, and/or Earth-based photo-/astrometric observations, are not systematically combined in the estimation. Exploiting the complementarity between different data types and data sets is however a key possibility for improving current solutions [1]. In the near future, this will be particularly crucial for Jupiter’s Galilean moons: the synergy between past and upcoming missions (e.g. Galileo, Juno, JUICE, Europa Clipper) and Earth-based observations is critical to better determine their strongly coupled dynamics [2,3].

To facilitate such moons’ ephemerides analyses, we are developing a multi-mission, multi-observation estimation tool. This simulation tool is part of the Tudat(py) open-source software (Python/C++ interfaces, C++ back-end), developed by TU Delft’s Astrodynamics & Space Missions department [4].

Estimation tool capabilities

Our estimation tool can simulate multiple missions and various observation types. Regarding space missions, any number of spacecraft can be included in the estimation, around any natural body. The simulator typically takes SPICE kernels as inputs for the spacecraft’s trajectories [5]. Any change in mission design can therefore be easily investigated by updating the kernel of interest.

The traditional radiometric observables are available (range, Doppler, VLBI), along with direct photo-/astrometry, either Earth- or spacecraft-based. In addition to the spacecraft's and natural bodies' states, various dynamical parameters are estimable, including gravity field coefficients, tidal dissipation parameters, as well as spacecraft- and mission-specific properties (empirical accelerations, observation biases, etc.).

The entire estimation software is freely available to the community [4]. As such, it is directly usable and modifiable, also greatly facilitating verification work. An open-source simulator will be provided for the Galilean moons specifically.

Ongoing and future applications

Regarding Galilean moons’ ephemerides, our software has already been used to compare different state estimation strategies, using JUICE tracking data only, as well as to study a novel approach to include mutual approximations in the estimation [6].

The upgraded multi-mission, multi-observation tool now allows to quantify the contribution of diverse data types and/or data sets. Furthermore, it provides the means to analyse the solution’s sensitivity to spacecraft’s trajectories, dynamical modelling choices, as well as to the observations’ quality and schedule. This is essential to determine which combination of data sets or which observations planning strategy would benefit the solution most.

We will first apply this multi-mission functionality to investigate the unique opportunity for concurrent in-system observations offered by JUICE and Europa Clipper. We will particularly focus on (PRIDE) VLBI data [2], including the possibility for VLBI measurements between the two spacecraft, which would provide valuable information about their relative angular position.

We will also extend our tool’s current capabilities, implementing additional observable types to simulate more diverse Earth-based observations (radar, stellar occultations, mutual events, mutual approximations). This will allow us to assess their contribution to the solution, and thus to define priorities, for both observations planning and data merging.

[1] Lainey et al., 2020

[2] Dirkx et al., 2017

[3] Magnanini et al., in preparation

[4] https://github.com/tudat-team/tudat-bundle

[5] Acton et al., 1996

[6] Fayolle et al., 2021

How to cite: Fayolle, M., Dirkx, D., Garrett, G., Gurvits, L. I., Hener, J., Lainey, V., Magnanini, A., and Visser, P.: An open-source multi-mission, multi-observation estimation tool for natural satellites’ dynamics - Application to Jupiter’s Galilean moons, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-7933, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7933, 2022.

11:35–11:40
|
EGU22-659
|
Virtual presentation
|
Peter Addison, Lucas Liuzzo, and Sven Simon

For the entire ion energy range observed at Europa, we calculate spatially-resolved maps of the surface sputtering rates of H2OO2, and H2 from impacts by magnetospheric ions. We use the perturbed electromagnetic fields from a hybrid model of Europa’s plasma interaction, along with a particle-tracing tool, to calculate the trajectories of magnetospheric ions impinging onto the surface and their resultant sputtering yields. We examine how the distribution of the sputtering rates depends on the electromagnetic field perturbations, the angle between the solar radiation and the corotating plasma flow, and the thickness of the oxygen-bearing layer within Europa's surface. Our major findings are: (a) Magnetic field-line draping partially diverts the impinging ions around Europa, reducing the sputtering rates on the upstream hemisphere, but allowing for substantial sputtering from the downstream hemisphere. In contrast, zero sputtering occurs in much of the downstream hemisphere with uniform electromagnetic fields. (b) If the oxygen-bearing surface layer is thin compared to the penetration depth of magnetospheric ions, thermal ions dominate the O2 sputtering rates, and the region of strongest sputtering is persistently located near the upstream apex. However, if the oxygen-bearing layer is thick compared to the penetration depth, energetic ions sputter the most O2, and the location of maximum sputtering follows the sub-solar point as Europa orbits Jupiter. (c) The global production rate of O2 from Europa’s surface varies by a factor of three depending upon the moon's orbital position, with the maximum particle release occurring when Europa's sun-lit and upstream hemispheres coincide.

How to cite: Addison, P., Liuzzo, L., and Simon, S.: Effect of the Magnetospheric Plasma Interaction and Solar Illumination on Ion Sputtering of Europa's Surface Ice, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-659, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-659, 2022.

11:40–11:45
|
EGU22-5851
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Flavio Petricca, Antonio Genova, Julie Castillo-Rogez, and Erwan Mazarico

The NASA mission Europa Clipper is designed to conduct multi-disciplinary investigations of the interior, composition, and habitability of the Galilean moon Europa. The measurement of Europa’s gravity field, tides, orientation, and moment of inertia (MoI) will enable an accurate characterization of the moon’s interior by constraining internal structure models through the inversion of geophysical measurements. The refined knowledge of Europa’s interior will provide a better understanding of its thermal evolution and of the processes that formed and maintained the liquid water ocean underneath the moon’s outer icy shell. The accurate estimation of the tidal Love number k2 is expected to provide geodetic evidence of the existence of the ocean, and its combination with the Love number h2 will enable the estimation of the icy shell mean global thickness.

The determination of the MoI, obtained either through measurements of the degree-2 gravity field with the hydrostatic equilibrium assumption or by also measuring Europa’s orientation and obliquity, will provide information on the deep interior of the moon, possibly constraining the size and the composition of the solid interior. Numerical simulations are performed to assess the expected accuracy of the key geophysical quantities from the analysis of Europa Clipper radiometric data. These measurements are used in a Bayesian Inversion (e.g., Monte Carlo Markov chain) to explore the properties of Europa’s hydrosphere and deep interior.

How to cite: Petricca, F., Genova, A., Castillo-Rogez, J., and Mazarico, E.: Constraining the Interior Structure of Europa with Gravity Measurements, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5851, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5851, 2022.

11:45–11:50
|
EGU22-6052
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Haje Korth, Robert Pappalardo, Kate Craft, Ingrid Daubar, Hamish Hay, Sam Howell, Rachel Klima, Erin Leonard, Alexandra Matiella Novak, Divya Persaud, and Cynthia Phillips

With a launch readiness date of late 2024, NASA’s Europa Clipper will set out on a journey to explore the habitability of Jupiter’s moon Europa. At the beginning of the next decade, the spacecraft will orbit Jupiter, flying by Europa more than 40 times over a four-year period to observe this moon’s ice shell and ocean, study its composition, investigate its geology, and search for and characterize any current activity. The mission’s science objectives will be accomplished using a highly capable suite of remote-sensing and in-situ instruments. The remote sensing payload consists of the Europa Ultraviolet Spectrograph (Europa-UVS), the Europa Imaging System (EIS), the Mapping Imaging Spectrometer for Europa (MISE), the Europa Thermal Imaging System (E-THEMIS), and the Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-surface (REASON). The in-situ instruments comprise the Europa Clipper Magnetometer (ECM), the Plasma Instrument for Magnetic Sounding (PIMS), the SUrface Dust Analyzer (SUDA), and the MAss Spectrometer for Planetary Exploration (MASPEX). Gravity and radio science will be achieved using the spacecraft's telecommunication system, and valuable scientific data will be acquired by the spacecraft’s radiation monitoring system. Major milestones from the past year include selection of a launch vehicle and launch readiness date by NASA, evaluation of candidate tours by the science team, and preparations for the cruise and operational phases of the mission. The project, flight system, and payload have completed their Critical Design Reviews, and the mission has recently completed its System Integration Review. Spacecraft subsystems and payload are actively being developed, and assembly, test, and launch operations are expected to begin in March 2022. In the meantime, the science team is preparing a set of manuscripts describing the mission science and the instruments that enable these investigations for publication in the journal Space Science Reviews.

How to cite: Korth, H., Pappalardo, R., Craft, K., Daubar, I., Hay, H., Howell, S., Klima, R., Leonard, E., Matiella Novak, A., Persaud, D., and Phillips, C.: Europa Clipper Mission Update, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-6052, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6052, 2022.

Lunch break
Chairpersons: Joshua Dreyer, Lina Hadid
13:20–13:25
|
EGU22-5440
|
Virtual presentation
Fabrizio De Marchi, Paolo Cappuccio, Giuseppe Mitri, and Luciano Iess

Ganymede will be the first icy satellite orbited by a spacecraft: ESA's JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE). The launch is scheduled for September 2022 and the arrival at Ganymede is foreseen in 2035.

Precise range and range-rate data (Ka-band) will be provided by the tracking system of the onboard Geodesy and Geophysics of Jupiter and Galilean Moons experiment (3GM).

These measurements will be used to infer, among others, the static gravity field of the moon up to degree 35-45.

Tidal stresses generate the time-varying part of the Ganymede’s gravitational field and the largest contribution is due to the interaction with Jupiter, modulated by the eccentricity of the Ganymede’s orbit.

However, our work is focused on the lower amplitude time-varying components: those generated by the tidal interactions with Io, Europa and Callisto.

To a good approximation, the corresponding gravitational signals are periodic functions composed by several harmonics of the fundamental synodic frequencies Io-Ganymede, Europa-Ganymede and Ganymede-Callisto. The elastic response of Ganymede is expected to be frequency-dependent as well.

Therefore, we modeled Ganymede’s k2 as a set of coefficients, one for each frequency, to be estimated.

In this work we describe a procedure, supported by numerical simulations and a covariance analysis, to estimate these coefficients in the standard orbit determination framework of the 3GM experiment during the orbital phase at Ganymede.

Finally, we show how the measured coefficients and their accuracies, supported by a viscoelastic model of Ganymede, can be used to provide constraints on the outer ice shell thickness, and on the subsurface ocean density and thickness.

How to cite: De Marchi, F., Cappuccio, P., Mitri, G., and Iess, L.: Frequency-dependent Ganymede’s tidal Love number k2 detection by JUICE’s 3GM experiment and implications regarding the subsurface ocean characterization, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5440, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5440, 2022.

13:25–13:30
|
EGU22-5168
|
ECS
|
Presentation form not yet defined
Namitha Rose Baby, Katrin Stephan, Roland Wagner, Thomas Kenkmann, Nico Schmedemann, and Ernst Hauber

The formation of Ganymede’s light or bright tectonically resurfaced terrain and its possible interaction with a subsurface ocean has been made one of the top goals of the upcoming JUICE mission [1]. We therefore investigate the currently available Voyager and Galileo imaging data covering Ganymede’s light terrain with sufficient spatial resolution. Our focus lies on (1) the definition and characterization of the tectonic subunits/cells of the light terrain including its contact to the neighboring dark terrain and (2) their stratigraphic relationship to each other. Our goal is to study the local formation processes, to identify any changes in tectonic style through time across Ganymede, and also to compare possible differences and similarities of light terrain at different locations. We specifically focus on Mummu and Sippar Sulci which complement our studies of 1) Byblus and Nippur Sulcus (39°N/160°E and 49°N/157°E), 2) Arbela Sulcus (15°S/13°E), 3) Harpagia Sulcus (16°S/50°E) as presented in [2]. We use the geologic mapping procedure defined in previous studies [3, 4] and crater counting techniques for relative geologic age estimation [5,6]. Based on the principle of cross-cutting relationships, the light terrain units (light grooved terrain, light subdued terrain, light irregular terrain and an undivided region) are classified into 3 main categories: (i) Category 1 (lg1, ls1 and li1) contains light terrain units, which are crosscut by all other light terrain units, (ii) Category 2 (lg2, ls2 and li2) contains those light terrain units, which crosscut the Category 1 terrain units and are crosscut by Category 3 units, (iii) Category 3 (lg3, ls3 and li3) contains those light terrain units, which crosscut all adjacent light terrains. The narrow NE-SW striking band that bifurcates in the western part (ls3) crosscuts all other geological units and is consequently mapped as the youngest terrain followed by pateras, which are being crosscut by ls3. This, however, contradicts the theory that the light subdued terrains were formed in the early stage of the light terrain formation [3, 4]. On the contrary, according to our crater counting results, ls3 shows an age similar or slightly older than the adjacent crosscutting terrains like lg2(3) and lg1. The effects of secondary impacts, size and geographic location of the study area onto the crater density results are still under evaluation. REFERENCES: [1] Stephan, K. et al. (2021) PSS. 208, 105324. [2] Baby, N. R. et al. (2021) EPSC abstracts, #EPSC2021-352. [3] Patterson, W. et al. (2010) Icarus, 848. [4] Collins, G. C. et al. (2013) USGS Sci. Inv. Map #3237. [5] Michael, G.G. et al. (2010) Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 294 (3-4), 223-229. [6] Wagner, R. J. et al. (2018) EPSC abstracts, #EPSC2018-855.

How to cite: Baby, N. R., Stephan, K., Wagner, R., Kenkmann, T., Schmedemann, N., and Hauber, E.: Stratigraphy of Ganymede’s light terrain: a case study at Mummu and Sippar Sulci, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5168, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5168, 2022.

13:30–13:35
|
EGU22-4379
|
On-site presentation
|
Athena Coustenis, Conor Nixon, Therese Encrenaz, Panayotis Lavvas, and Olivier Witasse

Icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn are privileged targets in currently developed space missions by several space agencies and in particular ESA, NASA and their partners. One of these missions is ESA’s first large mission in the Cosmic Vision Programme, JUICE [1], which is being developed to address questions regarding the Jupiter system and its satellites, with a focus on the largest moon, Ganymede. The overarching theme for JUICE is the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants taking into account the requirements involving the presence of organic compounds, trace elements, water, energy sources and a relative stability of the environment over time.

Among other, JUICE will determine the characteristics (composition and dynamics) of the exospheres of the icy moons [2], in particular Ganymede and Europa, with for instance coordinated observations among sets of instruments like UVS, PEP, RPWI, MAJIS, 3GM, J-MAG, JANUS and SWI. The JUICE mission is scheduled to be launched in spring 2023 and arrive at Jupiter in mid-2031 and is foreseen to last nominally for 3 and a half years. JUICE investigations will benefit from current observations by JUNO and will be synergistic to NASA’s Europa Clipper mission. I will describe the foreseen investigations of the tenuous atmospheres of the icy moons around Jupiter.

Cassini explored the dense and organic-laden atmosphere of Titan during several flybys over 13 years [2,3] and also determined the characteristics of the Enceladus plumes. However, new questions have risen and several cold cases [4] remain that will constitute major science objectives for future space missions to the satellites around Saturn, like Dragonfly [5] or an orbiter in the Saturn system or a dedicated Enceladus mission…

In particular, Titan’s atmosphere has not yet revealed all its secrets, in particular for the chemical composition, which should be much more complex than what was detected by Cassini-Huygens. Future in situ measurements will be extremely useful in unveiling this unique complex world. In the meantime, ground-based observations with large telescopes like ALMA, elsewhere in Chile or the ones in Hawaii can help complement the past discoveries.

References:

[1] Coustenis, A., Witasse, O., Erd, C., 2021. The JUICE mission: expectations and challenges. Fall issue of The Bridge on space exploration, Sept. 2021, Vol. 51, issue #3, pp. 41-50.

[2] Coustenis, A., Tokano, T., Burger, M. H., Cassidy, T. A., Lopes, R. M., Lorenz, R. D., Retherford, K. D., Schubert G., 2010. Atmospheres/exospheres characteristics of icy satellites. Space Sci. Rev., 153, 155-184. https://www.nae.edu/260902/The-JUICE-Mission-Challenges-and-Expectations

[3] Coustenis, A., 2021. “The Atmosphere of Titan”. In Read, P. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science. Oxford University Press (August 31). doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.120

[4] Nixon, C. A., Lorenz, R. D., Achterberg, R. K., et al. (2018). Titan's cold case files - Outstanding questions after Cassini-Huygens. Planetary and Space Science, 155, 50-72.

[5] Barnes, J. et al. (2021). Science Goals and Objectives for the Dragonfly Titan Rotorcraft Relocatable Lander. The Plan. Sci. J., VoL. 2, Issue 4, id.130, 18 pp.

 

How to cite: Coustenis, A., Nixon, C., Encrenaz, T., Lavvas, P., and Witasse, O.: Future atmospheric research objectives of missions to the Jovian and the Kronian systems, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4379, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4379, 2022.

Saturn
13:35–13:45
|
EGU22-8878
|
ECS
|
solicited
|
Virtual presentation
|
Audrey Chatain, Jan-Erik Wahlund, Oleg Shebanits, Lina Z. Hadid, Michiko Morooka, Niklas J. T. Edberg, Nathalie Carrasco, and Olivier Guaitella

The Cassini Langmuir Probe (LP) data acquired in the ionosphere of Titan are re-analysed to finely study the electron behaviour in the birthplace of Titan’s aerosols (900-1200 km) [Waite et al 2007].

The detailed analysis of the complete Cassini LP dataset below 1200 km (57 flybys) shows the systematic detection of 2 to 4 electron populations (further named P1, P2, P3, P4), with reproducible characteristics depending on altitude and solar illumination. Populations P1 and P2 are always present, contrarily to P3 and P4. Due to their low density and low potential, P1 electrons are suspected to be photo-electrons [Wahlund et al 2009] or secondary electrons emitted on the probe stick.

The electron populations densities and temperatures are deduced from the Orbital Motion Limited theory and the Sheath Limited theory [Wahlund et al 2009, Whipple 1965]. We observe that electron temperatures do not vary much with altitude between 1200 and 950 km, except for P4. Statistical correlations with other quantities measured by Cassini are investigated. In particular, we observe that P3 and P4 densities are correlated with the extreme UV flux.

From our results we suggest possible origins for the three populations P2, P3 and P4, coming from the plasma surrounding the probe:

-P2 is detected in all cases, at rather low density (~500 cm-3) and temperature (~0.04 eV). These are possibly induced by particle precipitation.

-P3 electrons are denser with stronger solar illumination and higher pressure (up to 3000 cm-3). Therefore, they are likely to be related to photo-ionization. They are hotter than P2 electrons (~0.06-0.07 eV).

-P4 electrons are only observed on dayside and below 1200 km, in the place where heavy negative ions and aerosols are present. They are then plausibly linked to dusty plasma effects. We suggest two possible formation processes: (1) the photo-emission of electrons from grains could be triggered by photons of a few eV due to the negative charge born by the aerosols [Shebanits et al 2016; Tigrine et al 2018] ; (2) electrons could also be thermo-emitted from the grains, as a result of their heating by diverse processes such as heterogeneous chemistry, sticking of electrons or recombination of radicals [Woodard et al 2020].

How to cite: Chatain, A., Wahlund, J.-E., Shebanits, O., Hadid, L. Z., Morooka, M., Edberg, N. J. T., Carrasco, N., and Guaitella, O.: Re-analysis of the Cassini RPWS/LP data in Titan’s ionosphere: electron density and temperature of cold electron populations, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-8878, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8878, 2022.

13:45–13:50
|
EGU22-8592
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Oleg Shebanits, Jan-Erik Wahlund, Hunter Waite, and Michele Dougherty

Titan’s ionosphere, host to a global dusty (ion-ion) plasma, provides a unique environment for studies of dusty ionospheres, featuring one of the largest dusty plasma datasets from 126 flybys of the moon over 13 years. Recent studies have shown the charged dust to have a large impact on the electric properties of plasmas, in particular planetary ionospheres. Here we use in-situ data to derive the electric conductivities and define the conductive dynamo region at Titan.

Our results show that using the full plasma content increases the Pedersen conductivities at ~1100-1200 km altitude by up to 35% compared to only using electrons. The Hall conductivities are not consistently affected but several cases indicate a reverse Hall effect at 900 km altitude (closest approach) and below. We also discuss day-night differences, solar activity impact and compare to similar environments.

How to cite: Shebanits, O., Wahlund, J.-E., Waite, H., and Dougherty, M.: Conductivities of Titan's dusty ionosphere, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-8592, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8592, 2022.

13:50–13:55
|
EGU22-13530
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Georgios Xystouris, Christopher Stephen Arridge, Michiko Morooka, and Jan-Erik Wahlund

The Langmuir Probe (LP) onboard Cassini was one of the three experiments that could measure the cold inner magnetospheric plasma, along with the Radio and Plasma Waves Science (RPWS) and the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer (CAPS). While the century-old LP theory looks quite straight-forward, in reality things are much more complicated.

The operation of the LP is quite simple: by applying positive bias voltages, the probe attracts the electrons and repels the ions of the surrounding plasma. From the resulting current-voltage curve characteristics of the ambient electrons can be estimated, i.e. density and temperature. When negative bias voltages are applied to the probe the characteristics of the ambient ions can be estimated, i.e. density, temperature, and mass.

Though the LP operation and interpretation are quite simple and straightforward, there are assumptions made and therefore the theoretical models may not always reflect the actual plasma conditions in Saturn’s magnetosphere. For this study we are focused on the effect of the photoelectrons, i.e. electrons generated by the incident sunlight on Cassini’s surfaces, that are difficult to calibrate for on the ground and then observe and characterise in the LP data.

We present algorithms for identifying when Cassini is in the shadow of Saturn and its rings, and when the LP is in the shadow of Saturn, its rings or Cassini itself. The LP data inside and outside the eclipses are compared using the algorithms developed. In this presentation we will first discuss the impact of the photoelectron generation from the spacecraft surfaces to the LP current-voltage curves, and understand the variations of the measured plasma density connected with the photoelectrons. Then, using that knowledge, we attempt to define the optical depth of the rings in the wavelengths the LP operates in.

How to cite: Xystouris, G., Arridge, C. S., Morooka, M., and Wahlund, J.-E.: Langmuir Probe observations during eclipses of Cassini with Saturn and the Main Rings: ring optical depths and photoelectrons, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-13530, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-13530, 2022.

13:55–14:00
|
EGU22-2678
|
Virtual presentation
Zsofia Bebesi, Antal Juhasz, and Aniko Timar

We present five events of SLAMS (short large-amplitude magnetic structures) detected upstream of the quasi-parallel bow shock of Saturn. The events were discovered and further analyzed using the measurements of the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer and the Magnetometer instruments of the Cassini spacecraft. Directional, speed and temperature analysis of the charged particles in the vicinity of the SLAM structures is presented. We also analyze the effect of upstream parameters (especially the IMF and cone angle) on the ULF wave frequency and subsequent SLAMS formation. We use a simple empirical model to estimate location of the bow shock related to the SLAMS observations. We also discuss the spatial characteristics of SLAMS observed near Saturn by extrapolating the measurements and morphology derived by the four Cluster probes at Earth.

How to cite: Bebesi, Z., Juhasz, A., and Timar, A.: Analysis of ULF waves and SLAMS formation at Saturn, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2678, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2678, 2022.

14:00–14:05
|
EGU22-2110
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
|
Minyi Long, Xing Cao, Binbin Ni, Xudong Gu, Shengyi Ye, Zhonghua Yao, Siyuan Wu, and Yan Xu

Based on Cassini observations from 2004 to 2016, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the statistical distribution of the occurrence rate, averaged amplitude, wave normal angle (WNA), ellipticity and power spectral intensity of ion cyclotron waves in Saturn’s inner magnetosphere. Our results show that ion cyclotron waves mainly occur between the orbits of Enceladus and Dione near the equatorial region (λ<20°), with higher occurrence rates in the northern hemisphere than the southern hemisphere. The averaged wave amplitudes vary between 0.1–2 nT with a strong day-night asymmetry and a pronounced minimum at the equator. Saturnian ion cyclotron waves are predominantly left-handed polarized with small WNAs near the equator, and become linearly polarized with larger WNAs at higher latitudes. The major wave power occurs frequently at frequencies of 0.5-1.2 fw+, where fw+ is the equatorial gyrofrequency of H2O+ ions, with the strongest intensity (>~10 nT2/Hz) at L~6.5 statistically present in the midnight sector.

How to cite: Long, M., Cao, X., Ni, B., Gu, X., Ye, S., Yao, Z., Wu, S., and Xu, Y.: Statistical distribution of ion cyclotron waves in Saturn’s inner magnetosphere: A survey of Cassini measurements between 2004 and 2016, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2110, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2110, 2022.

14:05–14:10
|
EGU22-5912
|
On-site presentation
|
Anezina Solomonidou, Ashley Schoenfeld, Rosaly Lopes, Michael Malaska, Athena Coustenis, and Bernard Schmitt

The Soi crater region, an extensive region covering almost 10% of Titan’s surface, has the Soi crater in its middle, which is a relatively well-preserved crater on Titan.  This region includes the boundaries between the equatorial regions of Titan and the mid-latitudes, and extends into the high northern latitudes (above 50o). All these three Titan latitudes are dominated by different types of geomorphological units, such as dunes, mountains, and lakes, and are governed by different geological processes (such as lacustrine, aeolian and fluvial). An additional important and unique characteristic of the Soi crater region is that it includes 59 empty lakes, and the extent of these features reaches as far south as 40oN. We mapped this region at 1:800,000 scale and produced the first detailed geomorphological map of the region using the same methodology as presented by [1;2] and Schoenfeld et al. [3]. We included non-SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) data such as radiometry, ISS, and VIMS data in order to analyze vast areas not observed by SAR. We performed detailed VIMS analysis of hundreds of distinct regions for all geomorphological units with a radiative transfer technique [4] and a mixing model [5], to infer constraints on the composition. In our results, we introduce new geomorphological units, which were not seen in previous mapping of large Titan regions such as the Afekan and South Belet, and report the extensive presence of the scalloped plains units and their possible origin. A total of 10 craters, including Soi, are identified in this region, which are older than the plains and dune units. The radiative transfer analysis from VIMS showed that the major constituents covering the Soi crater region are compatible with water ice and organic alkane, alkene and alkyl-like stretch materials. We discuss our results in terms of origin and evolution theories.

[1] Malaska, M., et al. (2016), Icarus 270, 130; [2] Malaska, M., et al. (2020), Icarus, 344, 113764. [3] Schoenfeld, A., et al. (2021), Icarus 366, 114516. [4] Solomonidou, A., et al. (2020a), Icarus, 344, 113338; [5] Solomonidou, A., et al. (2020b), A&A 641, A16.

 

 

 

How to cite: Solomonidou, A., Schoenfeld, A., Lopes, R., Malaska, M., Coustenis, A., and Schmitt, B.: The Soi crater region on Titan: Detailed geomorphological and compositional maps, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5912, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5912, 2022.

Uranus and Neptune
14:10–14:15
|
EGU22-13077
|
Highlight
|
Virtual presentation
Olivier Mousis and David H. Atkinson and the Ice Giants team

The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets in our solar system, while planets of their size, the most frequent among exoplanets, represent a common outcome of planet formation.  Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ∼70% heavy elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter and Saturn. Because of the dearth of missions dedicated to their exploration, our knowledge of their composition and atmospheric processes is primarily derived from a single Voyager 2 flyby of each, complemented by subsequent remote sensing from Earth-based observatories, including space telescopes. As a result, Uranus's and Neptune's physical and atmospheric properties remain poorly constrained and their roles in the evolution of the Solar System are not well understood. Exploration of ice giant systems is therefore a high-priority science objective as these systems (which link together the magnetospheres, satellites, rings, atmosphere, and interior of these planets) challenge our understanding of planetary formation and evolution. Here we describe the main scientific goals to be addressed by future in situ exploration of an ice giant's atmosphere. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level, approximately 5 scale heights beneath the tropopause, would yield insight into two broad themes: i) the formation history of the ice giants and, in a broader extent, that of the Solar System, and ii) the processes governing the structure and composition of planetary atmospheres. The battery-powered probe would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics. In our favorite scenario, an Ice Giants orbiter performing a comprehensive exploration of the system would be used to deliver the probe to the atmosphere and to relay its data back to Earth. Following the successful architecture of the Cassini-Huygens mission, we envision that the probe would be delivered by ESA and the orbiter by NASA, with possible technical contributions of one Agency to the other's platform, on the basis of technical and programmatic considerations. The science payloads of the two platforms would be shared between NASA and ESA members states on the basis of scientific merit and technical/funding resources.

How to cite: Mousis, O. and Atkinson, D. H. and the Ice Giants team: In Situ Exploration of the atmospheres of the Ice Giants, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-13077, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-13077, 2022.

14:15–14:20
|
EGU22-9694
|
ECS
|
Presentation form not yet defined
An Assessment of the Role of Ionospheric Conductances in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Thermosphere Coupling at Giant Planets, Based on Space Data and Modelling Tools
(withdrawn)
Noe Clement, Sariah Al Saati, Michel Blanc, Yuxian Wang, Corentin Louis, Chihiro Tao, and Jean-Claude Gérard
14:20–14:25
|
EGU22-6614
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
|
Alex Akins, Mark Hofstadter, Bryan Butler, Edward Molter, and Imke de Pater

Our team is using radio observations of Uranus, collected with the Very Large Array (VLA) telescope, to track seasonal changes in the deep troposphere of Uranus between 1981 and the present. In Hofstadter, Akins, and Butler (https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1374), we reviewed evidence for seasonal changes in Uranus’ atmosphere from a record of VLA observations between 1981 and 2012. We found that large scale latitude structure has remained essentially similar for the bulk of the record with the exception of the pole-equator contrast differences between mid-summer observations in 1985 and late summer observations in 1994. This record has been extended to the present (close to ½ a Uranian year) with VLA observations in 2015 (published in Molter et al. 2021 https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abc48a) and in late 2021 (and early 2022). Here, we will discuss our analysis of data obtained between 2012 and the present. All observations during this period were made with the upgraded Jansky VLA receivers and thus obtain higher sensitivities than those obtained before this time. This sensitivity permits resolution of zonal banding in the deep atmosphere, with bands observed between 0 and 20 degrees with 2 K brightness temperature contrasts at depths between 1-10 bar. These variations are likely driven by small-scale circulation patterns and associated condensation effects similar to those associated with the large pole-to-equator variations. We will discuss the consistency of these datasets and inferred distribution of opacity sources (NH3 or H2S). As we approach winter solstice in 2030, it will be particularly important to monitor Uranus’ deep atmosphere to provide further evidence for near-solstice changes in the deep atmosphere structure or composition as a seasonal phenomenon. Confirmation would provide insight into how varying insolation due to Uranus’ obliquity drives atmospheric changes in a manner unlike other giant planets.

How to cite: Akins, A., Hofstadter, M., Butler, B., Molter, E., and de Pater, I.: Seasonal Change in the Deep Atmosphere of Uranus, 1981 to 2021, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-6614, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6614, 2022.

14:25–14:30
|
EGU22-10423
|
Presentation form not yet defined
Thibault Cavalié, Jonathan Lunine, and Venot Olivia

Understanding the processes that lead to the formation of giant planets in planetary systems is crucial, because these planets are the architects of more complex systems harbouring rocky planets that form over longer timescales. Measuring the deep elemental abundances of giant planets is one of the keys to constrain their formation. After the Galileo probe measurements at Jupiter, Juno is making observations to constrain the deep oxygen abundance of the planet. Fewer measurements are available at Saturn, and even more so at Uranus and Neptune. The lack of in situ probes or sensitive enough remote sensing measurements planned for these planets, thermochemical computations offers the means to help constrain the deep elemental abundances by reproducing the abundances of observable minor species which are chemically linked with the deep and main reservoirs of the main elements. This is particularly true for oxygen, which is mainly carried by water, a condensible species in giant planet atmospheres. Water ice trapped the other heavy elements during planetesimal formation beyond the snowline. The ratios between oxygen and the other elements bear implications on the form under which water condensed beyond the snowline (amorphous ice vs. clathrates). 
In this paper, we will present and discuss the results of our model for the solar system giant planets and compare the situations of gas vs. ice giant planets. 

How to cite: Cavalié, T., Lunine, J., and Olivia, V.: Thermochemical modeling of gas and ice giant planets, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-10423, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10423, 2022.

14:30–14:35
|
EGU22-2522
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Deniz Soyuer and Ravit Helled

Uranus and Neptune exhibit strong zonal winds reaching up to 200 m/s and 400 m/s relative to their assumed bulk rotation, respectively. Furthermore, recent studies show that planetary ices such as water and ammonia become ionically conducting under conditions present in the ice giants. With rapidly increasing electrical conductivity, zonal flows inevitably couple to the background magnetic field, inducing electrical currents and magnetic field perturbations spatially correlated with zonal flows. Induced currents generate Ohmic dissipation, which can be used to constrain the depth of the zonal winds via the energy/entropy flux throughout the planetary interior. Constraining the zonal wind decay can be used to estimate the strength of magnetic field perturbations. Flows coupled to the background magnetic field induce poloidal and toroidal field perturbations through the ω-effect. Toroidal perturbations are expected to diffuse downwards and produce poloidal fields through turbulent convection, which are comparable to those induced by the ω-effect.We present a method for calculating electrical conductivity profiles of ionically conducting H-He-H2O mixtures using results from ab-initio simulations. We then apply this prescription on several published interior structure models of Uranus and Neptune, assuming the heavy elements are represented by water. Structure models with higher water abundances (hot models) also have larger electrical conductivity values and their zonal winds need to decay faster compared to colder models. Using our solutions for the zonal wind decay, we estimate the strength of magnetic field perturbations induced by the zonal flows. We find that colder models could potentially have poloidal field perturbations that reach up to O(0.1) of the background magnetic field in the most extreme case. The possible existence of poloidal field perturbations spatially correlated with zonal flows could be used to constrain the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune.

How to cite: Soyuer, D. and Helled, R.: The Interplay between Zonal Winds and Magnetic Fields in Uranus and Neptune, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2522, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2522, 2022.

14:35–14:40
|
EGU22-5598
|
On-site presentation
|
Prasenjit Saha, Deniz Soyuer, Lorenz Zwick, and Daniel D'Orazio

Proposed missions to Uranus and Neptune usually involve a ∼10 year cruise time to the ice giants. This cruise time can be utilized to search for low-frequency gravitational waves (GWs) by observing the Doppler shift caused by them in the Earth-spacecraft radio link. We calculate the sensitivity of prospective ice giant missions to GWs, as well as that of past planetary missions which also searched for GWs. Then, adopting a steady-state black hole binary population, we derive a conservative estimate for the detection rate of extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs), supermassive- (SMBH) and stellar mass binary black hole (sBBH) mergers. For a total of ten 40-day observations during the cruise of a single spacecraft, approximately 0.5 detections of SMBH mergers are likely, if Allan deviation of Cassini-era noise is improved by ∼102 in the 10−5 − 10−3 Hz range. For EMRIs the number of detections lies between O(0.1) − O(100). Furthermore, ice giant missions combined with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) would improve the GW source localisation by an order of magnitude compared to LISA by itself. With a significant improvement in the total Allan deviation, a Doppler tracking experiment might become as capable as LISA at such low frequencies, and help bridge the gap between mHz detectors and Pulsar Timing Arrays. Thus, ice-giant missions could play a critical role in expanding the horizon of gravitational wave searches and maybe even be the first to detect the first SMBH merger.

How to cite: Saha, P., Soyuer, D., Zwick, L., and D'Orazio, D.: Ice-giant missions as gravitational-wave detectors, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-5598, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5598, 2022.

14:40–14:45
|
EGU22-2570
|
On-site presentation
|
Lorenz Zwick, Deniz Soyuer, and Prasenjit Saha

Future ice giant missions could be used to constrain the dark sector. Modifications to the third Kepler-law and deviations from the inverse square law of gravity can be tested by observing the extra perihelion precession of Uranus and Neptune, which allows probing the local dark matter density, modified gravity scenarios and Yukawa-like interactions. As of now, the extraprecession measurements of ice giants are done via ephemerides measurements, which have large uncertainties and provide looser constraints with respect to constraints by other planets. Current upper bound on the local dark matter density lies around ρDM ~ 10-20 g/cm3. However, Doppler tracking missions to Uranus and Neptune with radio ranging accuracy of a few meters can improve this upper bound by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude via the extraprecession technique. Moreover, estimates coming from the spacecraft cruise time energy budget could yield an even better estimate than the Doppler ephemerides measurements, potentially providing evidence for dark matter or shedding light on modified gravity scenarios. Therefore, in addition to planetary science, in situ exploration of Uranus and Neptune also carries significance for exploring the local dark sector and probing fundamental physics.

How to cite: Zwick, L., Soyuer, D., and Saha, P.: Local Constraints on the Dark Sector by Future Missions to Uranus and Neptune, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-2570, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2570, 2022.

14:45–14:50
|
EGU22-4149
|
ECS
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
|
Michael T. Roman, Leigh N. Fletcher, Glenn S. Orton, Thomas K. Greathouse, Julianne Moses, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Patrick G. J. Irwin, Yasumasa Kasaba, Takuya Fujiyoshi, Heidi B. Hammel, Imke de Pater, James Sinclair, and Arrate Antuñano

We present the primary results from our recent analyses of mid-infrared observations of Neptune and Uranus from ground-based telescopes, including VLT-VISIR, Subaru-COMICS, and Gemini-TEXES.  We discuss our recent discovery that Neptune’s stratospheric temperatures appear to be changing dramatically in just the past few years, following decades of cooling.  In contrast, we show that no evidence yet exists of long-term thermal changes in Uranus’ stratosphere, but mid-IR observations of Uranus are still extremely limited. We share new observations from VLT-VISIR, express the need for continued ground-based imaging, and discuss how the James Webb Space Telescope MIRI observations will help greatly advance our understanding of the Ice Giants in the years ahead.  

How to cite: Roman, M. T., Fletcher, L. N., Orton, G. S., Greathouse, T. K., Moses, J., Rowe-Gurney, N., Irwin, P. G. J., Kasaba, Y., Fujiyoshi, T., Hammel, H. B., de Pater, I., Sinclair, J., and Antuñano, A.: Mid-Infrared Observations of Neptune and Uranus: Recent Discoveries and Future Opportunities, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4149, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4149, 2022.