Detection and source location of the groundwater-induced seismic signal in karst using a combination of passive and active seismic approaches

Karst is a landscape with distinctive hydrology and landforms that arise when the underlying rock is soluble. Locating the flowing conduits and pathways in karst is important in terms of water resource management, groundwater flooding, geotechnical and engineering projects. Understanding flow pathways is particularly important for road and railway construction, so as not to adversely affect hydrological networks, in particular those associated with Turloughs.

The aim of this study was to develop methods for directly detecting energetic groundwater flow in sub-surface conduits through passive seismic applications, by detecting the small ground vibrations (seismic microtremor) that flowing water in the sub-surface may generate. This is in contrast to the current ‘traditional’ approach of attempting to actively image the conduits using geophysical and other methods, in order to determine the geometry of flow paths. The imagery of conduits in karst is a very difficult problem and determining if they contain flowing structures is also a very significant challenge using traditional methods, which is the motivation for developing a new approach to the problem.

We undertook experiments at two sites on karst in Ireland; one gently-sloping shallow conduit and one relatively deep and complex-structured conduit. We chose these sites as the caves had previously been dived and we had access to the shapefiles of these caves to ground-truth our findings.

We observed that subterranean flow-related micro-tremor in karst appears as persistent frequency bands on the spectrograms that vary with time and seismic station location with respect to the conduit. This persistent frequency is different than the soil resonating frequency and relates to the subterranean water flow in the conduits. Application of an Amplitude Location Method (ALM)  clearly delineated the conduit as the source of the micro-tremor.

We also conducted an active Airgun experiment at the second site to locate the conduit by tracking a pressure wave, using two arrays of surface seismic stations, as it propagated into the conduit. This combination of detecting and locating seismic microtremor generated by water flow in the conduits and the use of seismic array analysis to track active Airgun source pressure waves propagating at depth in conduits offers a new tool kit for karst hydrology determination. In the next step, we will assess the applicability of Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) using fiber optic cables as sensors for detecting sub-surface water flow, where we expect unrivaled spatial resolution of the flow-induced seismic wavefield. Such a study would be the first attempt to fill the current gap regarding an understanding of karst groundwater dynamics along the entire conduit pathway, at an exceptionally high spatial scale.