EGU23-10513
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10513
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

EMIC wave induced proton precipitation during the 27-28 May 2017 storm:Comparison of BATSRUS+RAM-SCB simulations with ground/space based observations

Shreedevi Porunakatu Radhakrishna1,2, Yiqun Yu2, Yoshizumi Miyoshi1, Xingbin Tian2, Minghui Zhu2, Sandeep Kumar1, Satoko Nakamura1, Chae-Woo Jun1, Masafumi Shoji1, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Vania Jordanova3, Tomoaki Hori1, Kazushi Asamura4, Iku Shinohara4, Shoichiro Yokota5, Satoshi Kasahara6, Kunihiro Keika6, Ayako Matsuoka7, Martin Connors8, and Akira Kadokura9
Shreedevi Porunakatu Radhakrishna et al.
  • 1Nagoya University, Institute for Space Earth Environment Research, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya, Japan (shreedevipr@gmail.com)
  • 2School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • 3Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States
  • 4ISAS/JAXA, Sagamihara, Japan
  • 5Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
  • 6University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 7Kyoto University, Japan
  • 8Athabasca University, Canada
  • 9National Institute of Polar Research, Japan

Recent studies have shown that the ion precipitation induced by EMIC waves can contribute significantly to the total energy flux deposited into the ionosphere and severely affect the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. During the geomagnetic storm of 27-28 May 2017, the ARASE and the RBSPa satellites observed typical signatures of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere. The DMSP and MetOp satellites observed enhanced proton precipitation during the main phase of the storm. In order to understand the evolution of proton precipitation into the ionosphere, its correspondence to the time and location of excitation of the EMIC waves and its relation to the source and distribution of proton temperature anisotropy, we conducted two simulations of the BATSRUS+RAMSCBE model with and without EMIC waves included. Simulation results suggest that the H- and He-band EMIC waves are excited within regions of strong temperature anisotropy of protons in the vicinity of the plasmapause. In regions where the Arase/RBSPa satellite measurements recorded EMIC wave activity, an increase in the simulated growth rates of H- and He-band EMIC waves is observed indicating that the model is able to capture the EMIC wave activity. The RAM-SCBE simulation with EMIC waves reproduces the precipitating fluxes in the premidnight sector fairly well, and is found to be in good agreement with the DMSP and MetOp satellite observations. The results suggest that the EMIC wave scattering of ring current ions gives rise to the proton precipitation in the premidnight sector at subauroral latitudes during the main phase of the 27 May 2017 storm.

How to cite: Porunakatu Radhakrishna, S., Yu, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Tian, X., Zhu, M., Kumar, S., Nakamura, S., Jun, C.-W., Shoji, M., Shiokawa, K., Jordanova, V., Hori, T., Asamura, K., Shinohara, I., Yokota, S., Kasahara, S., Keika, K., Matsuoka, A., Connors, M., and Kadokura, A.: EMIC wave induced proton precipitation during the 27-28 May 2017 storm:Comparison of BATSRUS+RAM-SCB simulations with ground/space based observations, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10513, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10513, 2023.