EGU23-10696, updated on 20 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10696
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

How important are secondary ice processes – preliminary results from FOR-ICE

Luisa Ickes1, Montserrat Costa Surós2, Patrick Eriksson1, Hannah Frostenberg1, Paraskevi Georgakaki3, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos2,4, Hanna Hallborn1, Anna Lewinschal5, Eleanor May1, Athanasios Nenes3,6, David Neubauer7, Carlos Pérez García-Pando2,8, Ulrike Proske7, and Georgia Sotiropoulou6
Luisa Ickes et al.
  • 1Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden (luisa.ickes@chalmers.se)
  • 2Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
  • 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 4Department of Project and Construction Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034, Barcelona, Spain
  • 5Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 6Center for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, 70013 Patras, Greece
  • 7Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 8ICREA, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, 08010 Barcelona, Spain

Global climate models poorly represent mixed-phase clouds, which leads to uncertainties in cloud radiative forcing and precipitation. In the FORCeS ice experiment (FOR-ICE) we compare three global climate models (ECHAM-HAM, NorESM, EC-Earth) and show which processes are crucial for a realistic representation of cloud ice and supercooled water in each global climate model framework using the factorial method as a statistical approach. A specific focus of the experiments is on secondary ice production (SIP) - which apart from one mechanism (rime splintering) is typically not represented in models, even if observations of ice crystal concentrations of ice crystal number in warm mixed-phase clouds often exceed available ice nuclei by orders of magnitude. We evaluate the importance of three SIP mechanisms combined (rime splintering, ice-ice collisions, and droplet shattering) compared to all other processes that can modulate ice mass and number in mixed-phase clouds: ice nucleation, sedimentation, and transport of ice crystals, and the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process. To describe SIP we adopt two approaches: an explicit microphysical representation of the processes, and a parameterization based on a random forest regression of high-resolution two-year simulations in the Arctic using the polar Weather Research and Forecast model (polar-WRF). Satellite observations are used to evaluate if including descriptions of SIP leads to a more realistic representation of mixed phase clouds.

How to cite: Ickes, L., Costa Surós, M., Eriksson, P., Frostenberg, H., Georgakaki, P., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Hallborn, H., Lewinschal, A., May, E., Nenes, A., Neubauer, D., Pérez García-Pando, C., Proske, U., and Sotiropoulou, G.: How important are secondary ice processes – preliminary results from FOR-ICE, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10696, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10696, 2023.