EGU23-11076
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11076
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Physical processes driving 'switching events'

Gabriela Clara Racz1, Kevin Mirng En Yeo, Aly Thobani, Sean Henry, Maryam Zarrinderakht1, Camilo Rada2, and Christian Schoof1
Gabriela Clara Racz et al.
  • 1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia
  • 2Centro de Investigación GAIA Antárticah, Universidad de Magallanes

Commonly, the parts of the glacier bed that are hydraulically connected to the surface experience significant diurnal variations in water pressure, in response to cycles of surface melting. Closely spaced points on the bed often exhibit nearly identical temporal variations in water pressure, suggesting that they are connected not only to the surface but to each other through conduits along the bed. This behaviour is typically observed directly through instrumented boreholes drilled to the glacier bed. A ‘switching event’ occurs when one of a pair of boreholes abruptly changes from being connected, in the sense of exhibiting the same diurnal oscillations as the other borehole, to being disconnected, or vice versa. A switching event is indicative of a connection through a subglacial conduit being closed, or opened, and therefore provides a limited but highly specific window into the evolution of subglacial conduits and permeability.

However, in most subglacial drainage models, conduits are not represented individually but averaged over a small area of the bed to produce a macroporous continuum representation as a ‘water sheet’, quantified by a mean conduit depth h. The most common assumption is that the water sheet consists of linked cavities and that these open due to basal sliding over bed roughness, and close due to viscous creep (e.g. Hewitt, 2011). Within that framework, the simplest mechanism for a switching event is that a connection is established or closed when the sheet thickness h passes through some percolation threshold hc (Rada and Schoof, 2018).

We want to test whether the observed switching events can be explained by that mechanism, which in turn implies that two conditions must be met: water sheet depth indeed evolves according to a competition between opening due to basal sliding and creep closure, and that a simple threshold in h suffices to capture the geometric complexity involved in creating or closing connections at the bed.

In a large dataset of borehole water-pressure time series, we identify borehole pairs that exhibit strong evidence of switching behaviour. We assume that switching events can be described by the evolution of a water sheet, with connections between boreholes being opened and closed as sheet thickness passes through a threshold value as described above. We use the switching event catalogue we have created to invert for parameters in the sheet evolution model using a binary indicator function for connectedness to compute the model data mismatch in the absence of any other direct measures of sheet thickness.

This procedure allows us to capture the majority of observed switching events with plausible parameter values. The exception is a set of short-lived periods of connectedness characterized by switching events that are clustered in space and time. In a complementary study (Racz et al, 2023 in prep.), we, therefore, investigate if this class of switching events can instead be explained by an alternative mechanism in which the sudden resumption of surface water supply, following a period of snow cover, drives the propagation of a hydrofracture (e.g. Tsai and Rice 2010, 2012).

How to cite: Racz, G. C., Yeo, K. M. E., Thobani, A., Henry, S., Zarrinderakht, M., Rada, C., and Schoof, C.: Physical processes driving 'switching events', EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-11076, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11076, 2023.