EGU23-11710
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11710
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Deterministic and Stochastic Chaos characterise Laboratory Earthquakes

Adriano Gualandi1,2, Davide Faranda3,4,5, Chris Marone6,7, Massimo Cocco8, and Gianmarco Mengaldo9,10
Adriano Gualandi et al.
  • 1Osservatorio Nazionale Terremoti, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy (adriano.geolandi@gmail.com)
  • 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, University of Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
  • 4London Mathematical Laboratory, London, UK
  • 5Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
  • 6Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, La Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
  • 7Department of Geosciences, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA
  • 8Sezione Roma 1, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy
  • 9Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 10Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, London, UK

We analyze frictional motion for a laboratory fault as it passes through the stability transition from stable sliding to unstable motion. We study frictional stick-slip events, which are the lab equivalent of earthquakes, via dynamical system tools in order to retrieve information on the underlying dynamics and to assess whether there are dynamical changes associated with the transition from stable to unstable motion. We find that the lab seismic cycles exhibit characteristics of a low-dimensional system with average dimension similar to that of natural slow earthquakes (<5). We also investigate local properties of the attractor and find maximum instantaneous dimension >10, indicating that some regions of the phase space require a high number of degrees of freedom (dofs). Our analysis does not preclude deterministic chaos, but the lab seismic cycle is best explained by a random attractor based on rate- and state-dependent friction whose dynamics is stochastically perturbed. We find that minimal variations of 0.05% of the shear and normal stresses applied to the experimental fault influence the large-scale dynamics and the recurrence time of labquakes. While complicated motion including period doubling is observed near the stability transition, even in the fully unstable regime we do not observe truly periodic behavior. Friction's nonlinear nature amplifies small scale perturbations, reducing the predictability of the otherwise periodic macroscopic dynamics. As applied to tectonic faults, our results imply that even small stress field fluctuations (less or about 150 kPa) can induce coefficient of variations in earthquake repeat time of a few percent. Moreover, these perturbations can drive an otherwise fast-slipping fault, close to the critical stability condition, into a mixed behavior involving slow and fast ruptures.

How to cite: Gualandi, A., Faranda, D., Marone, C., Cocco, M., and Mengaldo, G.: Deterministic and Stochastic Chaos characterise Laboratory Earthquakes, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-11710, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11710, 2023.