EGU23-120
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-120
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Use of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in linear and non-linear light use efficiency models for remote estimation of plant photosynthesis

Maria Pilar Cendrero-Mateo*1, Shari Van Wittenberghe1, Valero Laparra1, Uwe Rascher2, Shirley A. Papuga3, Guillermo Ponce-Campos4, and Jose F. Moreno1
Maria Pilar Cendrero-Mateo* et al.
  • 1Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • 2Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Science, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • 3Department of Environmental Science and Geology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
  • 4The University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and Environment, Tucson, AZ, USA

In this study, we address two relevant gaps when monitoring plant photosynthesis using remote sensing techniques; these are i) assess the seasonal trends and relationships observed between photosynthesis, optical vegetation indices, and chlorophyll fluorescence in crop systems and ii) evaluate the contribution of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) on linear and non-linear light-use efficiency-based (LUE) models for the remote estimation of plant photosynthesis. Coincident measurements of net plant photosynthesis (Anet), optical vegetation indices (i.e., Red edge index and photochemical reflectance index (PRI) among others), PSII operating efficiency (ΦPSII), and SIF were made at leaf level once a week in a wheat field under different nitrogen treatments. In LUE models, three key variables explain the seasonal variability of photosynthesis; these are the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR), LUE, and a correction factor related to meteorological conditions that limit LUE. In this study, the Red edge index was highly correlated with fAPAR (R2>0.70, p-value<0.05); however, neither PRI nor SIF were able to explain the seasonal changes of LUE (R2<0.10).  ΦPSII seasonal values (0.10 – 0.40) measured during the experiment indicated strong downregulation of the photosynthetic machinery. This explained why, in this study, SIF did not present a linear relationship with LUE. Our results confirmed that under stress conditions the non-photochemical quenching mechanisms (NPQ) control the energy dissipation pathway, breaking the linear relationship between photochemistry and fluorescence. Additionally, our study proved that changes in Anet could be better explained when optical vegetation indices, chlorophyll fluorescence, and meteorological conditions are combined in non-linear LUE-based models (R2 increased from 0.10 for the linear model to 0.60 for the non-linear model). These results confirmed the need to build non-linear models for the remote quantification of photosynthesis.

How to cite: Cendrero-Mateo*, M. P., Van Wittenberghe, S., Laparra, V., Rascher, U., Papuga, S. A., Ponce-Campos, G., and Moreno, J. F.: Use of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in linear and non-linear light use efficiency models for remote estimation of plant photosynthesis, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-120, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-120, 2023.