EGU23-12107
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12107
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Seismic Monitoring of Permafrost Dynamics at Mt. Zugspitze (German/Austrian Alps)

Fabian Lindner1, Krystyna Smolinski2, Riccardo Scandroglio3, Andreas Fichtner2, and Joachim Wassermann1
Fabian Lindner et al.
  • 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (flindner@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de)
  • 2Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Landslides Research Group, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

As observed elsewhere on a global scale, mountain permafrost at the Zugspitze (German/Austrian Alps) is degrading in response to climate change, which affects the rock slope stability and thus the hazard potential. Recent studies suggest that passive seismology is a promising and emerging tool to monitor permafrost changes as the seismic velocity of rocks strongly decreases/increases upon thawing/freezing. Compared to other, more classical methods like borehole temperature logging or electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), seismology is less laborious and costly, non-invasive and allows continuous monitoring. At Mt. Zugspitze, we exploit these advantages using a permanent seismic station (installed in 2006) as well as three small seismic arrays and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS; both available since summer/fall 2021), to infer permafrost dynamics with high spatio-temporal resolution. The seismic data show repeating diurnal noise generated by the operation of cable cars, which we leverage for cross-correlation analysis. Our results suggest that the dominant signal in the retrieved seismic velocity change time series is caused by the seasonal freeze-thaw cycles associated with permafrost bodies on the northern side of the mountain ridge. On the long-term, the time series show a gradual velocity decrease associated with permafrost degradation due to atmospheric warming and compare well with modeled velocity change time series using rock temperature data from a nearby borehole, which intersects the mountain ridge. We discuss differences in our seismic analysis results obtained from direct and coda waves as well as from single station to station pairs and DAS and interpret the results in the light of other measurements including ERT, rock temperature logging and meteorological parameters.

How to cite: Lindner, F., Smolinski, K., Scandroglio, R., Fichtner, A., and Wassermann, J.: Seismic Monitoring of Permafrost Dynamics at Mt. Zugspitze (German/Austrian Alps), EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12107, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12107, 2023.

Corresponding supplementary materials formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.