EGU23-12320
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12320
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Lava – substrate interaction: constraints on perlitic hydration and low temperature mineralization, Lebuj rhyolitic flow, Tokaj Mountains, Carpathian-Pannonian region

János Szepesi1,2, Alessandro Vona3, István János Kovács4, Krisztián Fintor5, Kata Molnár1, Alex Scarani3, Guido Giordano3,6, and Réka Lukács2,7,8
János Szepesi et al.
  • 1Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Debrecen (ELKH), Hungary (szepeja@gmail.com)
  • 2MTA-ELTE Volcanology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Budapest, Hungary
  • 3Dipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi Tre Rome, Italy (4
  • 4Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, (ELKH), Hungary
  • 5Vulcano Petrology and Geochemistry Research Group, Department of Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Petrology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • 6Instituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Montelibretti, Italy
  • 7Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, (ELKH), Budapest, Hungary
  • 8CSFK, MTA Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary

The silicic flows and domes can impose mechanical and thermal stress on the underlying substrate causing mineralization and lithification of granular bodies. In addition, the released water from the permeable substrate as dominant volatile species can contribute to the glass hydration of the flow. This fluid-lava interaction can be directly studied in ancient successions with exposed contacts. The Lebuj flow (Tokaj Mountains, Hungary) developed in a Miocene caldera setting, where the erosion revealed its basal zone including lava-substrate interaction textures. The main textural units comprise (1) a rhyolitic lava flow (F1: perlitic glass with obsidian marekanite, F2: microcrystalline-glass transition and F3: a basal breccia layer) and (2) the underlying mixed substrate unit (S1: massive rhyolite and breccia S2: enclosed partially sintered rhyolite tuff). The thin section textural analyses were completed by BSE imaging, Raman mapping (SiO2 polymorphs) and FTIR spot measurement (perlite H2O, clays). Glass transition temperature (Tg) was estimated using the chemical based GRD model.

The flow margin contacted with underlying volcanoclastic deposits along a steeply inclined (50-75°) plane with subordinate fragmentation. The substrate suffered re-heating by the flow where porosity loss and welding (solid-state sintering) occurred. The silica polymorphs are observed growing into open pore spaces and fractures and interpreted as precipitates from vapor phase fluids passing through the permeable lithologies. The smectite group minerals typically record acidic type alteration, where the water-rock interaction commonly produces glass replacement minerals. The FTIR-identified clays (mixed layer kaolinite/montmorillonite or beidellite) indicate low-to medium alteration degree (estimated temperature between 50-100 °C).

The lithophysae, spherulites and microcrystalline bands in the flow unit are textural evidence for prolonged groundmass crystallization above Tg. The relict obsidian grains in the glass are proofs of an incomplete hydration process. The FTIR and BSE investigations demonstrate the presence of sharp transitions from the hydrated ~3 wt.% perlitic rims to non-hydrated obsidian cores.

Textural and mineralogical evidence suggest that the following series of events occurred as the consequences of the lava-substrate interaction: a) a viscous rhyolite flow advanced on an irregular topography; b) shear and brittle fracturing occurred at the contact; c) groundmass crystallization (above Tg, ~ 690-715 °C) and hydration (below Tg) acted in the flow; d) low temperature mineralization and variable scale sintering occurred in the substrate (below Tg). According to the fluid exchange model beneath silicic lava domes (Ball et al. 2015), the water – rock interaction resulted in weak hydrothermal alteration of the substrate and water flux to the quenched glass (flow). As an interaction of the two processes, the increased sintering and mineralization reduced the porosity of the substrate which probably restricted further water uptake for hydration. Thus the obsidian results from a ‘quenched’ hydration front (Bindeman and Lowenstern 2016).

 

Ball J.L., Stauffer P.H., Calder E.S., Valentine G.A. (2015). Bull Volcanol 77:1–16.

Bindeman I.N., Lowenstern J.B.  (2016).  Contrib to Mineral Petrol 171:89

 

Aknowledgements

This research has been funded by the Hungarian–Italian MTA-CNR bilateral research project 2019–2022. The research was also supported by Development and Innovation Office–NKFIH No. 131869 OTKA project. RL was supported by the Bolyai János Research Fellowship.

How to cite: Szepesi, J., Vona, A., Kovács, I. J., Fintor, K., Molnár, K., Scarani, A., Giordano, G., and Lukács, R.: Lava – substrate interaction: constraints on perlitic hydration and low temperature mineralization, Lebuj rhyolitic flow, Tokaj Mountains, Carpathian-Pannonian region, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12320, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12320, 2023.