EGU23-12323
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12323
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Atmospheric contribution of nanoplastics to rural and remote surface waters

Dusan Materic1,2, Mike Peacock3,4, Joshua Dean5, Martyn Futter3, Trofim Maximov6, Filip Moldan7, Thomas Röckmann2, and Rupert Holzinger2
Dusan Materic et al.
  • 1Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig, Germany (dusan.materic@ufz.de)
  • 2Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 4Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • 5School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • 6Institute for Biological Problems of the Cryolithozone, Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia
  • 7IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Göteborg, Sweden

There is growing evidence for global environmental pollution caused by plastic particles <1 µm, here referred to as nanoplastics. Nanoplastic concentrations have been below the detection limits of many methods for quite some time, and thus they have passed undetected in complex environmental samples. However, recently using Thermal Desorption – Proton Transfer Reaction – Mass Spectrometry, many common nanosized polymers have been detected in seawater, ice and snow of rural and remote sites. In this work, we focused on the waterbodies of two contrasting sites: remote Siberian Arctic tundra and a forest landscape in southern Sweden. Nanoplastics of four polymer types (polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate) were detected in all sampled Swedish lakes and streams (mean 563 µg/L, seven lakes, four streams). The amount of nanoplastic polymers showed a correlation with plastic demand in Europe (R2 = 0.91). In Siberia, two nanoplastic polymers (PVC and polystyrene) were detected in lakes, ponds and surface flooding, and concentrations were lower (mean 51 µg/L, three lakes, five ponds, overland flow from thawing permafrost and flooded tundra). Based on potential source analysis and HYSPLIT modelling of air mass trajectories and particle dispersion, we infer that nanoplastics predominantly arrive at both sites by atmospheric deposition from local and regional sources.

How to cite: Materic, D., Peacock, M., Dean, J., Futter, M., Maximov, T., Moldan, F., Röckmann, T., and Holzinger, R.: Atmospheric contribution of nanoplastics to rural and remote surface waters, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12323, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12323, 2023.