EGU23-12579, updated on 09 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12579
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Soil carbon-sequestration and climate mitigation – definitions and their implications

Felix Seidel1, Axel Don1, Claire Chenu2, Daria Seitz1, Thomas Kätterer3, and Jens Leifeld4
Felix Seidel et al.
  • 1Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Germany (axel.don@thuenen.de, felix.seidel@thuenen.de)
  • 2Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France (claire.chenu@inrae.fr)
  • 3Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden (Thomas.Katterer@slu.se)
  • 4Agroscope, Zürich, Switzerland (jens.leifeld@agroscope.admin.ch)

Carbon sequestration has become a buzz word and generates large expectations on ecosystems to take up carbon (C) from the atmosphere. These so-called negative emissions could compensate greenhouse gas emissions and help to stabilise the global climate.  However, the term C sequestration is often misleadingly used fostering biased conclusions and exaggerated expectations. C sequestration is defined as net uptake of C from the atmosphere. Soils have a particularly large potential to take up C yet many soils currently continuously loose C. Measures to build up soil C may only reduce soil C losses (C loss mitigation) but will not result in a net C sequestration. While checking 100 recent papers we found only 5% correctly using the term C sequestration. Even worse, 13% of the papers used C sequestration equivalent to soil C stocks. Here we call for a rigorous and concise use of the term C sequestration and discuss implications of misleading applications.

How to cite: Seidel, F., Don, A., Chenu, C., Seitz, D., Kätterer, T., and Leifeld, J.: Soil carbon-sequestration and climate mitigation – definitions and their implications, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12579, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12579, 2023.