EGU23-12635
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12635
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Extreme value statistics of erosive rainfall events – a comparative assessment for agricultural production zones in Austria

Nur Banu Ozcelik1, Stefan Strohmeier2, Cristina Vásquez2, Christine Stumpp2, Andreas Klik2, Peter Strauß3, Georg Pistotnik4, Shuiqing Yin5, Tomas Dostal6, and Gregor Laaha1
Nur Banu Ozcelik et al.
  • 1University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, Institute of Statistics, Vienna, Austria (nurbanu.oezcelik@boku.ac.at)
  • 2University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute for Soil Physics and Rural Water Management, Vienna, Austria
  • 3Federal Agency for Water Management Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Petzenkirchen, Austria
  • 4Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Vienna, Austria
  • 5School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
  • 6Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

In our ACRP funded project EROS-A we aim at a comprehensive analysis of the erosive energy of rainfall, estimated soil loss, and reported damage using statistical and process-based methods. In this particular study, we evaluate the return periods of erosive rainfall events at 26 meteorological stations in Austria. The main focus is on daily cumulative rainfall and the maximum 30-min rainfall intensity (I30) as these were identified as key parameters for rainfall erosivity assessment. The extreme value series were obtained using both the Annual Maxima Series (AMS) and Peak Over Threshold (POT) approach, in order to assess which of the methods will be most accurate. The assumptions of stationarity and independence of the extreme value series were carefully checked using statistical trend and independence tests and no significant deviations were found.

Generalized extreme value (GEV) and generalized Pareto (GPD) probability distributions were fitted using L-moment and maximum likelihood procedures. The GEV distribution is suited for AMS or block maxima data, whereas the GPD is suited for the POT series. For the obtained GEV and GPD models we examined extreme events with return periods of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years. We found that threshold selection is crucial for the POT, with diagnostic tools (such as mean residual life plots) not being fully decisive. Finally sensitivity analysis was performed where convergence of the fitted GPD to the GEV (AMS approach) helped determining robust thresholds for the GPD. The results show that the POT approach for daily cumulative precipitation is the most accurate in 69% of the cases and the AMS approach in 8% of the cases (different return periods and stations), while they have similar performance in 23% of the cases. Similar results are obtained for I30, were the success rates are 80% for the POT, 8% for the AMS and 12% for similar performance. In the next step, we will extend frequency analysis to a regional context, in order to map extreme rainfall erosivity across main agricultural production zones in Austria.

How to cite: Ozcelik, N. B., Strohmeier, S., Vásquez, C., Stumpp, C., Klik, A., Strauß, P., Pistotnik, G., Yin, S., Dostal, T., and Laaha, G.: Extreme value statistics of erosive rainfall events – a comparative assessment for agricultural production zones in Austria, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12635, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12635, 2023.