EGU23-12749
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12749
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Numerical simulation of fault zone permeability enhancement by chemical stimulation operation at the Eden geothermal projects, UK

Mrityunjay Singh1, Claire Bossennec1, Kristian Bär2, John Reinecker2, Robbie Bilsland3, Chris Briggs3, Lucy Cotton4, Jon Gutmanis4, Tony Bennet3, Jörg Baumgärtner5, Augusta Grand3, Nils Recalde Lummer6, Omair Rauf6, Clément Baujard7, Albert Genter7, and Ingo Sass1,8
Mrityunjay Singh et al.
  • 1Technical University Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Chair of Geothermal Science and Technology, Germany (mrityunjay.singh@tu-darmstadt.de)
  • 2Vulcan Energie Subsurface Solutions GmbH, 76227, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 3Eden Geothermal Limited, PL24 2SG, UK
  • 4GeoScience Limited, TR11 4SZ, UK
  • 5Bestec GmbH, 76870, Germany
  • 6Fangmann Energy Services, 29410, Germany
  • 7Électricité de Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • 8Section 4.8 Geoenergie, GFZ Potsdam, 14473, Germany

To increase fluid flow and thus obtain higher heat production from a geothermal well, chemical stimulation can be performed in their open-hole sections. Through chemical stimulation, fracture zone permeability in the vicinity of the borehole can be enhanced which results in higher fluid connectivity from the well to the reservoir fracture network. To understand the chemical stimulation effect on fault zone permeability enhancement and pressure development, the Eden geothermal project acted as a demonstration site in the framework of the MEET project. The open-hole section of the Eden geothermal project was characterized based on drill cutting analysis, several borehole geophysical logs including (Spectral Gamma Ray, Caliper, Borehole Image, etc.) as well as hydraulic testing. These hydraulic injection tests were carried out from January to March 2022 in the form of several low injection tests, where fluid was injected in a series of flow rates ranging from 5 – 15 l/s. Furthermore, a chemical stimulation test was performed in August-September 2022 followed by another series of hydraulic injection and production tests until late November 2022 at flow rates of 5 – 12.5 l/s. Rock cuttings from the target zone (3940 m TVD) indicated up to 3% of calcite which is easily dissolvable by acids. Therefore, the chemical stimulation was primarily aimed to treat possible near-wellbore damage resulting from an LCM cementation carried out during the drilling of the well in 2021, prior to installing the production casing.

Especially at high temperatures, commonly employed HCl tends to treat only near wellbore regions and show high corrosivity against metal tubular. To counteract such drawbacks, the strong organic acid system SSB-007 was used for chemical stimulation [1]. The two hydraulic injection test series of spring and autumn 2022 are compared against a coupled hydro-thermal numerical simulation solved using a finite element discretization approach in COMSOL Multiphysics. To numerically model the Eden geothermal system, a cubical reservoir including the well trajectory and casing design, and four individual fault zones are considered at a depth between 3830 m and 4280 m TVD. Due to similarity in the geological context on the regional level, permeability, porosity, and other petrophysical parameters of the faulted and matrix properties of the Cornubian granites are considered based on the United Downs geothermal reservoir [2,3]. Initially, the permeability and porosity of the fault zone and matrix are calibrated using the spring hydraulic testing data. Later, the downhole pressure evolution of the spring and autumn injection tests is compared to qualitatively understand any permeability enhancement. Initial results indicate that up to 20% of fault zone permeability enhancement was achieved by the chemical stimulation operation. Future reservoir characterization would be helpful for developing more accurate geochemical models predicting permeability enhancement.

1. Lummer, N.R., Rauf, O. and Gerdes, S., 2015, June. https://doi.org/10.2118/174242-MS.

2. Mahmoodpour, S., Singh, M., Obaje, C., Tangirala, S.K., Reinecker, J., Bär, K. and Sass, I., 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12080296.

3. Reinecker, J., Gutmanis, J., Foxford, A., Cotton, L., Dalby, C. and Law, R., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102226.

How to cite: Singh, M., Bossennec, C., Bär, K., Reinecker, J., Bilsland, R., Briggs, C., Cotton, L., Gutmanis, J., Bennet, T., Baumgärtner, J., Grand, A., Recalde Lummer, N., Rauf, O., Baujard, C., Genter, A., and Sass, I.: Numerical simulation of fault zone permeability enhancement by chemical stimulation operation at the Eden geothermal projects, UK, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-12749, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12749, 2023.