EGU23-13589, updated on 28 Apr 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13589
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods and their value for comparing denitrification models

Jesús Carrera and Jordi Petchamé
Jesús Carrera and Jordi Petchamé
  • CSIC, IDAEA, Barcelona, Spain (jesus.carrera.ramirez@gmail.com)

Numerous methods exist to gain insight on a model performance. Sensitivity analysis (SA) tools provide information on how a model output depends on model parameters. It is widely argued that SA is an essential tool for assessing model uncertainty. Here, I review global SA using Variogram Analysis of Response Surfaces (VARS), variance-based methods (Sobol' indices) and polynomial chaos expansion. For the comparison, we use a set of denitrification models, which are needed to assess the fate of nitrate, a global challenge. For each of the models, we assess the uncertainty and reliability of predictions, and the use of SA tools in designing experiments to reduce model uncertainty.

How to cite: Carrera, J. and Petchamé, J.: A comparison of sensitivity analysis methods and their value for comparing denitrification models, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13589, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13589, 2023.