EGU23-16429
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-16429
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Highlighting the metasomatic impact on mottled UG-2 chromitites from the Bushveld Complex (South Africa)  by large-scale µEDXRF mapping.

Dieter Rammlmair1, Wilhelm Nikonow2, and Simon Goldmann2
Dieter Rammlmair et al.
  • 1Mineralogy, University Hannover, Hannover, Germany (d.rammlmair@mineralogie.uni-hannover.de)
  • 2BGR, B2.1, Hannover, Germany

The use of µEDXRF elemental mapping provides access to data on relatively large core sections within a reasonable time at high spatial resolution down to 20 µm, enabling to link macroscopic to microscopic information, and providing an objective tool to select areas of interest for more sophisticated data acquisition by EPMA, LA-ICP-MS etc. Textural features can be visualized, that hardly are identified with the naked eye e.g. interstitial silicates in massive chromitites of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. The application of automated mineralogy provides access to local paragenetic changes and to modal analyses of selected areas. Automated mineralogy based on µEDXRF has to overcome a number of obstacles due to aspects of diffraction, depth of information and grain boundary effects. Tools have been developed to limit these aspects within an acceptable error frame by combining the information of two opposing detectors to reduce the side effects of diffraction. By applying a supervised endmember based classification using the spectral angle mapper algorithm of the ENVI hyperspectral software, phase distribution maps can be produced. Within a well-known system such as the UG-2 chromitite mineral names can be attributed to the identified phases. Exceptions exist for very fine grained secondary phases which might show mixed signals. Well-identified phases can be segmented and grain size, shape and orientation of individual grains can be obtained supported by diffraction signals of single grains. Chemical information can further be extracted for individual minerals, individual grains and bulk area corresponding to the modal mineralogy for any selected area. This offers a new approach to interprete (Verb fehlt?) complex textures by comparing chemical and mineralogical aspects of individual textural pattern. The example of mottled UG-2 chromite shows that the hosting silicates of the chromititebasically orthopyroxene and anorthite-rich plagioclase, but within stringers phlogopite, anorthite-poor plagioclase, potassic feldspar, amphibole, quartz with local enrichment of apatite and sulphides, show differences in grain size and chemistry of the chromite. EPMA investigations on chromite show that Cr/(Cr+Al), Mg/(Mg+Fe), and Cr/Fe is controlled by the chemistry of its hosting oikocryst silicates plagioclase or orthopyroxene. The appearance of late inter-oikocryst phlogopites induces a metasomatic loss of titanium in the chromite. By applying several steps of µEDXRF data reduction and phase masking, these changes in chromite chemistry can be visualized despite of the relatively large spot size of 20 µm for large areas. Using this information the metasomatic impact within a continuously µEDXRF mapped half drill core can be visualized and quantified. 

How to cite: Rammlmair, D., Nikonow, W., and Goldmann, S.: Highlighting the metasomatic impact on mottled UG-2 chromitites from the Bushveld Complex (South Africa)  by large-scale µEDXRF mapping., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-16429, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-16429, 2023.