Mitigating the hydropeaking using flow refuge: an experimental case-study
- 1Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (isabelboavida@tecnico.ulisboa.pt)
- 2Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (renanleite@edu.ulisboa.pt)
- 3Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (mariajcosta@tecnico.ulisboa.pt)
- 4Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (anthony.merianne@grenoble-inp.org)
- 5Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (dmameri@outlook.pt)
- 6Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (fafonso@fmv.ulisboa.pt)
- 7Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (jmsantos@isa.ulisboa.pt)
- 8Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (antonio.pinheiro@tecnico.ulisboa.pt)
The artificial pulsed flows occurring downstream of hydropower plants due to electricity demand, i.e. hydropeaking, affect habitat selection by fish. This effect is particularly unknown for cyprinids, which are the most representative freshwater fish family in European rivers. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of two types of flow-refuge by Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei) at an indoor flume (6.5m x 0.7m x 0.8m) as a potential solution to mitigate the effects of pulsed flows associated to hydropower production. Based on previous comprehensive research conducted on cyprinids and with the results of this study, the best type of flow-refuge was selected, up-scaled and implemented downstream of small hydropower plants. Two different approach angles with the flume wall - 45⁰ and 70⁰ - were tested to assess the effectiveness of the created hydraulic conditions on attracting fish to the flow-refuge. For each type we tested a base flow event (7 l.s-1), simulating river natural conditions, and a peak flow event (60 l.s-1), simulating pulsed flows. For each setting, two flow-refuges (downstream and upstream) were installed in the flume and tested with a school of five Iberian barbels. The utility of the flow-refuges was assessed by the frequency and time of use by fish at two distinct flow-refuge locations i.e., downstream (area between the flume and the adjacent flow-refuge walls), and inside (the effective covered area of the flow-refuge). Blood glucose and lactate levels were quantified to identify potential physiological adjustments associated with the pulsed flows and the flow-refuge type. Preliminary results indicate that fish behavior differs according to flow event and the type of flow-refuge. The frequency of a single fish using the flow-refuge was higher in the 45⁰ refuge during pulsed flows than in the 70⁰. Overall, the average time spent inside the flow-refuges was higher during pulsed flows for both types and higher in the 45⁰ refuge. After the 60 l.s-1 events, the blood glucose and lactate levels were higher than in the 7 l.s-1 events. In addition, lactate levels for the 45⁰ flow-refuge during the 60 l.s-1 events, were the highest when compared to 7 l.s-1 events. These results may be explained by the higher velocities created in the presence of the 45⁰ flow-refuge, shown by ADV results, that favoured individual use and rheotactic behaviour, setting off physiological adjustments, increasing residency time and the efficiency to use the flow-refuge.
How to cite: Boavida, I., Leite, R., Costa, M. J., Merianne, A., Mameri, D., Afonso, F., Santos, J. M., and Pinheiro, A.: Mitigating the hydropeaking using flow refuge: an experimental case-study, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-16568, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-16568, 2023.