EGU23-1859
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-1859
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Water table depth assimilation in integrated terrestrial system models at the larger catchment scale

Fang Li1,2, Wolfgang Kurtz3, Ching Pui Hung1,2, Harry Vereecken1,2, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen1,2
Fang Li et al.
  • 1Agrosphere Institute, IBG-3, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • 2Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems: HPSC TerrSys, Geoverbund ABC/J, Leo-Brandt-Strasse, 52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 3Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (LRZ) of the Bavarian Academy of Science and Humanities, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany

As a vital supply of water resources for human society, groundwater plays a significant part in the water cycle, and is closely linked to precipitation, surface water and soil moisture (SM). Groundwater modelling often suffers from a variety of uncertainties, including uncertain forcing data, parameters and initial conditions. To reduce the uncertainties of model predictions, data assimilation (DA) can be used to correct model predictions with observations to improve the estimation of unknown states and parameters. To investigate the effects of assimilation of groundwater data into the integrated model Terrestrial System Modelling Platform (TSMP) on groundwater table depth (WTD) simulations, groundwater assimilation experiments were conducted for the Rur catchment in Germany. 128 ensemble members were generated by perturbing atmospheric forcing variables and saturated hydraulic conductivity, and then the measured daily groundwater data from 2018 were assimilated into the model TSMP by the Localized Ensemble Kalman Filter (LEnKF). The measured data were screened rigorously before assimilation. The spatial autocorrelation analysis of the measured groundwater data and the open loop (OL) simulations showed consistency in the spatial variability of groundwater levels between measurements and simulations. Based on the results of a spatial autocorrelation analysis, three different local radii (10 km, 5 km and 2.5 km) were selected for the assimilation experiments. Comparing the results of the OL and DA experiments, the simulated WTD bias (simulated - measured) and root mean square error (RMSE) were reduced for all DA runs compared to OL. The 10km localization radius gives the smallest RMSE at assimilation locations, with 81% RMSE reduction compared to the OL. Validation with WTD data from independent verification sites shows that localized assimilation improves groundwater simulations only when the distance to assimilated sites is smaller than 2.5km. Independent WTD validation showed a reduction in RMSE of 30% and the best results were from the DA run with 10 km radius. Also soil moisture measurements from the Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensor (CRNS) were used for validation. The simulated SM reproduced the observed temporal fluctuations, with a high correlation between measured and simulated SM (from 0.70 to 0.89, except for the Wuestebach site). However, there was no RMSE reduction of SM for the DA runs compared to the OL.

How to cite: Li, F., Kurtz, W., Hung, C. P., Vereecken, H., and Hendricks Franssen, H.-J.: Water table depth assimilation in integrated terrestrial system models at the larger catchment scale, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-1859, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-1859, 2023.