Evaluation of continental-scale ensemble hydrological forecasts from Environment and Climate Change Canada: a comparison with forecasts from the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS)
- 1Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, Canada (vincent.fortin@ec.gc.ca)
- 2Canadian Centre for Meteorological and Environmental Prediction, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, Québec, Canada
- 3National Hydrological Services, Environment and Climate Change Canada
- 4Civil and Building Engineering Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 5Forecast Department, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) is in the process of deploying a continental-scale hydrological prediction system known as the National Surface and River Prediction System (NSRPS). Operating at a resolution of 30 arc seconds, NSRPS currently generates Ensemble Streamflow Predictions (ESPs) for over four million grid points. Issued once per day, the ensemble is composed of twenty members and provides 16-day forecasts. NSRPS differs from other hydrological forecasting systems in operational use in Canada by being continental in scope and by relying on an Earth System Modelling (ESM) approach for prediction. In order to assess the value of forecasts issued by NSRPS, a comparison is performed with a similar ESP system available over all of Canada: the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The evaluation focusses on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence watershed as well as the Nelson and Churchill watersheds, each over one million km² in size. 393 streamflow stations are identified where NSRPS and GloFAS agree on the watershed delineation. The comparison is limited to the Spring, Summer and Fall of 2022 due to NSRPS forecast data availability. For most stations, NSRPS performs better than GloFAS in terms of Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), but the median of the potential CRPS across the 393 stations is very similar for days 3-16. Both systems suffer from a lack of spread, particularly for short lead times, but the problem is slightly more acute for GloFAS. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is explored in order to obtain calibrated probabilistic forecasts that perform better than both NSRPS and GloFAS.
How to cite: Fortin, V., Innocenti, S., Gaborit, É., Durnford, D., Keita, S., Bruxer, J., Boucher, M.-A., Harrigan, S., Zsoter, E., Dimitrijevic, M., Sévigny, C., O'Brien, N., and Gervasi, N.: Evaluation of continental-scale ensemble hydrological forecasts from Environment and Climate Change Canada: a comparison with forecasts from the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS) , EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2950, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2950, 2023.