EGU23-4461
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4461
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Thermochronologic constraints on exhumation associated with the Main Pamir Thrust

Edward Sobel1, Jonas Kley2, Johannes Rembe1, Rasmus Thiede3, Johannes Glodny4, Lennart Grimm1, Maximilian Rometsch1, Asil Newigy1, Nowrad Ali1, Wafaa Altyeb1, and Daniela Espinoza Tapia1
Edward Sobel et al.
  • 1Universität Potsdam, Institut fuer Geowissenschaften, Golm, Germany (edsobel@gmail.com)
  • 2Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Strukturgeologie/Geodynamik, Göttingen, Germany (jonas.kley@geo.uni-goettingen.de)
  • 3Christian Albrecht Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Geowissenschaften, Kiel, Germany (rasmus.thiede@ifg.uni-kiel.de)
  • 4GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany (glodnyj@gfz-potsdam.de)

The Pamir orogen forms the northwest prolongation of the Tibetan plateau. The most important surficial structure bounding the northern and northwestern margin is the Main Pamir Thrust (MPT); however, despite the importance of the structure, surprisingly little is known about the displacement history of the fault. Together with the younger, foreland-oriented Pamir Frontal thrust system (PFT), displacement estimates range from 50 to over 300 km. The larger estimates are based on the estimated Cenozoic northward indentation of the Pamir with respect to Tibet as well as the length of the intracontinental Pamir seismic zone. However, recent work suggests that some of the indentation predates the Cenozoic or is related to an original Paleozoic embayed paleogeography and other studies have suggested that the seismic zone is not related to intracontinental subduction. Shortening estimates in the hanging walls of the MPT and PFT suggest more modest amounts: between 30 and 75 km in the north, with higher values for SE-NW shortening in the Tadjik depression.

Constraining the onset of deformation has proven challenging. Most publications suggest a late Oligo-early Miocene onset age. Cenozoic stratigraphic sequences are unfossiliferous and poorly dated. We have attempted to resolve this question by collecting samples for thermochronologic analysis from many locations along the arcuate margin. In general, zircon (U-Th-Sm)/He (ZHe) samples yield ages between ~60 and 17 Ma. Many are likely to be partially reset. Ages are slightly older in the east, which could reflect an overall westward increase in exhumation. The relatively small amount of exhumation in the north supports our structural interpretation that the MPT there has a low dip angle and might not have produced pronounced topography. Apatite fission track (AFT) and apatite (U-Th-Sm)/He (AHe) are often much younger; often between <15 and 10 Ma in the MPT hanging wall and < 10 Ma in the footwall. These younger ages may reflect the activation of a second pulse of exhumation linked to motion along the PFT. We are modeling these data sets using QTQt to try to better constrain the exhumation history of the fault system. In turn, these should help constrain shortening estimates.

How to cite: Sobel, E., Kley, J., Rembe, J., Thiede, R., Glodny, J., Grimm, L., Rometsch, M., Newigy, A., Ali, N., Altyeb, W., and Espinoza Tapia, D.: Thermochronologic constraints on exhumation associated with the Main Pamir Thrust, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4461, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4461, 2023.