Effectiveness-assessment of nature-based flood mitigation using networked, low cost DIY environmental monitoring from FreeStation

FreeStations are mature low-cost, networked, DIY environmental sensors and data loggers, developed since 2014  and now deployed around the world.  Build instructions are open source at www.freestation.org and based on high availability, low cost but accurate and robust components (with builds typically 3% the parts-cost of an equivalent proprietary monitoring systems).  This allows investment in a network of environmental loggers at the cost of a single, proprietary logger.  

FreeStations have been widely deployed in the DEFRA Natural Flood Management (NFM) national trials in the UK, and analytical methods developed to examine the performance of leaky dams, retention ponds, regenerative agricultural practices and other nature based solutions in mitigating flood risk at downstream assets.

These deployments usually consist of FreeStation weather stations: recording rainfall volume, rainfall intensity, air temperature, humidity and pressure as well as solar radiation, wind speed and direction.  The rainfall volume and instantaneous intensity are the most important for NFM studies.  Alongside weather stations, FreeStation sonar-based stage sensors are used, alongside river profile scan from a FreeStation LIDAR, to monitor change in river discharge due to an NFM intervention, relative to discharge at a downstream asset at risk.  Readings are taken at 10-minute intervals over multiple years.

A series of web based methods have been built as part of the FreeStation //Smart: platform to monitor and manage data from deployments and to analyse data to better understand flood mitigation by the key types of intervention.  In testing at more than 10 sites in the UK over a period of 2-3 years per site, large volumes of data have been collected at low cost and in support of local stakeholders during the H2020NAIAD and H2020ReSET projects.  

The data indicate the importance of careful design in leaky debris dams, the limited impact of inline retention ponds and the significant capacity of low-till farming methods to mitigate downstream flooding.  The effectiveness of NFM depends upon the number and scale of interventions, the proportion of the discharge at the downstream asset at risk which they affect (i.e. the downstream proximity of the asset at risk) and the capital and maintenance costs of the interventions. 

Low-cost approaches to environmental monitoring will be critical for developing the evidence base needed to better understand what nature based solutions work, where for water.  Low cost, internet-connected devices are easy to monitor and maintain, low risk and capable of extensive deployment to address the challenge of geographical variability which means that the impacts of specific NFM interventions are highly site specific.