EGU23-6302, updated on 02 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6302
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ShakeMapTM v4 study, analysis of rapid shaking assessment, optimization and evaluation of high-resolution prospects for mainland France and French overseas territories

Léna Pellorce1, Véronique Mendel1, Antoine Schlupp2, and Marc Grunberg1
Léna Pellorce et al.
  • 1Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre, UAR830, Université de Strasbourg/EOST, CNRS, F-67084 Strasbourg cedex, France
  • 2Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg, UMR7063, Université de Strasbourg/EOST, CNRS, F-67084 Strasbourg cedex, France

Shakemaps are important tools for characterizing and visualizing the geographic impact of seismic events. It is also a great support of communication and crisis management, especially in the early stage following an event. It is thus important to constrain at best the parameters controlling the calculation to have the most reliable shakemaps possible. 

Our study consists in optimizing the shakemaps in an application for moderate seismic activity in mainland France and French overseas territories. 

We studied the evolution from v3.5 to v4 of USGS ShakeMapTM and compared the associated shakemaps for past events. An in-depth study of the core calculations of the v4 was necessary to take advantage of their new approaches and optimize the parameters and configuration for the French territories. 

Our goal was not only to implement the ShakeMap v4 as the new automatic functional version on www.franceseisme.fr, the BCSF-Rénass website (Résif-Epos), but also to evaluate the prospects and limitations for computing high-resolution shakemaps. We analyzed the uncertainties of shakemaps between rapid shaking assessment based on preliminary data and the late reference shakemap based on complete validated datasets for recent damaging or largely felt events in France.

What can we improve today to reach high-resolution? What might be possible in a few years? Finally, what are the limits that we may never be able to overcome in the ShakeMapTM  program approach?

How to cite: Pellorce, L., Mendel, V., Schlupp, A., and Grunberg, M.: ShakeMapTM v4 study, analysis of rapid shaking assessment, optimization and evaluation of high-resolution prospects for mainland France and French overseas territories, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6302, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6302, 2023.