EGU23-7623
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7623
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Did Earth surface processes promote stabilization of the central Indian Bundelkhand craton?

Cody Colleps1, N. Ryan McKenzie2, Wei Chen3, and Mukund Sharma4
Cody Colleps et al.
  • 1Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany (colleps@uni-potsdam.de)
  • 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Faculty of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
  • 4Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow, India

The impact that ancient Earth surface processes had on long-term thermal regimes remain uncertain despite their potentially important role in fostering craton stabilization and preservation. The distribution and redistribution of heat producing elements (HPEs) during craton development plays a major role in lithospheric cooling and strengthening. Whereas the redistribution of HPEs via erosion has theoretically been suggested to alter the long-term geotherm and contribute to Moho cooling, direct temporal constraints from the field are lacking to adequately assess the role that ancient Earth surface processes may have had on long-term thermal regimes. Here, we used apatite U-Pb thermochronology to assess the thermal evolution of the Archean Bundelkhand craton of central India immediately following its amalgamation and final phase of silicic magmatism at ~2.5 Ga. Apatite from both ~3.4 Ga granitic gneisses and ~2.5 Ga granitoids collected across the ~250 km-wide craton yielded near-uniform apatite U-Pb dates between ~2.4–2.3 Ga, indicating that the craton was broadly exhumed through mid-crustal depths shortly following shallow granitoid emplacement. Unroofing of the craton at this time is further corroborated by the presence of a distinct ~2.5 Ga detrital zircon U-Pb age peak obtained from ~2.2–2.3 Ga sandstones in direct non-conformable contact with Bundelkhand granitoids. We speculate that a two-step redistribution of HPEs largely contributed to the stabilization of the Bundelkhand craton. First, the concentration of HPEs within shallowly emplaced granitoids at ~2.5 Ga reduced the heat production of the lower-most crust. Second, post-emplacement exhumation of HPE-enriched Bundelkhand granitoids further modified the heat source distribution to a thermal regime that promoted cooling of the lower-crust. Although the mechanism driving exhumation through mid-crustal depths remains uncertain, temporal relationships from the Bundelkhand craton suggest that erosional processes may have had a significant role in promoting the craton’s stability and longevity.

How to cite: Colleps, C., McKenzie, N. R., Chen, W., and Sharma, M.: Did Earth surface processes promote stabilization of the central Indian Bundelkhand craton?, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-7623, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7623, 2023.