EGU23-8767
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8767
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Can Normalizing Flows make Uncertainty Quantification Practical for Time-Lapse Seismic Monitoring

Changxiao Sun1,2,3, Alison Malcolm2, and Rajiv Kumar4
Changxiao Sun et al.
  • 1Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China (sunchangxiao@apm.ac.cn)
  • 2Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada (amalcolm@mun.ca)
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4Schlumberger (rajmittal09@gmail.com)

Due to the nonlinearity of inversion as well as the noise in the data, seismic inversion results certainly have uncertainties. Whether quantifying these uncertainties is useful depends at least in part on the computational cost of computing them.  Bayesian techniques dominate uncertainty quantification for seismic inversion.  The goal of these methods is to estimate the probability distribution of the model parameters given the observed data. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm is widely employed for approximating the posterior distribution. However, generating the posterior samples by combining the prior and the likelihood is intractable for large problems and challenging for smaller problems. We apply a machine learning method called normalizing flows, which consists of a series of invertible and differentiable transformations, as an alternative to the sampling-based methods. In our work, the normalizing flows method is combined with full waveform inversion(FWI) using a numerically exact local solver to quantify the uncertainty of time-lapse changes. We integrate uncertainty quantification(UQ) and FWI by estimating UQ on the images generated by FWI making it computationally practical. In this way, a reasonable posterior probability distribution is directly predicted and produced by transforming from a normal distribution, measuring the amount and spread of variation in FWI images by sample mean and standard deviation. In our numerical results, the method for calculating the posterior distribution of the model is verified to be practical and advantageous in terms of effectiveness.

How to cite: Sun, C., Malcolm, A., and Kumar, R.: Can Normalizing Flows make Uncertainty Quantification Practical for Time-Lapse Seismic Monitoring, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-8767, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8767, 2023.