Retrieving the rainfall signature from the isotope composition of speleothem fluid inclusion water: progress and pitfalls

Over recent years, a growing number of case studies have highlighted the relevance of fluid inclusion (FI) isotope analysis on speleothem calcite for the reconstruction of rainfall isotope variation back in time. Multiple studies documented FI isotope results consistent with projected local meteoric water line values, demonstrating that FI isotope analysis can provide unique and quantitative paleohydrological data. Several other studies have shown that FI isotope data can be compromised due to diagenetic effects, or (petrography-controlled) analytical artefacts. Such diagenetic or analytical artefacts typically have a detrimental impact on the accuracy of isotope equilibrium-based cave temperatures calculated from paired oxygen isotope values of FI water and host calcite.

Here, we will highlight some recent FI isotope records, discuss current views on the recognition of FI isotopic artefacts, and provide guidelines for the interpretation of FI isotope data as a paleo-rainfall proxy, with particular focus on direct comparison to novel TEX₈₆ paleotemperatures that can be derived from the same speleothem calcite.