EGU23-9624, updated on 24 Apr 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9624
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Air pollution health inequalities in a low-carbon future

Carly Reddington1, Steven Turnock2, Luke Conibear3, Stephen Arnold1, Lea Berrang Ford4, Charlotte Weaver4, Piers Forster4, and Jason Lowe2
Carly Reddington et al.
  • 1University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (c.l.s.reddington@leeds.ac.uk)
  • 2Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
  • 3The Tomorrow Companies Inc., Boston, MA, US
  • 4Priestley Centre for Climate Change, University of Leeds, UK

Understanding the health co-benefits of climate change mitigation and how they manifest across different socioeconomic groups is crucial to justify and prioritise future decarbonisation pathways to achieve net zero. In this work, we quantify future worldwide air quality and public health co-benefits of decarbonisation to limit end-of-century warming to either 2ºC (scenario SSP1-2.6) or 1.5ºC (scenario SSP1-1.9), relative to the middle-of-the-road pathway with a medium long-term radiative forcing target of 4.5 W m-2 (scenario SSP2-4.5). We use simulated ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations for the period 2015-2100 from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) experiments. We estimate the mortality burden attributable to exposure to ambient PM2.5 using population attributable fractions of relative risk, incorporating projected changes in population demographics and per-capita GDP. We find that following a future decarbonisation pathway could produce substantial global reductions in population exposure to PM2.5 pollution and associated premature mortality across all socioeconomic groups, with maximum health benefits achieved for middle-income populations (predominantly in Asia) around mid-century. Overall, the more moderate 2ºC-compliant mitigation scenario (SSP1-2.6) could reduce the global PM2.5-attributable mortality burden by 24% in 2050 relative to SSP2-4.5, averting ~2.5M (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 2.1-2.8M) annual deaths worldwide. The more stringent 1.5ºC scenario (SSP1-1.9) could reduce the PM2.5 mortality burden by 29% in 2050, averting ~2.9M (UI: 2.5-3.4M) annual deaths. The magnitude of the air quality and health benefits of reduced PM2.5 pollution through decarbonisation vary with the socioeconomic status of the exposed population, with greater reductions in the PM2.5 mortality burden in middle- and high-income regions (22%) than in the low-income region (15%). Overall, the disparity in PM2.5 exposure between low- and high-income populations is predicted to reduce by 2100 under all three future scenarios. However, the global PM2.5 exposure disparity is projected to increase up to mid-century under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, thus, immediate reduction in the disparity in the near term, is only achieved under a decarbonisation scenario. Despite overall reductions in global PM2.5 exposure inequalities by the end of the century, the disparity in PM2.5 exposure remains around 30%, with the low- and lower-middle-income populations continuing to experience PM2.5 exposures that are over three times the WHO Air Quality Guideline.

How to cite: Reddington, C., Turnock, S., Conibear, L., Arnold, S., Berrang Ford, L., Weaver, C., Forster, P., and Lowe, J.: Air pollution health inequalities in a low-carbon future, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9624, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9624, 2023.