G1.2 | High-precision GNSS: methods, open problems, and Geoscience applications
EDI
High-precision GNSS: methods, open problems, and Geoscience applications
Convener: Jacek Paziewski | Co-conveners: Elisa Benedetti, Mattia Crespi, Jianghui Geng, Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez
Orals
| Tue, 25 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST)
 
Room -2.91
Posters on site
| Attendance Tue, 25 Apr, 16:15–18:00 (CEST)
 
Hall X2
Orals |
Tue, 10:45
Tue, 16:15
In recent years we have witnessed notable progress in signals, services, and satellite deployment of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Modernizing operational GNSS systems and developing new constellations have moved us towards a new stage of multi-constellation and multi-frequency observations. Meanwhile, the technology development provided high-grade GNSS equipment to collect measurements at much higher rates, up to 100 Hz, of lower noise and multipath impact. Moreover, the recent progress in low-cost GNSS chipsets catalyzes an expansion of traditional satellite navigation to novel areas of science and industry. Therefore, on one side, the developments in GNSS stimulate a broad range of new applications for solid and fluid Earth investigations, both in post-processing and in real-time. On the other side, such progress results in further problems and challenges in data processing, which boosts GNSS research. Algorithmic advancements are needed to address the opportunities and challenges in enhancing the accuracy, availability, interoperability, and integrity of high-precision GNSS applications.
This session is a forum to discuss advances in high-precision GNSS algorithms and their applications to Geosciences. Contributions from other branches of Geoscience, such as geodynamics, seismology, tsunamis, ionosphere, troposphere, etc., are also welcome.
We encourage but do not limit submissions related to:
- Processing algorithms in high-precision GNSS,
- Multi-GNSS benefits for Geosciences,
- Multi-constellation GNSS processing and product standards,
- High-rate GNSS,
- Low-cost receiver and smartphone GNSS observations for precise positioning, navigation, and geoscience applications,
- Precise Point Positioning (PPP, PPP-RTK) and Real Time Kinematic (RTK),
- GNSS and other sensors (accelerometers, INS, etc.) fusion,
- GNSS products for high-precision applications (orbits, clocks, uncalibrated phase delays, inter-system and inter-frequency biases, etc.),
- Troposphere and ionosphere modeling with GNSS,
- CORS services for Geosciences (GBAS, Network-RTK, etc.),
- Precise Positioning of EOS platforms,
- Precise Positioning for natural hazards prevention,
- Monitoring crustal deformation and the seismic cycle of active faults,
- GNSS and early-warning systems,
- GNSS reflectometry.

Orals: Tue, 25 Apr | Room -2.91

Chairpersons: Jianghui Geng, Jacek Paziewski, Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez
10:45–10:50
10:50–11:00
|
EGU23-17041
|
solicited
|
Highlight
|
Virtual presentation
Yuanxi Yang, Xia Ren, Tianhe Xu, and Bijiao Sun

BeiDou Global Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) was formally commissioned to provide satellite navigation services worldwide in 2020. It not only has the normal positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) functions, but also provides several kinds of featured services. The paper  focuses on the featured services of BDS-3 and their applications in various geoscience fields. First, the featured services of BDS-3 and their performances are introduced. Then different application examples are described and analyzed based on the Geostationary Orbit (GEO) satellite-based featured services and Middle Earth Orbit (MEO) satellite-based featured services. Finally, some possible improvements to BDS in the future are discussed.

How to cite: Yang, Y., Ren, X., Xu, T., and Sun, B.: Featured Services of BDS-3 with Applications in Geoscience, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-17041, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-17041, 2023.

11:00–11:10
|
EGU23-6769
|
On-site presentation
|
Peter Steigenberger, Steffen Thoelert, Rolf Dach, and Oliver Montenbruck

GPS III is the latest generation of modernized satellites of the Global Positioning System. Five GPS III satellites have already been launched between December 2018 and June 2021 and three further GPS III spacecraft are available for launch. Starting in 2019, satellite antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) for the L1, L2, and L5 frequency bands have been published by the manufacturer Lockheed Martin for the individual spacecraft launched so far. These PCOs are included in the igs20.atx antenna phase center model of the International GNSS Service (IGS). They are complemented by nadir-dependent phase center variations (PCVs) estimated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) and the European Space Operations Center (ESOC). In Fall 2022, manufacturer-calibrated nadir- and azimuth-dependent directivity and phase patterns were, furthermore made available, which provide a more complete description of the antenna characteristics.

This contribution aims at a validation of these satellite antenna metadata. As a reference, satellite antenna PCOs and PCVs are estimated from L1/L2 and L1/L5 ionosphere-free linear combinations of a global network of GNSS tracking stations. These are compared to the ground calibrations of the GPS III transmit antennas obtained in an anechoic chamber. The manufacturer-provided directivity patterns for the main lobe of the GPS III transmit antennas can be validated with observations of a directional high-gain antenna. The 30 m dish antenna of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) located in Weilheim, Germany, was used to obtain equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) measurements of all GPS III spacecraft. Repeated measurements are used to evaluate the measurement precision and elevation-dependent RMS differences allow for an assessment of the consistency of the EIRP measurements and the pre-flight gain calibrations.

How to cite: Steigenberger, P., Thoelert, S., Dach, R., and Montenbruck, O.: Validation of GPS III antenna patterns, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6769, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6769, 2023.

11:10–11:20
|
EGU23-3580
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Bobin Cui, Jungang Wang, Xinyuan Jiang, Pan Li, Maorong Ge, and Harald Schuh

Due to the correlation between coordinates, atmospheric delays, and ambiguities, Precise Point Position with Ambiguity Resolution (PPP-AR) needs a long convergence time (around 20 min) to achieve cm-level accuracy. With the help of precise external atmospheric products, PPP-AR convergence time can be reduced to a few minutes or even instantaneously. However, a stable and continuous data transmission in real-time communication could be challenging in more expansive areas due to the massive amount of correction information from dense networks. In addition, data interruptions and switching reference stations also could cause discontinuity or anomalies in the real-time correction information. By combining both wide-area fitting functions and regional un-modeled corrections, we present an integrated hierarchical augmentation method, which could ensure reliable and precise positioning with less communication burden. The first level of the hierarchical model includes the satellite-wise slant ionospheric delay and tropospheric Zenith Wet Delay (ZWD) wide-area fitting models, which provides an essential correction with few model coefficients covering a larger area. Moreover, the residual unmodeled errors and phase residuals can be provided optionally, according to the communication capability and the user’s requirement. The newly developed augmentation mode extends from the current wide-area low-precision to the hierarchical-precision service, which relieves the communication burden and greatly reduces the dependence on the distribution of reference stations. We evaluate our model in the European region, using 103 EUREF Permanent Network (EPN) stations with 200 km station-spacing as modeling stations and 84 stations as external validation. The precision of the wide-area ionospheric and tropospheric delay models are 4.5 cm and 1.3 cm, respectively. With only the wide-area correction information, an convergence time (to 10 cm) of 2 and 3 minutes can be achieved for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. Based on the magnitude of wide-area unmodeled errors, the optional unmodeled correction broadcast volume can be saved by 40-50% with respect to the legacy interpolation mode. Moreover, instantaneous ambiguity fixing within one to two epochs (1 min) can be achieved if the unmodeled residuals are exploited. Therefore, the proposed hierarchical augmentation mode satisfies different positioning demands of wide-area with low resource utilization.

How to cite: Cui, B., Wang, J., Jiang, X., Li, P., Ge, M., and Schuh, H.: An integrated hierarchical wide-area augmentation for real-time GNSS positioning, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-3580, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3580, 2023.

11:20–11:30
|
EGU23-11735
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Marcus Franz Glaner and Robert Weber

Over the past decades, Precise Point Positioning (PPP) has become a well-established technique for determining the user's position with the signals of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). PPP is characterized by applying precise satellite products (orbits, clocks, and biases) and accurately modeling a wide range of error sources to estimate the user's position. This way, a position accuracy at the centimeter or even millimeter level is accomplished. However, the convergence time until the coordinates have reached this accuracy is well known as the primary concern of PPP. In that regard, PPP with integer ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) has proven as an effective way to dramatically reduce the convergence time of PPP, especially in the east coordinate component.

Currently, the so-called Orbit Exchange (ORBEX) format is under revision. Its main philosophy is larger flexibility for the description of the satellite state than in different existing formats. Besides other advantages, the ORBEX format can provide information on the satellite orientation in attitude records. Several Analysis Centers have started to provide such data in addition to their satellite orbits, clocks, and biases. Consequently, the PPP user can accurately calculate the satellite orientation instead of relying on the usually adopted IGS convention.

Since the satellites' orientation is essential for accurately modeling several error sources and recovering the integer property of the phase ambiguities, the performance of PPP is usually improved by using accurate satellite attitude information. This contribution illustrates the effect of attitude data on ambiguity fixing, convergence time (time to first fix), and coordinate accuracy in several test cases. Especially, satellite eclipse seasons are investigated. The PPP calculations are performed with our software raPPPid, the PPP module of the Vienna VLBI and Satellite Software (VieVS PPP).

How to cite: Glaner, M. F. and Weber, R.: Enhancing PPP-AR with satellite attitude data from ORBEX files, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-11735, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11735, 2023.

11:30–11:40
|
EGU23-15254
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
Edgar Lenhof, Jean-Yves Royer, Valérie Ballu, Pierre Sakic, Charles Poitou, Mickael Beauverger, Thibault Coulombier, Denis Dausse, Gregor Jamieson, Pierre-Yves Morvan, and Marc-André Gutscher

GNSS/A is a proven method to localize seafloor geodetic stations and, thus, to monitor seafloor tectonic phenomena. This approach combines GNSS positioning of a surface platform with acoustic ranging between this platform and acoustic beacons on the sea bottom, with the objective to localize the beacons in a global frame within a centimeter or so. As part of the FOCUS project, a network of seafloor stations was deployed offshore Sicily in Italy, at about 1900 meters depth. It was surveyed from a small autonomous surface vehicle (ASV) equipped with two GNSS receivers. Here we present the post-processing applied to the GNSS surface navigation data in order to reduce the uncertainty budget of the GNSS/A algorithm. We found significant discrepancies between GNSS receivers in terms of signal degrading effects (multipaths, cycle slips, signal interruptions). We also found that GNSS antennas are less subject to these effects when mounted on an ASV rather than on the main vessel mast. The correlation found between solution accuracy and signal degrading effects potency turned out to be inadequate to predict the former knowing the latter. Then, we compared the accuracy of kinematic solutions from three GNSS PPP-AR post-processing packages to a few/several centimeters level. From our analysis, we find that the best accuracy was reached using the CSRS-PPP service.

How to cite: Lenhof, E., Royer, J.-Y., Ballu, V., Sakic, P., Poitou, C., Beauverger, M., Coulombier, T., Dausse, D., Jamieson, G., Morvan, P.-Y., and Gutscher, M.-A.: Comparison of GNSS PPP-AR packages for post-processing seafloor geodetic data., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-15254, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15254, 2023.

11:40–11:50
|
EGU23-10853
|
Virtual presentation
|
D. Ugur Sanli, Deniz Cetin, and S Sermet Ogutcu

Determining the accuracy of position and velocity using GNSS is now on the agenda of the research community. Each unique system in the GNSS puts effort to complete its constellation of satellites, with orbits and clocks of ever-increasing quality. In order to interpret the quality of the results, we started the IGS MGEX experiment, where we, as end users, used the network and its data for evaluation. Various software has been developed to evaluate Multi-GNSS products, and researchers evaluate the results of both independent and combined systems within the framework of their experiments and have the opportunity to compare the software with each other. Succeeding JPL's 2019 experiment, we focused on the evaluation of the GIPSY-X, a multi-GNSS software, positioning results and we would like to share our initial findings with you. Unlike other studies, our focus is on the factors influencing position determination and their mathematical modeling. There is also an emphasis in our study on the campaign Multi-GNSS. In the first part of the study, we made inferences about GPS+GLONASS positioning accuracy. We modeled and compared the results of CSRS-PPP and GIPSY-X with each other. In the second part, we examined the GALILEO contribution to the GIPSY-X positioning solutions, and again we present modeling. We still see the effect of the observation session on positioning on all results and modeled it for GPS+GLONASS+GALILEO. We could not see the "geographical latitude dependence" on positioning that we noticed in the GPS-only studies in these first trials. In this presentation, we will try to examine the possible reasons for this.

How to cite: Sanli, D. U., Cetin, D., and Ogutcu, S. S.: Multi-GNSS trials: a note on software comparison and campaign GNSS measurements, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10853, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10853, 2023.

11:50–12:00
|
EGU23-9866
|
On-site presentation
Maximilian Semmling, Jens Berdermann, Hiroatsu Sato, Friederike Fohlmeister, Martin Kriegel, and Mainul Hoque

A GNSS data set was recorded for ionosphere sounding on the German research icebreaker Polarstern during the expedition of MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate). The GNSS setup comprised a multi-GNSS high-rate (50 Hz) receiver and a multiband GNSS antenna at right-handed polarization. During the one-year expedition (Sep. 2019 to Oct. 2020) the ship drifted with ice floes over the Arctic Ocean for studying the Arctic climate. In addition, the drift gave an excellent opportunity to collect GNSS data for ionosphere sounding over the central Arctic (at lat. > 85° N). More than five months the ship was drifting in the central part of the Arctic where data from permanent GNSS stations are not available. Nearest stations are all located further south. These measurements aboard Polarstern provide ideal conditions to study scintillations induced by disturbances in the Arctic ionosphere (e.g. by polar patches). The coincidence of the expedition period (2019/20) and solar minimum is a small drawback for the study. It limits the probability of strong scintillations in the observations. So, the question arises whether the precision of GNSS phase measurements on a ship is high enough to detect phase scintillations at solar minimum.

The standard deviation of detrended phase samples (phase scintillation index) is derived with 30 s resolution for each GNSS link to quantify disturbance. The study focuses in a first approach on GPS data and high elevation angles (> 30°) as these rays propagate rather vertically and stay in the central Arctic with ionospheric piercing points (assumed at 350 km) not far from the ship location (roughly: horizontal distance < 600 km). Three categories of disturbance are identified in this elevation range:

  • Phase index baseline of about 0.1 +/- 0.05 rad, that is the lower limit for this ship-based setup
  • Phase index anomalies from 0.15 to 0.4 rad (and more) that are found in constant directions on the ship (constant relative bearing) and can be attributed to disturbance of ship multipath/shadowing (by mast and chimney) affecting the field-of-view in these directions
  • Phase index anomalies between 0.15 and 0.2 rad, that occur around local noon at the given high latitudes and can be identified as weak scintillations due to ionospheric disturbance in the cusp region (at the convergence of geomagnetic field lines)

Compared to a typical ground-based station operating in the Arctic, the ship-based measurements present a rather high baseline index level that is already in the weak scintillation range. The difference between baseline and the cusp-related scintillations is rather small. Parameters (latitude, elevation angle and local time of the observation) are considered to identify the ionospheric scintillations. Furthermore, anomalies induced by ship multipath disturb the scintillation detection and need to be identified and masked out based on relative bearing limits. We conclude that ship-based GNSS is precise enough to detect Arctic phase scintillations even at the minimum of the solar cycle if proper analysis is conducted.

How to cite: Semmling, M., Berdermann, J., Sato, H., Fohlmeister, F., Kriegel, M., and Hoque, M.: Are ship-based GNSS measurements precise enough to detect ionospheric phase scintillation at solar minimum?, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9866, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9866, 2023.

12:00–12:10
|
EGU23-9450
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Grzegorz Nykiel, Juan Andrés Cahuasquí, Mainul Hoque, and Norbert Jakowski

Ionospheric disturbances can negatively impact the accuracy, continuity, availability, and integrity of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) based services. Therefore, reliable description and characterization of these disturbances are essential to guarantee an adequate level of safety for GNSS-based systems, susceptible to strong spatial gradients and rapid changes in electron density along the receiver-satellite path (slant total electron content, STEC).

This study aims to compare various indices that describe the current condition and intensity of ionospheric disturbances using GNSS observations from approximately 350 reference stations in Europe. The indices studied include the Gradient Ionospheric Index (GIX), the Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance Index (SIDX), and the Rate Of Tec Index (ROTI). The study focuses on selected geomagnetic storms and compares the results for different latitude zones (30-45°N, 45-60°N, and 60-75°N). The results show that the behaviors of the investigated indices differ in each case and are strongly dependent on the ionospheric storm propagation mechanism and associated with actual space weather and geo-physical conditions. The study also examines the relationships between the analyzed indices and GNSS positioning results using absolute and differential approaches and code pseudorange and carrier phase-based results. In addition, a comparison with vertical protection error (VPE) and vertical protection level (VPL) for selected EGNOS Ranging and Integrity Monitoring Stations is included.

How to cite: Nykiel, G., Cahuasquí, J. A., Hoque, M., and Jakowski, N.: Comparison of GIX, SIDX and ROTI ionospheric indices and their relationships with GNSS positioning results, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9450, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9450, 2023.

12:10–12:20
|
EGU23-3364
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Rui Wang, Thomas Hobiger, Grzegorz Marut, and Tomasz Hadas

In GNSS analysis, tropospheric modelling is done in the form of Zenith Hydrostatic Delay (ZHD), which can be empirically computed from surface pressure and temperature, and Zenith Wet Delay (ZWD), which is estimated together with the other unknown parameters.  Analysis methods based on undifferenced GNSS code- and carrier-phase observations like Precise Point Positioning (PPP), which can achieve millimeter-accurate positioning results, provide therefore also time-series of ZWD, which can be used for meteorologic applications. However, due to receiver noise and system characteristics like cycle-slips the accuracy as well as the precision of such ZWD estimates is limited. Thus, we propose a novel approach for sites, which have several receivers connected to a single antenna or which are separated horizontally by only a few meters. For such sites, one can simultaneously process multi-frequency GNSS data by fusing observations from several receivers, while estimating a common ZWD parameter.

For this purpose, we have implemented a PPP algorithm based on an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) approach, which has the advantage that ZWD estimates are available in real-time for meteorologic applications. We demonstrate that those combined ZWD estimates are superior to single receiver estimates in term of precision and accuracy. For the latter measure, we make use of a GNSS hardware simulator and show that the RMS between the simulated and estimated ZWD significantly decreases when having two or more receivers at that site. Based on real-data we show that this concept provides less noisy ZWD estimates which agree better with physical properties of the local wet refractivity field.

Moreover, we demonstrate that fusing data from several receivers by estimating a common ZWD parameter improves also positioning accuracy and precision, in particular in the up-component. In order to properly combine observations from geodetic-grade and low-cost GNSS receivers, we present our adaptive Kalman filter approach, which adjusts the observation noise covariance matrix automatically during processing. The presentation concludes with an outlook on the usage of this approach for larger networks and answers the question how arrays of low-cost GNSS receivers can compete against geodetic-grade GNSS hardware in term of providing ZWD estimates for meteorology.

How to cite: Wang, R., Hobiger, T., Marut, G., and Hadas, T.: Improving GNSS meteorology by fusing measurements of multi-receiver sites on the observation level, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-3364, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3364, 2023.

12:20–12:30
|
EGU23-11547
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
Iwona Kudłacik, Jan Kapłon, Marco Fortunato, Kamil Kaźmierski, and Mattia Crespi

The high-rate GNSS has been proven to be an effective tool to describe moderate and strong natural earthquakes, whereas the much less addressed application is monitoring anthropogenic earthquakes, such as mining tremors, where the noise and displacements have similar values. Although the anthropogenic events have small magnitudes (usually below 4.5), they also have much shallower epicentres (depths up to 1-2 km). Therefore, the vibrations they cause are often felt and may have a dangerous impact on the ground, structures and infrastructure nearby.

Here we show that with the high-rate multi-constellation GNSS observations (GPS+Galileo), we can reliably detect the low-magnitude shallow anthropogenic earthquakes and characterise them in terms of displacements and velocities. Our filtering procedure is based on multiresolution analysis and successfully retrieves the small signal of ground vibrations. We analysed five mining tremors with magnitudes of 3.4-4.0 and presented the results from high-rate GNSS position changes calculated parallel with the PPP and variometric approach. The accuracy was very few millimetres for displacements and 1-2 cm/s for velocities. We obtained satisfying correlations with seismological data in correlation, peak values comparison and earthquake first epoch determination. Finally, considering the high-rate GNSS positioning noise level, we demonstrate the capacity to resolve the dynamic displacements from high-rate GNSS at the epicentral distance of about 7-8 km.

How to cite: Kudłacik, I., Kapłon, J., Fortunato, M., Kaźmierski, K., and Crespi, M.: GNSS-seismology for anthropogenic earthquakes, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-11547, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11547, 2023.

Posters on site: Tue, 25 Apr, 16:15–18:00 | Hall X2

Chairpersons: Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez, Jianghui Geng, Jacek Paziewski
X2.79
|
EGU23-2162
Jianghui Geng, Jihang Lin, Jing Zeng, Wenyi Li, and Qiyuan Zhang

The modernized GNSS transmit more signals on various frequencies to suit different application scenarios. However, for a long time, ambiguity resolution has been available to PPP users only on a few signal frequencies specified by the PPP service provider, which prevents other signal frequencies from being used for high-precision positioning applications. Recently, the GNSS Research Center of Wuhan University offered a new version of open-source PRIDE PPP-AR software and a set of “all-frequency” PPP-AR products, that supports PPP users in achieving undifferenced ambiguity resolution on any dual-frequency ionosphere-free combination based on the same satellite phase clocks. The new feature of PRIDE PPP-AR was tested with GPS/Galileo/BDS observations from 200 multi-frequency IGS stations in the first 9 months of 2022. The mean wide-/narrow-lane ambiguity fixing rates can achieve 90% on most of the common dual-frequency combinations, including GPS L1/L2, the combination of Galileo E1 and Galileo E5a/E5/E5b/E6, and BDS-3 B1C/B2a and B1I/B2I. On the other common dual-frequency combinations except for the BDS-2 B1I/B2I, the mean wide-/narrow-lane ambiguity fixing rates can achieve 80%. On all the above dual-frequency combinations, the positioning RMS errors compared with the IGS weekly solutions are about 2 mm in the east and the north directions, and below 7 mm in the high direction. Additionally, the new version of PRIDE PPP-AR enables precise orbit determination for LEO satellites. The TurboEdit algorithm was improved with forward and backward moving window averaging (FBMWA) method to accommodate the need for achieving ambiguity resolution on fast motion objects. A comparison between the computed orbits and JPL’s precise orbits for GRACE-FO in 2019 shows that the 3D RMS difference is within 1.7 cm. The PRIDE PPP-AR was first released in 2019 and dedicated to expanding the scope of PPP-AR in geodetic researches. After several updates, this GNSS analysis tool now supports multi-day continuous processing, processing of very-high-rate GNSS data, and quasi-real-time processing with real-time archived PPP products. With the new features of all-frequency PPP-AR and PPP-AR on LEO satellites, the new version of PRIDE PPP-AR will be able to take full advantage of GNSS modernization to improve high-precision positioning accuracy in more research areas.

How to cite: Geng, J., Lin, J., Zeng, J., Li, W., and Zhang, Q.: PRIDE PPP-AR: an open-source scientific software with all-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution for geodesy, geophysics and photogrammetry applications, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2162, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2162, 2023.

X2.80
|
EGU23-5308
Sylvain Loyer, Adrien Mezerette, Eléonore Saquet, Adrian Baños-Garcia, Alvaro Santamaria Gomez, Flavien Mercier, and Felix Perosanz

We present in this contribution the main aspects of efforts done at the CNES/CLS Analysis Center in 2022-2023. We recall the main changes associated with the adoption of the IG20/IGS20.atx standards relying on the recently released International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2020) and following our participation to the third IGS reprocessing campaign (REPRO3).  We also increased our participation to IGS with the delivering of rapid and ultra-rapid products: the quality and specificities of these products (orbit, clocks and erp) are presented together with their availability and some details on the associated processing chain. Finally, we focus on the preliminary results of the processing of the satellites of the Beidou constellation that will be included soon in our products.

How to cite: Loyer, S., Mezerette, A., Saquet, E., Baños-Garcia, A., Santamaria Gomez, A., Mercier, F., and Perosanz, F.: CNES/CLS IGS Analysis Center 2022/2023 Activities, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5308, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5308, 2023.

X2.81
|
EGU23-8828
Lucia Seoane, Théo Gravalon, Guillaume Ramillien, and José Darrozes
While sea level variations at coastal sites can be derived from Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) measurements in GNSS-R, the presence of noise, signal interruptions and unmodelled geophysical contributions still corrupt the quality of the estimates. We propose improvements in the treatment of raw SNR records for obtaining much precise sea level. We implement correction of the atmospheric delays, as well as filtering of loading displacements for producing sea level time series over several years. We also propose empirical corrections on a priori fitting parameters to absorb systematic effects from satellite elevation that spoil the sea level time series. Water height adjustment from periodogram of the windowed SNR signal requires parameters that have been fixed so far, e.g. the width of the analyzing window - or equivalently the number of SNR periods used in the adjustment. In particular, tuning of this latter critical parameter is made versus the receiving antenna height.

How to cite: Seoane, L., Gravalon, T., Ramillien, G., and Darrozes, J.: Methodological improvements for deriving long-term time series of coastal sea level by GNSS-R, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-8828, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8828, 2023.

X2.82
|
EGU23-2453
|
Giordano Teza, Arianna Pesci, and Marco Meschis

A MATLAB toolbox, also compatible with GNU Octave, was developed in order to allow a user not necessarily expert in programming to calculate the strain rate field of an area by means of a procedure with a high level of automation starting from coordinate time series. The results can be used to investigate the crustal tectonic deformations of the studied area. These steps are implemented:

  • time series download from a data repository, e.g. the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL), or another similar database (the download function can be easily edited to allow the use of input time series having different format);
  • calculation of the station velocities by means of the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method, including modeling of offsets, outliers, noise and periodic components. The MLE modeling is carried out by using the external package Hector (Bos et al., 2013. J. Geod., 87, 351-360), automatically called by means of a specifically developed MATLAB function;
  • estimation of Common Mode Error and, if necessary, its removal from time series of some stations and recalculation of the corresponding velocities.
  • calculation of the strain rate field on a regular grid with the modified least squares method, in which a scale factor can be introduced to define the locality of the deformation analysis. Besides the strain rate field, the toolbox provides the corresponding uncertainty estimation and geometric evaluation of the significance of the results;
  • visualization of the results for their interpretation for scientific purposes, including the map of principal strain and the contour plots of change in area (or dilatation), engineering shear normalized to the change in area, second invariant of the strain, prevailing eigenvalue, corresponding uncertainties and geometric significance.

The toolbox, which is available free of charge to any interested user, is characterized by considerable flexibility, and can be easily adapted to different data sources.

The toolbox was recently used in order to refine the rates of active crustal deformation in the upper plate of subduction zones in the specific case of the E-dipping West Crati fault (Calabria) and to evaluate the convergence rate in the Main Thrust Fault (also called Sicilian Basal Thrust) north to Hyblean Plateau (South-Eastern Sicily). 

How to cite: Teza, G., Pesci, A., and Meschis, M.: A MATLAB/GNU Octave toolbox for computation of velocity and strain rate field from GNSS coordinate time series, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2453, 2023.

X2.83
|
EGU23-9248
|
ECS
|
Claudia Quinteros-Cartaya, Jonas Köhler, Johannes Faber, Wei Li, and Nishtha Srivastava

Fast magnitude estimation of large earthquakes has been a key task for warning systems. In the last decades, Global Navigation Satellite Systems data with high-rate sampling (≥1 Hz; HR-GNSS) have provided us with useful information from displacement time series for analyzing large earthquakes; especially when the signals of earthquakes recorded in inertial sensors are saturated. Hence, improving algorithms to contribute to the fast analyses of the HR-GNSS data has been a recent challenge.

In this work, we propose a deep-learning-based algorithm for earthquake magnitude estimation, which was trained by thousands of synthetic displacement time series corresponding to Mw > 6.5 earthquake signals. We adapted the model to a variable number of stations and lengths of the time series as input. Thus, it is possible to apply the algorithm without any restriction on the number of stations, and the flexibility in the length of the input time series facilitates the inclusion of data not only from local stations but also from regional stations if required. The influence of attributes such as noise, magnitude, number of stations, epicentral distance, and length of input time series on the model performance was evaluated. We aim to generalize this approach to the magnitude estimation of earthquakes from different tectonic regions. The robustness of the model was tested with both synthetic and real earthquake signals.

How to cite: Quinteros-Cartaya, C., Köhler, J., Faber, J., Li, W., and Srivastava, N.: Fast Earthquake Magnitude Estimation using HR-GNSS time series: a Deep Learning approach, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9248, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9248, 2023.

X2.84
|
EGU23-5582
|
ECS
|
Patrick Dumitraschkewitz, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Barbara Suesser-Rechberger, and Felix Öhlinger

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) products are integral to a wide array of scientific and commercial applications such as pecise orbit determination of low Earth orbit satellites, earthquake monitoring, GNSS reflectomrety, tropospheric and ionospheric research, surveying and much more. These products consisting of GNSS orbit, clock, phase biases and more are generated by the analysis centres of the International GNSS Service (IGS) by processing observations from a global network of ground stations to one or more GNSS constellations. The processing consists of a combined station position and GNSS satellite orbit determination through a least squares approach donated as global multi-GNSS processing.

Within global multi-GNSS processing it is assumed that the observation noise is elevation-dependent and any spatial and temporal correlations are disregarded. Within numerous studies it has been shown that this assumption is incorrect while several studies additional pointed out that a sophisticated stochastic modelling has a positiv impact on GNSS processing and resulting products. In past reseach we have shown to exploit the post-fit residuals to derive temporal correlations for a sophisticated stochastic modeling. However, there have not been any large-scale investigations regarding the impact of stochastic modelling of observation noise on global GNSS processing products. Furthermore, to guarantee the quality of the GNSS products global multi-GNSS processing requires a sophisticated cycle slip detection and repairing algorithm. Cycle slips are discontinuities in the phase observations and if not corrected can lead to degrading quality of GNSS products.   

We present our advancements in global multi-GNSS processing by exploiting post-fit residuals for stochastic modeling and cycle slip detection. We used several years of observations and a selected IGS network of ground stations to generate GNSS products. Based on this data we analysed the impact our newly integrated approaches have on GNSS products such as orbits, clocks, phase biases and station coordinate time series.  

How to cite: Dumitraschkewitz, P., Mayer-Gürr, T., Suesser-Rechberger, B., and Öhlinger, F.: Exploitation of post-fit residuals in global GNSS network processing, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5582, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5582, 2023.

X2.85
|
EGU23-5850
|
ECS
Marek Halaj and Michal Kacmarik

In recent years, there has been a significant advancement in the field of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). The completion of newly built systems (Galileo, BeiDou) together with the modernisation of long-standing systems (GPS, GLONASS) has brought new signals and also new services to users. A significant technological advance has also been achieved in the development and availability of low-cost devices enabling positioning and navigation based on GNSS alone or a combination of several technologies. The study focuses on testing GNSS receivers in smartphones and low-cost devices combining GNSS and inertial navigation. The aim was to address the current capabilities and the quality of positioning offered by these devices. The analyses were performed on test measurements performed in kinematic mode in an urban environment at walking speed. The aim was to make test measurements that are representative enough to reflect conditions commonly encountered in life. Advanced GNSS techniques were tested in both real-time and post-processing of the raw observations. Low-cost u-blox single and multi-frequency modules combining GNSS and inertial localization, as well as standard Samsung mobile phones were used. Impact of the GNSS (multi-)constellation on the quality of positioning was also evaluated, as some GNSS signals exhibit higher multipath resistance and a higher number of satellites can significantly help with positioning initialization and improve its accuracy.

How to cite: Halaj, M. and Kacmarik, M.: Performance of Low-cost GNSS/INS Receivers and Smartphone GNSS Positioning in Pedestrian Applications, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5850, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5850, 2023.

X2.86
|
EGU23-15009
|
ECS
Katarzyna Stępniak, Grzegorz Krzan, and Jacek Paziewski

In this study, we investigate the impact of GNSS antenna calibration models and multi-GNSS observations on the quality of the tropospheric estimates. The accuracy and homogeneity of the Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) time series estimated from ground-based GNSS data strongly depend on the processing strategy. These factors significantly imply the GNSS solution performance; however, their impact on the quality of the derived ZTD series used for climate applications has not been comprehensively investigated.

We analyzed three years of ZTD time series obtained from GNSS data processing and afterward converted integrated water vapor (IWV). Nine different processing strategies distinguished into three groups were employed: the 1st group of solutions was obtained by applying the International GNSS Service (IGS) type mean Phase Center Correction (PCC) models (IGS14); in the 2nd group, PCC models from individual field robot calibration were used; in the 3rd group of solutions, an anechoic chamber calibration was applied. Each group of solutions was processed three times using different GNSS constellations, namely GPS-only, Galileo-only, or combined GPS+Galileo.

The results reveal that the impact of employed GNSS constellations on the accuracy of the ZTD time series is more pronounced than the impact of antenna calibration models. However, the latter factor is also noticeable and thus cannot be neglected. Moreover, validation against climate reanalysis data confirms that all approaches provide high-quality tropospheric delays.

The outcomes also indicate that ZTD estimates obtained with robotic and IGS14 calibrations are closer to that of ERA5 reanalysis than estimates derived when using calibrations in an anechoic chamber. In addition, multi-GNSS-derived tropospheric parameters are more comparable to the benchmark ones from ERA5 than those provided by single-system solutions. The results also depend, among others, on the stations' equipment (receiver and antenna).

 

How to cite: Stępniak, K., Krzan, G., and Paziewski, J.: Impact of individual antenna phase center models and multi-GNSS observations on tropospheric estimates, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-15009, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15009, 2023.

X2.87
|
EGU23-3210
|
ECS
Effects of GRACE AOD1B Product on Estimated Parameters of "GRACE+GNSS" Combination at the Observation Level
(withdrawn)
Minxing Zhao, Xiancai Zou, and Juanxia Pan
X2.88
|
EGU23-7957
|
ECS
Théo Gravalon, Lucia Seoane, Guillaume Ramillien, and José Darrozes

As the Cordouan lighthouse [N45°35'11"; W1°10'24"] is constructed in the Bay of Biscay, GNSS reflectometry-monitored time series of sea level are characterized by important tidal variations for this site. However, these GNSS-R measurements are impacted by submerged sandy banks that appear at low tide and spoil the estimates of pure sea level. We propose the spatialization of the GNSS reflection points to identify the areas with sandy or rocky parts around the lighthouse. For this purpose, the surrounding of the receiving antenna is divided into juxtaposed geographical cells forming a map filled by water heights estimates according to the position of the reflection points. Water heights are determined using the method of periodogram of 1-second Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) data on a sliding elevation window of several degrees. In particular, correction of the atmospheric delay effects enables to reduce the dispersion of the water heights versus low elevations by a factor around 2. High variability (more than one meter) and higher means of water heights estimated over months in the eastern part are very consistent with the presence of the shoals, while long-term means and dispersions in cells of plain ocean are much smaller. These results are highly emphasized by the distinction between low and high tides.

How to cite: Gravalon, T., Seoane, L., Ramillien, G., and Darrozes, J.: Spatialization and analysis of the GNSS-R measurements around of the Cordouan lighthouse, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-7957, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7957, 2023.