GM11.1 | Cultural and social relevance of geodiversity and geoheritage
EDI
Cultural and social relevance of geodiversity and geoheritage
Convener: Lucie Kubalíková | Co-conveners: Paola Coratza, Márton Pál, Lidia SelmiECSECS, Vittoria VandelliECSECS
Orals
| Mon, 24 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST)
 
Room -2.31
Posters on site
| Attendance Mon, 24 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST)
 
Hall X3
Orals |
Mon, 08:30
Mon, 10:45
During the last years, the close links of geodiversity and geoheritage to culture and human society are being widely discussed. These encompass topics such as the relevance of geodiversity within concept of ecosystem services, different scale and expression of geoheritage - cultural heritage links, implementing the geodiversity into the landscape and urban planning, development strategic documents or EIA procedures (including risk assessment), and importance of geodiversity and geoheritage as a resource for geotourism or regional economic development.
Being aware of wide range of topics and growing number of this emergent field within geodiversity/geoheritage studies, we call for contributions, that would include the themes especially related to:
1) geodiversity and geoheritage’s protection and sustainable use, its relevance for landscape planning, strategic documents, including regional development (Geodiversity Action Plans, Care or management plans and similar strategic and planning documents), including the risks to geoheritage and strategies to avoid and resolve the possible threats.
2) geodiversity, geoheritage and tourism (including geoparks, but not limited to them; geotourism as one of the case of special interest tourism and its links to the other and different types of special interest tourism, e.g. ecotourism, cultural tourism, industrial tourism, mining tourism, spa tourism etc.)
3) ecosystem services of geodiversity (with a special focus on cultural abiotic ES) – not quantitative assessment, rather classification and application in different geographical settings
4) exploring the reflections geodiversity - geoheritage - culture - human society: case studies of geodiversity expression in literature or landscape painting (including possible use of such approach to reconstruct the historical development of landscape and assessing landscape changes), geodiversity and geoheritage and their links to religion, their symbolic value, geodiversity and its reflection in toponyms, use of geodiversity in medicine etc.
5) public „face“ of geodiversity and geoheritage – volunteering, public participation, citizen science projects, community involvement, education.

We would like to continue the tradition of so called "indoor picnic" that have been organised during some of the geodiversity and geoheritage sessions. Thus, we encourage the participants of the session GM11.1 to bring some local products (food, drinks...) related to geodiversity, geoheritage or simply to their area of study. Looking forward to meet you at this special occassion!

Orals: Mon, 24 Apr | Room -2.31

Chairpersons: Lidia Selmi, Lucie Kubalíková
08:30–08:35
08:35–08:40
08:40–08:50
|
EGU23-4029
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Paula Naomi Irapta

Geodiversity is generally defined as the natural range of abiotic (geological, geomorphological, pedological, and hydrological) features and processes. Geoheritage, anchored on geodiversity, is one way of recognizing the landscape’s value to humans. Geoheritage valuation includes recognizing scientific, educational, and touristic values of geodiversity elements to determine sites worth studying and preserving. Key texts in geodiversity and geoheritage research primarily recognize ‘ecosystem services’ as the practical benefits that humans get from the abiotic nature and the natural processes associated with their formation and modification. Recognizing these benefits that humans gain from the landscape provides a foundation for geoconservation. Through its ecosystem services, geodiversity is linked to heritage, education, tourism, and conservation which have been the primary lines of geoheritage research in recent years. Despite geodiversity being defined as a value-free term, it remains a subject that is mainly studied in the Earth Sciences and most geodiversity research progress to geoheritage valuation. Presented here are some ways the Geodiversity concept can be extended beyond Physical Sciences. 

Ecosystem services do not fully account for the complex relationship (beneficial and/or detrimental) humans can have with the landscape. Geoeducation programs in active volcano-tectonic areas, as well as sites of past disasters, highlight geohazards which also result from geodiversity. There have been multiple studies that relate geoheritage and geohazards, and there’s still a potential to establish or adopt a framework to formally integrate these fields. Disaster studies have long considered the environment as something that gives humans both “benefits” and “hazards”, with the perceived weights of each factoring in humans’ decisions in risk mitigation (i.e. evacuating, relocating, etc.). These ‘benefits’ can be thought of as geodiversity’s ecosystem services and the ‘hazards’ as geohazards associated with the geodiversity elements in an area (i.e. presence of active faults, volcanoes, unstable slopes, etc.). By adopting this framework, we recognize that geodiversity is not just ‘beneficial’ but could also be ‘hazardous’ to humans, both of these strengthen the importance of geodiversity and acknowledges the complexity of the role that the abiotic landscape play in the lives of humans. Beyond practical benefits represented by ecosystem services, humans also build relationships with geodiversity through place-making. The place attachment of humans to an area is essentially a non-quantifiable, yet equally important, value that humans give to the landscape. Integrating geodiversity with these theoretical frameworks from the social sciences allows a wider and deeper understanding of how geodiversity is valued and how it actively affects human populations. This understanding, in turn, will greatly help encourage bottom-up approaches in conservation and more meaningful integration of geoscience in local education and tourism efforts. 

How to cite: Irapta, P. N.: Geodiversity beyond Geoheritage, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4029, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4029, 2023.

08:50–09:00
|
EGU23-4489
|
GM11.1
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Javier Dóniz-Paéz, Nemesio M. Pérez, Pedro A. Hernández, Esther Beltrán-Yanes, Yurena Pérez, Nestor Padrón, Nayra Delgado, Juan Carlos Reyes, Marco Duarte, Márcia Paim, Assis Correia, Isabel Viera, Vera Alfama, Sonia V. Silva, Carla Martins, José M. Pereira, Manuel Vasconcelos, and Adlisa Delgado

Although volcanoes present a risk to society, they also represent an opportunity for the development and socio-economic sustainability of their territories. Its main benefits are associated with the diversity of resources offered by volcanic landscapes: geothermal energy, agriculture, building materials, tourism, etc. The volcanic nature of the Macaronesia region (Azores, Madeira, Canarias and Cape Verde archipelagos) constitutes an important geoturistic claim as a result of the great beauty and the landscape diversity of the volcanic territories, offering the possibility of experiencing closely the force of nature and the cultural and spiritual wealth of the population that lives in safe conditions thanks to the existence of programs aimed at reducing volcanic risk. The objective of the VOLTURMAC project (MAC2 / 4.6c / 298), funded by the INTERREG VA Spain-Portugal MAC 2014-2020 Territorial Cooperation Program, is to contribute to the strengthening of the conservation, protection, promotion and development of natural and cultural heritage associated with the volcanic phenomenon in Macaronesia through tourism volcano and contribute to the diversification of the tourist offer of the four Macaronesian archipelagos. To achieve the main objective of this project, nine different activities are proposed and grouped around three main axes: (1) analyze, evaluate and identify the potential of volcano-tourism in Macaronesia; (2) create geo-itineraries and touristic geo-routes that value the natural and cultural resources of the volcanic landscapes of Macaronesia by identifying, selecting, mapping and evaluating geosites, geomorphosites and sites of geotourist interest (SGIs) and (3) promoting and strengthening training on natural and cultural resources linked to the volcanic phenomenon in the tourism sector for all tourism actors, but with special relevance for those in the business field and tourist guides. (Volturmac-MAC2/4.6c/298).

How to cite: Dóniz-Paéz, J., Pérez, N. M., Hernández, P. A., Beltrán-Yanes, E., Pérez, Y., Padrón, N., Delgado, N., Reyes, J. C., Duarte, M., Paim, M., Correia, A., Viera, I., Alfama, V., Silva, S. V., Martins, C., Pereira, J. M., Vasconcelos, M., and Delgado, A.: VOLTURMAC project: a bet of INTERREG V Spain-Portugal program for the development of volcano-tourism in the Macaronesia region, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4489, 2023.

09:00–09:10
|
EGU23-5806
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
Highlight
|
Virtual presentation
Florencia Sanchez, Paulo Pereira, Jorge Romero, and Manuel Schilling

Calbuco Volcano (41.3°S, 72,6ºW) is located in the Southern Andes of Chile, in the Los Lagos region. It ranks 3rd in the Chilean volcanic risk ranking (www.sernageomin.cl) having both high hazard due to recent and frequent eruptions and exposure to that hazard of about 300 000 people in the region. Its last eruption (April 22-23, 2015), severely affected the surroundings of the volcano, including the village of Ensenada, evidencing a growing need for volcanic risk reduction. This task can be assisted by raising awareness of volcanic processes and geoheritage, contributing to reduce exposure to hazards, and to risk education and mitigation. In this work, an assessment of the geoheritage potential of the northern flank of the Calbuco Volcano is presented. Literature review, geological mapping, stratigraphy, and petrographic studies of some recent deposits and eruptive products were performed. Volcanic deposits and landforms (e.g., pyroclastic density currents, lahars, tephra falls, and lava flows) is key to reconstructing volcanic eruptions and providing volcanic hazard data. Besides, well-preserved, and easily accessible eruptive sequences can be used to educate communities exposed to volcanic hazard through different outreach and geoeducation techniques which can help volcanic risk mitigation. The identified geosites were numerically assessed, scoring through qualitative and quantitative procedures. The top-five ranked geosites have high scientific value and use potential, allowing the observation of volcanic processes under better accessibility conditions. They may offer scientific, educational, and touristic use if geoconservation strategies are considered in the management of the areas around the volcano. Part of the volcanic edifice remains inside parks, both public (Llanquihue National Reserve) and private (Parque Valle los Ulmos and Parque Volcanes), which gives it greater accessibility and conservation potential. The addition of further geosites to the inventory from other flanks of the volcano is aimed, for a more detailed characterization of the area and the support of geoconservation strategies and volcanic risk reduction. With these studies, more scientific knowledge and awareness of volcanic processes and hazards can be achieved, mainly to benefit the social and economic development of local population. A geopark project in the area would be an incentive to that development and a way to educate the population about geodiversity, geoheritage and volcanic hazards topics. This type of strategy would have to include local institutions in its management, such as local government bodies, universities and research units, nature conservation staff and local associations to be a nationally and internationally recognized project.

 

Key words: Calbuco volcano, Southern Andes, volcanic risk, geoheritage, education.

How to cite: Sanchez, F., Pereira, P., Romero, J., and Schilling, M.: Fostering geoheritage in volcanic risk areas: the case of the Calbuco volcano, Southern Chile., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5806, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5806, 2023.

09:10–09:20
|
EGU23-3568
|
GM11.1
|
Virtual presentation
Anastasiei Ana Maria and Niacșu Lilian

Geotourism has been attracting more and more interest of the scientific community and the authorities in charge of tourism management and marketing. In Romania, such interest has just started to build, most of geotourism-relate research focusing on montaineous areas and not having an unitary approach. One of the least explored regions in terms of geotourism valorisation is the Moldavian Plateau, which is representative for the hilly lands of Romania. The plateau covers the entire North-East area of the country (27,158 km2) and is heavily affected by both by surface denudation and gully erosion.

The aim of the current study is to build an inventory of geomorphosites and geosites, that may help setting up the profile of the plateau. The transformations suffered by this landform unit over time motivate the need for an updated profile, which can be further integrated in future research works concerning the  creation of a gully-based geopark.

The first step was to corroborate the already existing data on the location and size of the gullies. Further on, a list of evaluation criteria was established and applied in the consequent fieldwork stage. The geomorphosites and geosites were identified and located using qualitative a evaluation process aiming to determine the geomorphological intrinsic value, potential use, and required protection. In addition, a GIS-based methodology was implemented in order to build the profile of the Moldavian Plateau. Finally, the identification of the geomorphosites and geosites served to the proposal of  geotrails; which represent the basis for geotourism in the study area, as an alternative for local economic development. Geoparks have proven to be excellent tools for educating the public about Earth Sciences; and are also important recreational areas and favour significant sustainable economic development.

Keywords: Geoheritage, Geoscience education, Gullies potential, Geosites, Geomorphosites.

How to cite: Ana Maria, A. and Lilian, N.: The valorisation of the (Geo)heritage between the Siret and Prut Rivers of the Moldavian Plateau (Romania), EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3568, 2023.

09:20–09:25
09:25–09:35
|
EGU23-10721
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Silas Samuel dos Santos Costa

The UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGG) as program was based in the natural heritage conservation philosophy to promote sustainability. The idea allowed the creation and consolidation of national, continental and global networks of geoparks. The paleontological heritage developed an important task in the UGG progress and succession. Here, the analysis of the public material exposed in the geoparks’ and UNESCO’s websites can collaborate for the geoheritage valorization understanding. The data was collected take in account the geoparks descriptions of their geography, geoheritage and designation year. Was detailed by statistics, geoparks with paleontological heritage as main highlight. 57 UGGps have their own geological heritage as primary or secondary interest connected to paleontology. 13% of all geoparks were identified as a paleontological in their main geoheritage interest, and 11% as secondary interest associated to fossils. During the stage of Global Geopark Network (GGN) was noted a period with more designations of paleontological heritage geoparks. After, through the 2018-2020 interval in the UGG, it is observed another growth also. More than half of these “paleogeoparks” are part of the European continent. It is observable a strong relationship between territorial identity and paleontological heritage expressed by marketing strategy, when is possible found ammonites, trilobites, dinosaurs, tetrapod, petrified wood and other local fossils linked to the geopark image and divulgation, remarked in logotypes for example. Was possible recognize that some geological time or typologies of fossils are more common in the geoparks’ paleontological heritage, such as cretaceous, quaternary and vertebrate patrimonial records. In this direction was possible to consider pioneers UGGps to paleontological heritage, thus European and Asiatic continents with major quantity of “paleogeoparks”, as China, Germany, Spain, Canada, France and Greece – at least with five “paleogeoparks” per country. It is possible reconstruct the Earth’s history of life through the UGGps. Furthermore, other continents have potential to explore more the paleontological heritage to promote sustainable development.

How to cite: dos Santos Costa, S. S.: The role of Paleontological Heritage in UNESCO Global Geoparks, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10721, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10721, 2023.

09:35–09:45
|
EGU23-5264
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Jonathan Bussard

In geoparks, the presence of “sites and landscapes of international geological significance” (UNESCO definition) is a very favourable condition for the development of geotourism, but the existence of these sites alone does not guarantee that people will visit them and discover their geological or geomorphological qualities. To convey an understandable and coherent message to the audience, interpretation is essential. The geoscientific interest of the geosites, generally recognised by the scientific community, indeed must be shown and explained to the visitors. But explaining geology or geomorphology to a lay public is not always easy, the manner of interpreting depends on the target audience and the messages the interpreter wishes to convey should be related to a selection of specific sites or themes.

Based on examples from the M’Goun Global Geopark located in the central High Atlas (Morocco), we propose a discussion on the geotourism potential of geomorphological landscapes with two specific questions:

(1) how to select sites according to their didactic potential?

(2) what is the point of view of the local guides regarding the interest of the sites and interpretation?

Geomorphological landscapes – defined as landscapes whose geomorphological component is of heritage interest (Bussard & Reynard, 2022) – are interesting supports for the dissemination of scientific knowledge in geomorphology. Their didactic potential indicates the degree of relevance or ease with which the site can be integrated into an interpretation process relating to one or more defined themes (Bussard et al., 2022). We describe the didactic potential of 8 geomorphological landscapes of the M’Goun Global Geopark (Bussard, 2022) and a selection of specific themes according to two criteria: visibility (clear view of the object) and level of complexity (number of objects, complexity of processes). The description of these criteria allows the managers of the sites to build an interpretation plan based on a coherent selection of sites and themes adapted to the target audience.

After this analysis through the lens of geomorphology, we conducted a series of interviews with professional guides working in the area to better understand their views on the interpretation of geomorphological sites. As they have a privileged contact with many visitors, guides play a key role in the transmission of knowledge on local and regional geomorphology. The interviews show that the concepts specific to geomorphology and geology are often unfamiliar to the guides, but that there is a genuine interest on their part in these subjects, particularly in palaeontology (the geopark contains numerous traces and bones of dinosaurs) and geomorphology, through the reading of the landscapes and their morphogenesis.

 

References

Bussard, J. (2022). Paysages géomorphologiques du Géoparc du M’Goun (Maroc) : Fiches descriptives. Institut de géographie et durabilité, Université de Lausanne. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7181982

Bussard J., Reynard E. (2022). Heritage value and stakeholders’ perception of four geomorphological landscapes in Southern Iceland. Geoheritage, 14, article 89. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-022-00722-8

Bussard J., Martin S., Monbaron M., Reynard E., & El Khalki Y. (2022). Les paysages géomorphologiques du Haut Atlas central (Maroc) : Potentiel éducatif et éléments pour la médiation scientifique. Géomorphologie : Relief, processus, environnement. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/geomorphologie/17103

How to cite: Bussard, J.: Geomorphological landscapes of the M’Goun Geopark (Morocco): potential for geotourism and local guides’ perspective, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5264, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5264, 2023.

09:45–09:55
|
EGU23-7925
|
GM11.1
|
Virtual presentation
Rubén García-Hernández, Javier Dóniz-Páez, Esther Beltrán-Yanes, Nemesio M. Pérez, and Pedro A. Hernández

Tenerife is the largest (2034 km2), and the highest (3718 m a.s.l.) island of the Canary. It has been built up as a result of the accumulation of different volcanic materials during the last 12 million years. In Tenerife it can be recognized different morphostructures: three shield volcanoes (Anaga, Teno and Adeje), two volcanic ridges (Pedro Gil and Abeque), a important volcanic field in the south of the island, a central caldera (Las Cañadas), a complex stratovolcano (Teide-Pico Viejo) and hundreds of cinder or scoria monogentic cones scattered throughout the island's geography. Despite this geological and volcanic richness, geological heritage is currently given less importance than biogegraphical heritage when identifying, defining and catalogue natural areas to protect (NPA). The objective of this work is to obtain the classification of geomorphological heritage of the total NPAs of the island and show the importance that these volcanic forms and their processes have in the natural landscapes of Tenerife. In this work we utilized the methodology elaborated by Serrano and González (2014) and involves a three-way comparison of the different values of the geomorphosites: scientific, cultural and use and management values. The values of geomorphological heritage are expressed from 1 to 5. Tenerife has forty-three NPAs with a total of more than 110,098 hectares, which represents more than 49% of its surface. The variety of NPAs are: one National Park, ten Natural Reserves, one Natural Park, two Rural Park, fourteen Natural Monuments, nine Protected Landscapes and six Sites of scientific interest. In general, the NPAs shows the geodiversity of Tenerife´s volcanism with average scientific (1.5), cultural (1.8) and use (2.6) values. These data show the importance of geoheritage in the NPAs of Tenerife (shield volcanoes, stratovolcanoes, volcanic ridges, scoria cones, lava fields, hornitos, lava tubes, lava deltas, calderas, ravines, cliffs, beaches, dunes, etc.), but we can´t avoid the human intervention on several characteristics at these areas with cultural values over than scientific (mythos, legends, archaeological sites, traditional construction, crops, livestock, etc.). The geomorphological heritage analysis expressed the relationship between of the volcanic natural heritage and the humans. (Volturmac-MAC2/4.6c/298).

How to cite: García-Hernández, R., Dóniz-Páez, J., Beltrán-Yanes, E., Pérez, N. M., and Hernández, P. A.: Geographical heritage in natural protected areas of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) , EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-7925, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7925, 2023.

09:55–10:05
|
EGU23-8990
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Petra Schneider, Zorica Petrinec, Goran Radonić, Goran Pavić, and Dražen Balen

The area of the Mt. Papuk (eastern Croatia) is characterised by rich biodiversity and historical heritage, but also by an exceptional geodiversity, providing the ground for declaration of Nature Park (NP) Papuk in 1999. However, the uniqueness of certain features has been recognized even earlier as in the case of the Rupnica geosite, which has been declared the “First Croatian Geological Monument of Nature” as early as 1948. In 2007 the geodiversity and geoheritage of Mt. Papuk were internationally recognised which therefore became the first protected area in Croatia to receive the status of a geopark and became a member of both the European and World Geopark Network under the protection of UNESCO.  

Rupnica geosite (NW part of Papuk Geopark, near the town of Voćin) is famous for the well-exposed occurrence of columnar jointing. Although the exposed outcrop is not as impressive in size as some other world-known sites with the same feature, Rupnica is a scientifically valuable geosite as columnar jointing is more commonly developed in basaltic rocks, while the rocks exposed at Rupnica are acidic. The rocks of Rupnica are albite and aegirine-albite rhyolites with porphyritic texture dominated by albite phenocrysts hosted in matrix of albite microliths, quartz and devitrified volcanic glass with accessory minerals (magnetite, apatite, zircon and occasionally alkali clinopyroxene (aegirine-augite)). Volcanic rocks of Rupnica formed by cooling and (near-)surface crystallisation of acidic magma during the Late Cretaceous (~81 Ma) and are related to regional geological events associated with closure of the Neotethys Ocean. Geochemistry points to a parental A-type magma formed in an anorogenic tectonic setting from a lower crustal source with peraluminous, alkali-calcic to alkalic, ferroan and high-temperature (780–900 °C) character. Recent studies of inclusions captured in accessory zircon (i.e. anatase, fluorapatite and hematite) indicates possible mantle source contribution, rapid uplift and cooling of an oxidised magma.

Despite its scientific value, it is mainly the striking surface appearance that makes the Rupnica geosite a trademark of the Papuk Geopark. Nevertheless, both recent and past volcanic activity and associated rocks are usually the main geotouristic attraction and a significant geoheritage. Additional infrastructure and educational facilities recently developed in the Papuk Geopark area, such as the Geo-info centre Voćin (opened in early 2022, only 1 km from Rupnica geosite), enhance geotouristic experience and control visitor access. The now increased number of visitors (~19,000 visitors in 2022, compared to the not precisely known but relatively low number of previous visitors to Rupnica) provides additional opportunities for expansion of local accommodation capacities and touristic offer, contributing to regional economic development. Furthermore, Rupnica geosite is used as an educational polygon for geology students, in primary and secondary science education, but also for the youngest with “Rupko’s School of Geology”, in which the development of columnar jointing is explained in a popular way. The promotional and educational activities of the Papuk Geopark, one of the main tasks of the UNESCO Global Geopark Network, constantly enhance public perception of geodiversity and exceptional geoheritage of the Mt. Papuk area.

How to cite: Schneider, P., Petrinec, Z., Radonić, G., Pavić, G., and Balen, D.: Geoheritage and geotourism in the Papuk UNESCO Geopark (Croatia) at its key locality Rupnica - the “First Croatian Geological Monument of Nature”, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-8990, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8990, 2023.

10:05–10:15
|
EGU23-14902
|
GM11.1
|
Virtual presentation
Tolgonai Bozzhigit kyzy, Andrzej Kostrzewski, and Mikołaj Majewski

In recent decades, the tourism industry has become one of the key sectors in the global economy, which is related not only to the number of people employed in tourism services but also to significant revenues from tourism to state budgets. Along with the development of tourism and the increase in the number of tourists, the new so-called phenomenon of "overtourism" has appeared. It causes various negative effects on nature as well as on society. Therefore, in recent years sustainable development of regions in all areas of the economy has been emphasized, especially in the tourism industry. This process is mainly implemented in highly developed countries; however, the problem is likewise significant in developing countries, including Central Asia. Geotourism fits perfectly into this trend, as residents and tourists benefit from it, and public awareness of the environment is a positive side effect. In addition, geotourism can serve as a powerful tool in educating society about the protection of abiotic and biotic elements of the natural environment.

The main aim of the study is to analyze the current state and prospects for the development of geotourism in the Jeti-Oguz Valley in the southern part of the Issyk-Kul Region, Kyrgyzstan. This region is one of the most attractive destinations for tourists throughout Central Asia. The Jeti-Oguz Valley was selected as an area for detailed research based on geoinformation analysis of individual elements of the natural environment.

The analysis of the current state and prospects for the development of geotourism is primarily based on a detailed inventory of georesources and tourist infrastructure of the Jeti-Oguz Valley. The inventory was supplemented by surveys among the local community. Based on the collected research material, a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis was carried out regarding the further development of geotourism in the Issyk-Kul Region.

How to cite: Bozzhigit kyzy, T., Kostrzewski, A., and Majewski, M.: The current state and prospects for the development of geotourism in the Jeti-Oguz Valley in the Issyk-Kul Region, Kyrgyzstan, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-14902, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-14902, 2023.

Posters on site: Mon, 24 Apr, 10:45–12:30 | Hall X3

Chairpersons: Vittoria Vandelli, Márton Pál, Paola Coratza
X3.49
|
EGU23-418
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
Highlight
Edina Hajdú and Márton Pál

Nowadays, geotourism is a more and more widely known branch of tourism. Owing to this, it is organically connected to modern science communication solutions, since one of its main goals is to protect geoscience values ​​and present them sustainably to the general public. In recent years, in the scientific community, we have been able to come across easy-to-interpret geocommunication applications, mainly at various conferences. Through these events and methods, a larger group of researchers can get in touch with geoheritage scientific results that apply the possibilities of new IT developments, field data collection, and GIS.

However, the most important is the opening effect of the various virtual opportunities that make field-based scientific visual content available to a larger audience using the Internet: spectacular and important geosites sometimes cannot be enjoyed by everyone due to various restrictions, limitations, or even distance. The 3D visualisation method in the case of geoheritage has not been used widely in Hungary yet, but some applications are available in other countries: e.g. in some Spanish (Martínez-Graña et al., 2019) and Greek (Papadopoulou et al., 2022) areas and geoparks, there are already communication and educational platforms working on this basis.

To introduce this practice in Hungary, a 3D-based, freely available web platform was created using an open-source mapping software about the most important geosites of the Balaton Uplands (which have already been selected based on a geosite evaluation - Pál & Albert, 2021). The basis of the models is the toolbox of UAV photogrammetry, which I used during my work to generate the data. The drone survey of the 6 designated geosites took place over several field days. The compiled models – based on the photos taken in the field – were then uploaded to a web environment. Visitors can access the web interface from anywhere without any temporal and physical restrictions. With the help of additional interactive scientific descriptive materials, we can more easily communicate the scientific information that can be connected to the presented geosite. Planning future tourism activities, looking through the geoscientific wonders of the Balaton Uplands and effective science interpretation are the most important designated aims. This way, this digital form of communication can become more widely known in Hungary as well, and the concept of protecting geoheritage could reach the general public. Hopefully, this application may generate more visitor numbers for the presented geosites too.

Martínez-Graña, A., Goy, J., González-Delgado, J., Cruz, R., Sanz, J., Cimarra, C., & de Bustamante, I. (2018). 3D Virtual Itinerary in the Geological Heritage from Natural Areas in Salamanca-Ávila-Cáceres, Spain. Sustainability, 11(1), 144. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su11010144.

Pál, M. & Albert, G. (2021). Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management. Geoheritage 13(8). DOI: 10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6.

Papadopoulou, E. E., Papakonstantinou, A., Vasilakos, C., Zouros, N., Tataris, G., Proestakis, S. & Soulakellis, N. (2022). Scale issues for geoheritage 3D mapping: The case of Lesvos Geopark, Greece. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.08.006.

How to cite: Hajdú, E. and Pál, M.: Creating a web-based 3D virtual field trip geotourism platform, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-418, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-418, 2023.

X3.50
|
EGU23-540
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
Lidia Selmi, Vittoria Vandelli, and Paola Coratza

The susceptibility to deterioration of a geosite is known as degradation risk. Its assessment is fundamental to have an overview of the condition of a geosite and to schedule a correct monitoring plan in order to conserve the geoheritage relevance and re-establish stable conditions that were lost. The degradation risk assessment provides precious information for a correct protection of the geological heritage and its management, with attention to the effects of climate change. A periodic assessment of the degradation risk helps the researchers to understand the environmental and anthropogenic processes that act on a geosite and to monitor its possible changes across time.

Due to the increase in geoconservation studies, several methods of assessment of geosites have been published since the 1990s. However, there is little literature about degradation risk in connection with geoheritage. Geoheritage degradation risk should be assessed in the first stages of any geoconservation strategy, even more when the aim is to tackle the effects of climate change already in action. Four main criteria to assess the degradation risk are usually considered: fragility, natural vulnerability, anthropic vulnerability and public use. However, the terminology is not univocal and same terms are used by the authors differently. Hence, a standard methodology that supports the recognition and prevention of threats affecting geosites is missing.

In this work are summarised and analysed the papers published until now on degradation risk assessment and  are classified in different typologies. The aims of this study is to analyse how methods of degradation risk of geoheritage developed and to compare them, to shed light on terms and methods and helps future research consider using the best methodology to evaluate how their own work.

How to cite: Selmi, L., Vandelli, V., and Coratza, P.: Degradation Risk Assessment methods: comparative analysis and typology, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-540, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-540, 2023.

X3.51
|
EGU23-4420
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
William Hernández, Javier Dóniz-Páez, Esther Beltrán-Yanes, Rafael Becerra-Ramírez, Pedro A. Hernández, and Nemesio M. Pérez

El Hierro Island is the westernmost and the smallest of the Canary Islands. It is the youngest volcanic island in the archipelago and has a rich and diverse heritage related to volcanic forms and processes, in which geomorphology is the main value, receiving in 2014 the designation of Global Geopark by UNESCO. El Hierro receives every year thousands of tourists mainly motivated by diving and trekking. For this reason, the aim of this work is the inventory, selection and quantitative evaluation of well preserved and accessible volcanic geomorphosites with a geoturistic interest, in order to promote the geotourism and to diversify the leisure offer on the island. In this work we applied the geomorphosites assessment methodology elaborated by Serrano and González (2014). This methodology involves a three-way comparison of the different values of the geomorphosites: the scientific or intrinsic values, cultural values and use and management values. The values of geomorphological heritage are expressed from 1 to 5. The results reveal the existence of twenty geomorphosites with potential use for geoturism. These sites include cinder cones, lava fields, lava deltas, faults, giant landslides, valleys, cliffs and beaches. The geomorphosites with highest geomorphological heritage are El Golfo and El Julan giant landslides and those with the lowest are Hoya Fileba and Tanganasoga volcanoes. In general, the twenty selected sites show average values between 1.6 to 2.0. Valuable information provided by this study and knowledge of these twenty geomorphosites are important for promotion of tourism activities in the Geopark. The selection of these geomorphosites can contribute geotourism as an important leisure activity in the island and can assist planners and authorities to formulate suitable plans for sustained development of the El Hierro UNESCO Global Geopark by the creation of geo-routes. (Volturmac-MAC2/4.6c/298).

How to cite: Hernández, W., Dóniz-Páez, J., Beltrán-Yanes, E., Becerra-Ramírez, R., Hernández, P. A., and Pérez, N. M.: Geoturism in a volcanic sites: El Hierro UNESCO Global geopark (Canary Islands, Spain)  , EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4420, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4420, 2023.

X3.52
|
EGU23-4441
|
GM11.1
Victoria Josefina Leal Moreno, Javier Dóniz-Páez, Daniel Di Nardo, Violeta Tai Albertos, Nemesio M. Pérez, Pedro A. Hernández, Leví García-Romero, and Néstor Marrero-Rodríguez

Urban geoturism is a relatively recent type of tourism that has increased a lot in recent years. The elaboration of geotouristic trails is the main way to develop this type of tourism in cities. Urban geotourism aims at exploiting the cultural heritage (churches, hermitages, cemeteries, houses, squares, streets, etc.) and the urban layout itself. But too the geographical and natural elements (volcanoes, ravines, cliffs, beaches, dunes, etc.) that have not been wiped out by the urban growth and transformation processes. In this study we have chosen the old centre of las Palmas de Gran Canaria (LPGC) in Gran Canaria. The Canary Islands are an active volcanic region located in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean, about 100 km off the west coast of Africa and at a subtropical latitude. The choice of the city of LPGC is due to the fact that it is the main city of the Canary Islands (378.675 inhabitants) and has one of the oldest, largest and best preserved centers in the Canary Island. The aim of this work is to propose an urban geotourism itinerary through the historical centre of Vegueta and Triana neighbourhoods in LPGC city (Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain). The methodology will consist of identifying, selecting and characterizing different geomorphosites in the city (cliffs, beaches, fossil dunes) and describing the main types of stone used for the construction and ornamentation of buildings from the foundation of the city in the 15th century to the present day. Based on the variety of resources identified and inventoried, we have proposed a geographical urban geotourism itinerary to satisfy and diversify the tourist offer of the city, which consists of 24 points distributed between the historic neighborhoods of Triana and Vegueta, in which elements of the volcanic heritage of the island and/or that present important natural and cultural value linked mainly to religious (10) and civil (15) heritage. This proposed route is of low difficulty and can be done in two hours. The material identified mainly in elements of the facades of the buildings is gray, white, and green ignimbrite and scoria volcanic rocks. Part of this material comes from the Tirma, Teror and Galdar quarries. Elements of sandstone, limestone, pumice, organogenic sand, boulders, red scoria were also identified, as well as structures with the presence of sandstone as cement. (Volturmac-MAC2/4.6c/298).

How to cite: Leal Moreno, V. J., Dóniz-Páez, J., Di Nardo, D., Albertos, V. T., Pérez, N. M., Hernández, P. A., García-Romero, L., and Marrero-Rodríguez, N.: Urban geotourism in the historic center of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain), EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-4441, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4441, 2023.

X3.53
|
EGU23-6174
|
GM11.1
Raquel Maria Jurado Merchan, Pablo Higueras, and Jose Tejero

The Almadén mercury mine, located in Ciudad Real province, South-Central Spain, has been the World’s largest producer of this element worldwide. During its continuous activity of 2000 years, it has provided some one third of the total human production of this element. Many different technologies have been used to perform the mining exploitation of this singular mine, of underground typology, and centred in a complex cinnabar (HgS) orebody, with some 650 m. depth and some 500 m. length.

Mercury is an element which importance for mankind has been diverse in different moments of history: Romans considered its ore, cinnabar, a critical resource, producing the important red stain; Arabs were highly interested on the alchemy concerns affecting this unique liquid metal; during the conquest of America, the discovery of the possibilities of amalgamation in silver recovery produced an intense traffic of this element from Europe to the new discovered continent; during the early 20th century, the use of Hg fulminate in ammunition also made of this element an important war resource. However, the catastrophic Hg-related poisoning in Minamata (Japan) and Iraq caused the acute decline of the importance of this element, due to the high toxicity of most of its compounds.

In this work we present the results of a heritage-based research of a critical historic moment of the mine exploitation, concerning the transformation of a technically obsolete mining facility in a mine equipped with the latest advances that the use of electrical energy allowed. Besides, this research has allowed to cover an important documentary gap, concerning a period of time that had not been addressed in any previous research work.

How to cite: Jurado Merchan, R. M., Higueras, P., and Tejero, J.: The electrification of the Almadén mercury mine: causes and consequences., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6174, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6174, 2023.

X3.54
|
EGU23-10380
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
Andréa Maciel Lima, Cláudia Valéria de Lima, and Paulo Pereira

Geoheritage is the part of geodiversity constituted by the natural abiotic elements that must be conserved due to its heritage value. In this work, the first results on the study of the geodiversity and the geoheritage of the southwest Goiás micro-region, in Brazil, are presented. This region is composed by 18 municipalities characterized by the agricultural and cattle-raising activities that stand out in the Brazilian Centre-West. Plateaus dominate the landscape, corresponding to the northern limits of the Paraná Sedimentary Basin in the state of Goiás, covering one of the marginal sections of this Palaeozoic and Mesozoic age basin. Two geomorphological sub-units are differentiated by altimetric unevenness and erosive processes that originated different types of dissection: Rio Verde Plateau and Caiapônia Plateau, separated by an alignment of ridges, called Serra do Caiapó. Public incentives and investments and the low price of land caused a wave of migration of rural landowners and producers from the South and Southeast regions to the Southwest of Goiás. The plateaus with low slope and soil corrections contributed to the mechanization of the field which were crucial to its agricultural occupation. The scenario of high productivity remains until today, indicating the great intensity of the dynamics of land use and occupation. In order to disseminate geodiversity and geoheritage concepts and to promote initial stages of a geoconservation and geotourism strategy, an inventory was carried out. Through documental research and field work, an assessment was made, comprising the identification of different sites typologies, use values, degradation risk and relevance of potential geosites. 42 potential geosites classified by their geomorphological (16), hydrogeological (15), paleontological (3), lithological (2), pedological (2), paleoenvironmental (2), mining (1) and tectonic-structural (1) interest have been inventoried. The area includes a portion of the Araguainha Astroblema, a geosite of international relevance and the Emas National Park, since 2001 a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Archaeological sites identified in the municipalities of Caiapônia and Serranópolis were also considered, due to the strong association of cultural value with local geodiversity. The area has great potential for geoheritage dissemination, with different types of interest and use values. Geodiversity supported the development of human activities since thousands of years ago, evidenced in the rocks through paintings and rock carvings or in recent activities such as agriculture. It is intended that these data may serve as a contribution to geoconservation and geotourism strategies based on the geoheritage value and its strong relationship with cultural elements.

How to cite: Maciel Lima, A., de Lima, C. V., and Pereira, P.: Geoheritage inventory in southwest Goiás, Brazil: a first step to disseminate geodiversity and its association with culture, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10380, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10380, 2023.

X3.56
|
EGU23-8970
|
GM11.1
|
Lucie Kubalíková and Paola Coratza

Relationships between geodiversity and culture are very close and frequent and they are reflected in numerous and different areas, situations, or levels. This contribution aims to analyse the links geodiversity – culture within the concept of geosystem services (or abiotic ecosystem services). Based on the definitions of culture and analysis of geosystem services schemes (Gray 2013, Gordon 2018), it was possible to catch some reflections of geodiversity-culture relationships not only within cultural and knowledge services, but also within supporting and provisioning services. Moreover, the geodiversity – culture connections are reflected in every day’s life and language, thus a quick insight into these topics is also presented.

While some aspects of geodiversity – culture relationships have been given more attention and been investigated more thoroughly (e.g. building stone and architecture, or geotourism and geoeducation), other aspects remain unexplored (e.g. geodiversity – culture links in geo-toponyms, heraldry, myths, language, sense of place). Focused attention and further research is also needed in the case of societal development, citizen science projects and participative research (Kubalíková and Coratza 2023). Generally, it can be said that when studying geodiversity – culture links, the multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary approaches are necessary.

Geosystem services approach can represent a step towards integrated management, conservation and promotion which is always more effective than conserving, managing or promoting particular landscape (both natural and cultural) elements in an isolated way. Anchoring the geodiversity – culture relationships within the concept of geosystem services may provide a framework for future studies and may contribute to the better understanding of protection and sustainable use not only of geoheritage, but entire geodiversity and justify conservation measures applied not only on the site level (that means on particular geosites, geomorphosites or geocultural sites), but also on the geodiversity as a whole.

 

Keywords: geosystem services, local identity, building stone, language, heritage, geodiversity, culture

 

References:

Gordon JE (2018) Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences, 8, 136, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136

Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell

Kubalíková L, Coratza P (2023) Reflections of geodiversity – culture relationships within the concept of abiotic ecosystem services. In Kubalíková L et al. eds. Visages of Geodiversity and Geoheritage. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 530, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP530-2022-155

 

How to cite: Kubalíková, L. and Coratza, P.: Geodiversity – culture relationships within the concept of geosystem services, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-8970, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8970, 2023.

X3.57
|
EGU23-528
|
GM11.1
|
ECS
|
Highlight
Vittoria Vandelli, Alessandro Ghinoi, and Paola Coratza

Geotourism, as a form of sustainable tourism, promotes the conservation of geodiversity by spreading knowledge in Earth Science and through appreciation of geological features among the general public. Moreover, geotourism support regional economic development of those communities living and working around sites of geological and geomorphological interest. On the one hand, legal protection of geosites can play a crucial role in geodiversity conservation, on the other, education is fundamental to increase people awareness on the importance of geological and geomorphological heritage. Non-formal learning activities based on geoheritage interpretation can be useful tools to attract interest on the need of geoheritage management and conservation. Starting from these premises, this paper presents the outputs of research carried out in the Municipality of Castellarano (Emilia Apennines, Northern Italy). This area hosts valuable natural features (including geological and geomorphological ones) which are however neglected even by local people. For the valorisation of these areas, territorial plans based on geoheritage management and sustainable exploitation have been implemented in close collaboration with local administrations and stakeholders. Territorial resources and restrictions, geological hazards, as well as inputs from the local communities, have been considered in planning the upgrading of these areas. In particular, a Masterplan aimed at the environmental rehabilitation of dismissed quarries located within the Municipality was designed with specific attention to the recognition and assessment of sites of geological interest located in the surroundings. Multidisciplinary investigations concerning the main geological, vegetational and faunistic aspects were carried out and, considering the results attained, proposals of territorial upgrading have been developed by taking into account also appraisal measures for geotourism and recreational purposes. In the Municipality, another area calling for territorial upgrading interventions was a fluvial stretch of a cycle-pedestrian path characterized by valuable geological and geomorphological features but not well known by the general public. In this area non-formal learning activities based on geoheritage interpretation have been implemented. In particular, three geosites of regional significance located along the cycle-pedestrian path were considered for the creation of EarthCaches, interpretative panels and guided excursions. Different types of target public including general visitors and geotourists were considered. Interpretative contents were designed to be educational, providing accurate but non-technical explanations on the geological and geomorphological features of the sites. Illustrations helping in visualization and conceptualization of the scientific information and schematization of landscape features were included. Cultural and historical aspects were also considered with the purpose of integrating them with geoheritage information. The effectiveness of the territorial upgrading measures has been tested through feedbacks received from local administrations, directly with field surveys, in the frameworks of guided excursions, as well as by considering the EarthCache logs. The results revealed that the implemented measures are effective contributions for raising public awareness on the value of geodiversity and interest in the valuable geological and geomorphological features of the area.

How to cite: Vandelli, V., Ghinoi, A., and Coratza, P.: Territorial upgrading through geoheritage management and enhancement in the Emilia Apennines (Italy), EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-528, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-528, 2023.